Perceptions from food safety to food defense in a developing world

2017 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hami Alpas
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. R823-R834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Manning ◽  
Jan Mei Soon
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.S. Shephard

Aflatoxins are widely recognised as important natural contaminants of a wide range of foods, including maize and peanuts (groundnuts), which form part of the staple diet in many countries of the developing world, especially in Africa. There is a frequent misconception based on solubility considerations and developed market surveys that aflatoxins do not occur in peanut oil. Thus, the use of peanut oil in human food is frequently overlooked as a source of aflatoxin exposure, yet artisanal oil extraction from contaminated peanuts in local facilities in the developing world results in carryover of these mycotoxins into the oil. Consequently, these peanut oils can have high contamination levels. This review highlights food safety concerns and addresses inter alia the analytical adaptations required to determine the polar aflatoxins in peanut oil. The determination of aflatoxins in peanut oil was first achieved by thin-layer chromatography, which was later mostly superseded by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection, or later, by mass spectrometric detection. More recently, a specially modified HPLC method with immunoaffinity column clean-up and fluorescence detection has achieved official method status at AOAC International. In addition, the review deals with toxicology, occurrence and detoxification of contaminated oil. Although various methods have been reported for detoxification of peanut oil, the toxicity of degradation products, the removal of beneficial constituents and the effect on its organoleptic properties need to be considered. This review is intended to draw attention to this often overlooked area of food safety.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald B. Larson

PurposeContaminated food is a major source of illnesses around the world. This research seeks to learn how people assign responsibility for two food contamination risks and how they allocate costs to reduce these risks to four members of the food supply chain. The aims are to identify differences between countries and test options to control for cultural differences.Design/methodology/approachA random sample of online panellists from six countries (N = 6,090) was surveyed on how they assigned responsibility for controlling natural and accidental food contamination (traditional food safety) and for controlling intentional contamination (food defense) to farmers, transporters/distributors, retailer grocery stores/restaurants and consumers. They were also asked how they would allocate food safety and defense costs to the four groups. Differences between countries were tested with dummy variables and cultural measures.FindingsIn nearly every country, respondents assigned the least responsibility and allocated the smallest cost shares to consumers. In multivariate models, responsibility and cost-share results differed, suggesting that preferences varied by country and that respondents did not allocate costs the same way they assessed responsibility. The food safety and defense models also differed, implying that the respondents believed the two sources of contamination represented different risks.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine how adults allocate the responsibility and costs for food safety and defense to farmers, transporters/distributors, retailer grocery stores/restaurants and consumers. Other research did not differentiate between these two food risks. This study also compared Hofstede's cultural measures with the recently developed Minkov's cultural measures.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. e201101724175
Author(s):  
Elaine Leão Inácio de Melo Andrade ◽  
Gilberto Carvalho de Oliveira ◽  
Otniel Freitas Silva

O conceito food defense emergiu nos EUA como resposta aos atentados terroristas do 11 de Setembro, em 2001. A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) e outras agências desenvolveram medidas para proteger a cadeia alimentar do país aos ataques maliciosos. O objetivo consistia em adotar medidas preventivas da contaminação intencional da água e alimentos, onde indivíduos recorrem a agentes (biológicos, químicos ou físicos) com o intuito de causar prejuízos às organizações, governos ou à população. A vulnerabilidade da cadeia alimentar propiciou a difusão deste conceito através de normas certificáveis como: International Featured Standards (IFS), British Retail Consortium (BRC) e Food Safety Systems Certification (FSSC 22000). Este estudo tem como objetivo a emergência do conceito food defense (defesa alimentar), junto aos termos já conhecidos: food quality (qualidade alimentar), food safety (segurança alimentar), food security (acessibilidade alimentar) e food fraud (fraude alimentar), através das regulamentações, leis, metodologias e ferramentas para implementação de food defense nas cadeias de produção e distribuição de alimentos de empresas exportadoras até empresas familiares. Metodologia: análise qualitativa através de pesquisa bibliográfica nas bases Scopus, Web of Science e SciELO. Espera-se que os resultados deste estudo despertem a necessidade de formar profissionais da área de alimentos conhecedores do conceito food defense, e que orientem a adoção de medidas conceituais e práticas que previnam e controlem a contaminação intencional de alimentos, de forma a atender às exigências dos mercados consumidores e às normas e legislações vigentes pertinentes à qualidade e segurança dos alimentos.


Author(s):  
Laurian Unnevehr ◽  
Nancy Hirschhorn

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1272-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Stinson ◽  
Koel Ghosh ◽  
Jean Kinsey ◽  
Dennis Degeneffe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document