Clinical Experience of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients with Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema Treated in a Community Hospital in Japan

2014 ◽  
Vol 04 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yano M Sugiyama S
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Oedema ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema

scholarly journals Non-Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema Following the Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Medium: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-185
Author(s):  
Chilan Nguyen ◽  
Tho Pham
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Oedema ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema ◽  
Contrast Administration ◽  
Prompt Treatment ◽  
Appropriate Treatment ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Life Threatening Complication

AbstractNon-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema can be life threatening and requires prompt treatment. While gadolinium-based contrast is generally considered safe with a low risk of severe side effects, non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema has become increasingly recognised as a rare, but possibly life-threatening complication. We present a case of a usually well, young 23-year-old female who developed non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema with a moderate oxygenation impairment and no mucosal or cutaneous features of anaphylaxis following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast. She did not respond to treatment of anaphylaxis but made a rapid recovery following the commencement of positive pressure ventilation. Our case highlights the importance of recognising the rare complication of non-cardiogenic pulmonary oedema following gadolinium-based contrast administration in order to promptly implement the appropriate treatment.

Effect of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) on mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a meta-analysis

The Lancet ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 367 (9517) ◽  
pp. 1155-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Victor Peter ◽  
John L Moran ◽  
Jennie Phillips-Hughes ◽  
Petra Graham ◽  
Andrew D Bersten
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Oedema ◽  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in patients with hypoxemia and various APACHE II scores after extubation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 175346662110042
Author(s):  
Xiaoke Shang ◽  
Yanggan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation ◽  
Abdominal Distension ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Apache Ii Score ◽  
Subgroup Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Aims: The study aimed to compare and analyze the outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) who had extubation after weaning from mechanical ventilation. Methods: A total 120 patients with AHRF were enrolled into this study. These patients underwent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. They were organized into two groups according to the score of Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II); group A: APACHE II score <12; group B: 12⩽ APACHE II score <24. Group A had 72 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (36 patients in each subgroup). Group B had 48 patients and patients given HFNC were randomly assigned to subgroup I while patients given NPPV were assigned to subgroup II (24 patients in each subgroup). General information, respiratory parameters, endpoint event, and comorbidities of adverse effect were compared and analyzed between the two subgroups. Results: The incidence of abdominal distension was significantly higher in patients treated with NPPV than in those treated with HFNC in group A (19.44% versus 0, p = 0.005) and group B (25% versus 0, p = 0.009). There was no significant difference between the HFNC- and NPPV-treated patients in blood pH, oxygenation index, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, respiratory rate, and blood lactic acid concentration in either group ( p > 0.05). Occurrence rate of re-intubation within 72 h of extubation was slightly, but not significantly, higher in NPPV-treated patients ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between HFNC and NPPV in preventing respiratory failure in patients with AHRF with an APACHE II score <24 after extubation. However, HFNC was superior to NPPV with less incidence of abdominal distension. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document