scholarly journals Using Neural Networks to Predict Secondary Structure for Protein Folding

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abdulhafidh Ibrahim ◽  
Ibrahim Sabah Yasseen
2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (40) ◽  
pp. 16622-16627 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Lin ◽  
O. F. Mohammed ◽  
G. S. Jas ◽  
A. H. Zewail

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Smolarczyk ◽  
Katarzyna Stapor ◽  
Irena Roterman-Konieczna

AbstractThree-dimensional protein structure prediction is an important task in science at the intersection of biology, chemistry, and informatics, and it is crucial for determining the protein function. In the two-stage protein folding model, based on an early- and late-stage intermediates, we propose to use state-of-the-art secondary structure prediction servers for backbone dihedral angles prediction and devise an early-stage structure. Early-stage structures are used as a starting point for protein folding simulations, and any errors in this stage affect the final predictions. We have shown that modern secondary structure prediction servers could increase the accuracy of early-stage predictions compared to previously reported models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (20) ◽  
pp. 5021-5026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Xu ◽  
Qinghua Wang ◽  
Jianpeng Ma

Abstract Motivation Predictions of protein backbone torsion angles (ϕ and ψ) and secondary structure from sequence are crucial subproblems in protein structure prediction. With the development of deep learning approaches, their accuracies have been significantly improved. To capture the long-range interactions, most studies integrate bidirectional recurrent neural networks into their models. In this study, we introduce and modify a recently proposed architecture named Transformer to capture the interactions between the two residues theoretically with arbitrary distance. Moreover, we take advantage of multitask learning to improve the generalization of neural network by introducing related tasks into the training process. Similar to many previous studies, OPUS-TASS uses an ensemble of models and achieves better results. Results OPUS-TASS uses the same training and validation sets as SPOT-1D. We compare the performance of OPUS-TASS and SPOT-1D on TEST2016 (1213 proteins) and TEST2018 (250 proteins) proposed in the SPOT-1D paper, CASP12 (55 proteins), CASP13 (32 proteins) and CASP-FM (56 proteins) proposed in the SAINT paper, and a recently released PDB structure collection from CAMEO (93 proteins) named as CAMEO93. On these six test sets, OPUS-TASS achieves consistent improvements in both backbone torsion angles prediction and secondary structure prediction. On CAMEO93, SPOT-1D achieves the mean absolute errors of 16.89 and 23.02 for ϕ and ψ predictions, respectively, and the accuracies for 3- and 8-state secondary structure predictions are 87.72 and 77.15%, respectively. In comparison, OPUS-TASS achieves 16.56 and 22.56 for ϕ and ψ predictions, and 89.06 and 78.87% for 3- and 8-state secondary structure predictions, respectively. In particular, after using our torsion angles refinement method OPUS-Refine as the post-processing procedure for OPUS-TASS, the mean absolute errors for final ϕ and ψ predictions are further decreased to 16.28 and 21.98, respectively. Availability and implementation The training and the inference codes of OPUS-TASS and its data are available at https://github.com/thuxugang/opus_tass. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document