scholarly journals Projection of Seasonal Streamflow Extremes for UCRB Dataset

Ecosphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e02356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalise G. Blum ◽  
Yoichiro Kanno ◽  
Benjamin H. Letcher

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM KLEIBER ◽  
Álvaro Ossandón ◽  
Balaji Rajagopalan ◽  
Manuela Brunner

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. O. Pierini ◽  
J. C. Restrepo ◽  
J. Aguirre ◽  
A. M. Bustamante ◽  
G. J. Velásquez

2022 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-166
Author(s):  
Álvaro Ossandón ◽  
Manuela I. Brunner ◽  
Balaji Rajagopalan ◽  
William Kleiber

Abstract. Timely projections of seasonal streamflow extremes can be useful for the early implementation of annual flood risk adaptation strategies. However, predicting seasonal extremes is challenging, particularly under nonstationary conditions and if extremes are correlated in space. The goal of this study is to implement a space–time model for the projection of seasonal streamflow extremes that considers the nonstationarity (interannual variability) and spatiotemporal dependence of high flows. We develop a space–time model to project seasonal streamflow extremes for several lead times up to 2 months, using a Bayesian hierarchical modeling (BHM) framework. This model is based on the assumption that streamflow extremes (3 d maxima) at a set of gauge locations are realizations of a Gaussian elliptical copula and generalized extreme value (GEV) margins with nonstationary parameters. These parameters are modeled as a linear function of suitable covariates describing the previous season selected using the deviance information criterion (DIC). Finally, the copula is used to generate streamflow ensembles, which capture spatiotemporal variability and uncertainty. We apply this modeling framework to predict 3 d maximum streamflow in spring (May–June) at seven gauges in the Upper Colorado River basin (UCRB) with 0- to 2-month lead time. In this basin, almost all extremes that cause severe flooding occur in spring as a result of snowmelt and precipitation. Therefore, we use regional mean snow water equivalent and temperature from the preceding winter season as well as indices of large-scale climate teleconnections – El Niño–Southern Oscillation, Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, and Pacific Decadal Oscillation – as potential covariates for 3 d spring maximum streamflow. Our model evaluation, which is based on the comparison of different model versions and the energy skill score, indicates that the model can capture the space–time variability in extreme streamflow well and that model skill increases with decreasing lead time. We also find that the use of climate variables slightly enhances skill relative to using only snow information. Median projections and their uncertainties are consistent with observations, thanks to the representation of spatial dependencies through covariates in the margins and a Gaussian copula. This spatiotemporal modeling framework helps in the planning of seasonal adaptation and preparedness measures as predictions of extreme spring streamflows become available 2 months before actual flood occurrence.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Ossandón ◽  
Manuela I Brunner ◽  
Balaji Rajagopalan ◽  
William Kleiber

Abstract. Timely projections of seasonal streamflow extremes can be useful for the early implementation of annual flood risk adaptation strategies. However, predicting seasonal extremes is challenging particularly under non-stationary conditions and if extremes are connected in space. The goal of this study is to implement a space-time model for projection of seasonal streamflow extremes that considers the nonstationarity and spatio-temporal dependence of high flows. We develop a space-time model to project seasonal streamflow extremes for several lead times up to 2 months using a Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling (BHM) framework. This model is based on the assumption that streamflow extremes (3-day maxima) at a set of gauge locations are realizations of a Gaussian elliptical copula and generalized extreme value (GEV) margins with nonstationary parameters. These parameters are modeled as a linear function of suitable covariates from the previous season selected using the deviance information criterion (DIC). Finally, the copula is used to generate streamflow ensembles, which capture spatio-temporal variability and uncertainty. We apply this modelling framework to predict 3-day maximum flow in spring (May-June) at seven gauges in the Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB) with 0 to 2 months lead time. In this basin, almost all extremes that cause severe flooding occur in spring as a result of snowmelt and precipitation. Therefore, we use regional mean snow water equivalent and temperature from the preceding winter season as well as indices of large-scale climate teleconnections – ENSO, AMO, and PDO – as potential covariates for 3-day maximum flow. Our model evaluation, which is based on the comparison of different model versions and the energy skill score, indicates that the model can capture the space-time variability of extreme flow well and that model skill increases with decreasing lead time. We also find that the use of climate variables slightly enhances skill relative to using only snow information. Median projections and their uncertainties are consistent with observations thanks to the representation of spatial dependencies through covariates in the margins and a Gaussian copula. This spatio-temporal modeling framework helps to plan seasonal adaptation and preparedness measures as predictions of extreme spring flows become available 2 months before actual flood occurrence.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Valadares Siqueira ◽  
Levy Boccato ◽  
Romis Attux ◽  
Christiano Lyra Filho

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1573-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Maria-Helena Ramos ◽  
Florian Pappenberger ◽  
Charles Perrin

Abstract. Many fields, such as drought-risk assessment or reservoir management, can benefit from long-range streamflow forecasts. Climatology has long been used in long-range streamflow forecasting. Conditioning methods have been proposed to select or weight relevant historical time series from climatology. They are often based on general circulation model (GCM) outputs that are specific to the forecast date due to the initialisation of GCMs on current conditions. This study investigates the impact of conditioning methods on the performance of seasonal streamflow forecasts. Four conditioning statistics based on seasonal forecasts of cumulative precipitation and the standardised precipitation index were used to select relevant traces within historical streamflows and precipitation respectively. This resulted in eight conditioned streamflow forecast scenarios. These scenarios were compared to the climatology of historical streamflows, the ensemble streamflow prediction approach and the streamflow forecasts obtained from ECMWF System 4 precipitation forecasts. The impact of conditioning was assessed in terms of forecast sharpness (spread), reliability, overall performance and low-flow event detection. Results showed that conditioning past observations on seasonal precipitation indices generally improves forecast sharpness, but may reduce reliability, with respect to climatology. Conversely, conditioned ensembles were more reliable but less sharp than streamflow forecasts derived from System 4 precipitation. Forecast attributes from conditioned and unconditioned ensembles are illustrated for a case of drought-risk forecasting: the 2003 drought in France. In the case of low-flow forecasting, conditioning results in ensembles that can better assess weekly deficit volumes and durations over a wider range of lead times.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-223
Author(s):  
Alexandre C. Costa ◽  
Alvson B. S. Estacio ◽  
Francisco de A. de Souza Filho ◽  
Iran E. Lima Neto

2021 ◽  
pp. 100346
Author(s):  
Kwok Pan Chun ◽  
Bastien Dieppois ◽  
Qing He ◽  
Moussa Sidibe ◽  
Jonathan Eden ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document