scholarly journals Non-local Robustness Analysis via Rewriting Techniques

2012 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Ivan Gazeau ◽  
Dale Miller ◽  
Catuscia Palamidessi
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 2067-2092 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Brock ◽  
Steven N. Durlauf

2012 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 63-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Gazeau ◽  
Dale Miller ◽  
Catuscia Palamidessi

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S176-S190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Pereira ◽  
Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes ◽  
Fernando Paredes

A new robustness analysis framework is proposed where robustness of a solution in a decision aiding process is measured as the distance from that solution to an expected outcome, chosen by the decision-aiding analyst. The framework is explained by the application of the TODIM method of multicriteria decision aiding to the problem of predicting rental ranges for properties in a Chilean city. Therefore, the robustness concern concentrates on changes in criteria weights as well as in trade-off rates, as they are defined in the method. Two main contributions are introduced: a local robustness measure, defined in terms of a distance among rankings; and a global robustness measure, as an adaptation of the minimax-regret rule to select a global robust solution, i.e. a ranking produced by TODIM.


Author(s):  
Zhifeng Shao

Recently, low voltage (≤5kV) scanning electron microscopes have become popular because of their unprecedented advantages, such as minimized charging effects and smaller specimen damage, etc. Perhaps the most important advantage of LVSEM is that they may be able to provide ultrahigh resolution since the interaction volume decreases when electron energy is reduced. It is obvious that no matter how low the operating voltage is, the resolution is always poorer than the probe radius. To achieve 10Å resolution at 5kV (including non-local effects), we would require a probe radius of 5∽6 Å. At low voltages, we can no longer ignore the effects of chromatic aberration because of the increased ratio δV/V. The 3rd order spherical aberration is another major limiting factor. The optimized aperture should be calculated as


Author(s):  
Zhifeng Shao ◽  
A.V. Crewe

For scanning electron microscopes, it is plausible that by lowering the primary electron energy, one can decrease the volume of interaction and improve resolution. As shown by Crewe /1/, at V0 =5kV a 10Å resolution (including non-local effects) is possible. To achieve this, we would need a probe size about 5Å. However, at low voltages, the chromatic aberration becomes the major concern even for field emission sources. In this case, δV/V = 0.1 V/5kV = 2x10-5. As a rough estimate, it has been shown that /2/ the chromatic aberration δC should be less than ⅓ of δ0 the probe size determined by diffraction and spherical aberration in order to neglect its effect. But this did not take into account the distribution of electron energy. We will show that by using a wave optical treatment, the tolerance on the chromatic aberration is much larger than we expected.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document