scholarly journals Mothers' perceptions of children's food behaviors: use of focus group interview study

2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Mee Lee ◽  
Jung-Hyun Kim ◽  
Yu-Jin Oh ◽  
Min-June Lee
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Interview ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Group Interview ◽  
Food Behaviors

scholarly journals How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e008681 ◽  
Author(s):  
J K Tijdink ◽  
K Schipper ◽  
L M Bouter ◽  
P Maclaine Pont ◽  
J de Jonge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Interview ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Group Interview

scholarly journals The postoperative handover: a focus group interview study with nurse anaesthetists, anaesthesiologists and PACU nurses

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e015038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Randmaa ◽  
Maria Engström ◽  
Christine Leo Swenne ◽  
Gunilla Mårtensson
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Interview ◽  
Qualitative Content Analysis ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Group Interview ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Written Information ◽  
Healthcare Interventions ◽  
Postanaesthesia Care Unit

ObjectivesTo investigate different professionals’ (nurse anaesthetists’, anaesthesiologists’, and postanaesthesia care unit nurses’) descriptions of and reflections on the postoperative handover.DesignA focus group interview study with a descriptive design using qualitative content analysis of transcripts.SettingOne anaesthetic clinic at two hospitals in Sweden.ParticipantsSix focus groups with 23 healthcare professionals involved in postoperative handovers. Each group was homogeneous regarding participant profession, resulting in two groups per profession: nurse anaesthetists (n=8), anaesthesiologists (n=7) and postanaesthesia care unit nurses (n=8).ResultsPatterns and five categories emerged: (1) having different temporal foci during handover, (2) insecurity when information is transferred from one team to another, (3) striving to ensure quality of the handover, (4) weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the bedside handover and (5) having different perspectives on the transfer of responsibility. The professionals’ perceptions of the postoperative handover differed with regard to temporal foci and transfer of responsibility. All professional groups were insecure about having all information needed to ensure the quality of care. They strived to ensure quality of the handover by: focusing on matters that deviated from the normal course of events, aiding memory through structure and written information and cooperating within and between teams. They reported that the bedside handover enhances their control of the patient but also that it could threaten the patient's privacy and that frequent interruptions could be disturbing.ConclusionsThe present findings revealed variations in different professionals’ views on the postoperative handover. Healthcare interventions are needed to minimise the gap between professionals’ perceptions and practices and to achieve a shared understanding of postoperative handover. Furthermore, to ensure high-quality and safe care, stakeholders/decision makers need to pay attention to the environment and infrastructure in postanaesthesia care.

scholarly journals Narratives of Patients with Osteoarthritis from Yucatan: A Focus Group Interview Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lizzette Gómez-de-Regil ◽  
Damaris Estrella-Castillo ◽  
Héctor Rubio-Zapata ◽  
José Álvarez-Nemegyei
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Focus Group Interview ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Group Interview
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document