Skin Testing for IgE Mediated Disease can be Done Safely in The Family Practice Office

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry M Garner
2018 ◽  
pp. 110-119

Primary Objectives: By extending the scope of knowledge of the primary care optometrist, the brain injury population will have expanded access to entry level neurooptometric care by optometric providers who have a basic understanding of their neurovisual problems, be able to provide some treatment and know when to refer to their colleagues who have advanced training in neuro-optometric rehabilitation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S90-S90
Author(s):  
Kendall J Tucker ◽  
YoungYoon Ham ◽  
Haley K Holmer ◽  
Caitlin M McCracken ◽  
Ellie Sukerman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are first-line agents for most patients receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Despite evidence showing low cross-reactivity between classes of BLs, patients with allergies commonly receive vancomycin as an alternative to avoid allergic reaction. The objective of this study was to identify potentially inappropriate use of vancomycin surgical prophylaxis among patients with reported BL allergies. Methods Adult patients (≥18 years) receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis with a reported penicillin and/or cephalosporin allergy at our institution between August 2017 to July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for potential eligibility for penicillin allergy testing and/or receipt of standard prophylaxis. Surgery type and allergy history were extracted from the electronic medical record. Per our institution’s penicillin-testing protocol, patients with IgE-mediated reactions < 10 years ago were eligible for penicillin skin testing (PST), mild reactions or IgE-mediated reaction > 10 years ago were eligible for direct oral amoxicillin challenge, and severe non-IgE mediated allergies were ineligible for penicillin allergy evaluation or BL prophylaxis. Results Among 830 patients who received vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, 196 reported BL allergy and were included in the analysis (155 with penicillin allergy alone; 21 with cephalosporin allergy; 20 with both cephalosporin and penicillin allergy). Approximately 40% of surgeries were orthopedic. Six patients were ineligible for BL prophylaxis. Per institutional protocol, 73 of 155 patients (48%) may have qualified for PST; 81 of 155 (52%) patients may have received a direct oral amoxicillin challenge. Only 3 of 22 patients with history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus appropriately received additional prophylaxis with vancomycin and a BL. Conclusion Patients with BL allergies often qualify for receipt of a first-line BL antibiotic. An opportunity exists for improved BL allergy assessment as an antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Future studies should evaluate outcomes associated with BL allergy evaluation and delabeling in patients receiving surgical prophylaxis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakan Yaman ◽  
Erdinç Yavuz ◽  
Adem Er ◽  
Ramazan Vural ◽  
Yalçin Albayrak ◽  
...  

1978 ◽  
pp. 58-72
Author(s):  
Gerald R. Gehringer
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Ronald H. Goldschmidt ◽  
Mary Anne G. Johnson ◽  
Betty J. Dong

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
Fatma Yeşim Karakoç ◽  
Mestan Emek
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 10-18
Author(s):  
Madelyn H. Fernstrom

1977 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 622-622
Author(s):  
Edwabd A. Hartshorn
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document