scholarly journals Histopathological Evaluation of LAG-3, TIM-3 AND CD38 Levels in Meningiomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-109
Author(s):  
Uzay Erdoğan ◽  
Ozan Haşimoğlu ◽  
Ceyhan Oflezer ◽  
Osman Tanriverdi ◽  
Canan Tanık ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 304-305
Author(s):  
Emily E. Cole ◽  
Patrick B. Leu ◽  
Alex Gomelsky ◽  
Patricia Revelo ◽  
Heidi Shappell ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 818-823
Author(s):  
Juliana F.V. Braga ◽  
Rodrigo M. Couto ◽  
Marcelo C. Rodrigues ◽  
Roselene Ecco

ABSTRACT: Avipoxvirus is the etiological agent of the avian pox, a well-known disease of captive and wild birds, and it has been associated with tumor-like lesions in some avian species. A white-faced whistling duck (Dendrocygna viduata) raised in captivity was referred to a Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Northeast due to cutaneous nodules present in both wings. A few days after the clinical examination, the animal died naturally. Once submitted to necropsy, histopathological evaluation of the lesions revealed clusters of proliferating epithelial cells expanding toward the dermis. Some of these cells had round, well-defined, intracytoplasmic eosinophilic material suggestive of poxvirus inclusion (Bollinger bodies). PCR performed on the DNA extracted from tissue samples amplified a fragment of the 4b core protein gene (fpv167), which was purified and sequenced. This fragment of Avipoxvirus DNA present in these tumor-like lesions showed high genetic homology (100.0%) with other poxviruses detected in different avian species in several countries, but none of them were related to tumor-like lesions or squamous cell carcinoma. This is the first report of Avipoxvirus detected in tumor-like lesions of a white-faced whistling duck with phylogenetic analysis of the virus.


Burns ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serdar Tort ◽  
Fatmanur Tuğcu Demiröz ◽  
Şule Coşkun Cevher ◽  
Sanem Sarıbaş ◽  
Candan Özoğul ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. e22-e25
Author(s):  
Andrew Alabi ◽  
A D. Arvind ◽  
Nikhil Pawa ◽  
Shakir Karim ◽  
Jason Smith

Abstract Background Incidental gallbladder cancer is relatively rare, with an incidence ranging between 0.19 and 5.5% of all the cholecystectomies for benign disease, and carries a poor prognosis. Currently, in the literature, there appears to be some controversy about whether all gallbladder specimens should be sent for routine histopathology. The aim of this study was to investigate the need for either routine or selective histopathological evaluation of all gallbladder specimens following cholecystectomy in our institution. Methods The records of all patients who underwent a cholecystectomy (laparoscopic and open) for gallstone disease over a 5-year period (between January 2011 and January 2016) were reviewed retrospectively in a single university teaching hospital. Patients with radiological evidence of gallbladder cancer preoperatively were excluded. The notes of patients with incidental gallbladder cancer were reviewed and data were collected for clinical presentation and preoperative investigations including blood tests and radiological imaging. Results A total of 1,473 specimens were sent for histopathological evaluation, with two patients being diagnosed with an incidental gallbladder cancer (papillary adenocarcinoma in situ and moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma [stage IIIa]). The incidence rate was 0.14%. All patients with incidental gallbladder cancer had macroscopically abnormal specimens. Conclusion Both patients in our study who were diagnosed with incidental gallbladder cancer had macroscopic abnormalities. A selective rather than routine approach to histological evaluation of gallbladder specimens especially in those with macroscopic abnormalities should be employed. This will reduce the burden on the pathology department with potential cost savings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document