scholarly journals Mantle cell lymphoma: involvement of nodal and extranodal sites in the head and neck, with multifocal oral lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Marcucci ◽  
Gilberto Marcucci ◽  
Mirna Scalon Cordeiro ◽  
Jorge Esquiche León ◽  
Juliane Piragine Araujo ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110251
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Breen ◽  
Janet Chao ◽  
Saral Mehra ◽  
Nikita Kohli

Objectives: To describe disease characteristics and treatment and to analyze survival and mortality for extranodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) of the head and neck. Methods: Patients with extranodal MCL—excluding primary sites in the salivary glands, eye, and adnexa—were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Registries (2000-2015). Overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of MCL and non-MCL mortality were calculated. Factors associated with MCL and non-MCL mortality were analyzed with cause-specific hazard models. Results: Five hundred nine patients met criteria for descriptive analysis and 294 patients met criteria for survival analysis, with a median follow-up of 58 months. The most common sites for MCL were the oropharynx (66.0%), nasopharynx (19.1%), and oral cavity (8.4%). The most common treatment received was chemotherapy alone (48.9%), followed by chemoradiation therapy (16.9%), and radiation therapy alone (10.4%). The proportion of cases diagnosed as early-stage disease ranged from 31% of sinonasal MCLs to 83% of laryngeal MCLs. At 5 years, OS was 63% (95% CI: 57%-69%). There was no significant difference in OS ( P = .79), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality ( P = .76), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality ( P = .98) by anatomic site. Comparing early-stage to late-stage disease, there was no significant difference in OS ( P = .38), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality ( P = .07), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality ( P = .14). Multivariate analysis showed increased hazard of MCL mortality for patients that were older or that presented with stage III or stage IV disease. Conclusion: The oropharynx is the most common subsite of head and neck MCLs, followed by the nasopharynx. Primary head and neck MCLs appear to present at an earlier stage than MCLs of other regions. In particular, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal MCLs may present as stage I or II disease.


Author(s):  
MIRNA SCALON CORDEIRO ◽  
GILBERTO MARCUCCI ◽  
MARCELO MARCUCCI ◽  
KARINA CECÍLIA PANELLI SANTOS ◽  
LUIZA VERÔNICA WARMLING ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2652-2652
Author(s):  
Raji Shameem ◽  
Muhammad Saad Hamid ◽  
Nasheed Mohammad Hossain ◽  
Jeffrey Mufson ◽  
Patricia L. Kropf

Abstract Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is a rare sub-type of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL). Outcomes of secondary MCL (sMCL) in patients with a prior diagnosis of a solid malignancy as compared to de novo MCL are not well understood. Differences may be attributable to age, gender, race/ethnicity, extra-nodal involvement, and stage at initial diagnosis. We sought to determine differences in outcome by analyzing data from a large nationwide cancer registry. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1973-2012) was used to detect MCL (ICD-O-3 code: 9673/3) adult (>18 years) cases. The variable "First Malignant Primary Indicator" was used to differentiate between de novo and sMCL cases. Primary solid malignancy subtypes categorized included prostate, breast, colorectal, lung bladder, renal, head and neck, thyroid, testicular, and endometrial cancer. Selected sMCL cases included patients with a diagnosis of a primary solid malignancy with a latency period ≥ 2 months. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the cox regression model to determine the impact of sMCL on survival, adjusting for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, primary solid malignancy subtype type and latency period. Chi square test was utilized to ascertain for any significant difference between de novo MCL and sMCL cases. Results: Overall, 8,889 patients were included: 875 (9.8%) sMCL and 8,014 (90.2%) de novo MCL cases. For de novo MCL, 67.1% were males. Race/ethnicity in descending frequency consisted of Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) (81.8%), Hispanics (8.4%), Blacks (4.4%), Asian and Pacific Islanders(API)(4.1%) and American Indian/Native Indian (AI) (0.4%). The most frequent stage at initial diagnosis for de novo MCL was stage IV (57.9%) followed by stage III (13.4%), stage II (8.1%) and stage I (10.0%). Males consisted of 75.4% of sMCL cases. Cases of sMCL categorized by race/ethnicity in descending frequency were NHW (87.3%), Hispanics (5.1%), Blacks (4.2%), API (3.2%) and AI (0.1%). Stage at diagnosis for sMCL was most frequently stage IV (54.6%), followed by stage III (15.8%), stage II (10.9%) and stage I (11.7%). Compared to de novo MCL, sMCL cases were more likely to occur in patient's ≥75 years (48.3% vs. 28.7%, p<0.01). An absence of extra-nodal involvement at diagnosis was common in both de novo MCL (84.0%) and sMCL (83.7%). Specific to sMCL cases, more than 90% of primary solid malignancies were limited to local/regional involvement. All primary solid malignancy subtypes except for head and neck (48 months) and renal cancer (59 months) had a latency period of greater 5 years. Median OS was significantly worse in sMCL (34 months) compared to de novo MCL (53 months) (HR: 1.375, 95% CI:1.243-1.504). Conclusion: Our analysis demonstrates that elderly age appears to be significantly more common in sMCL cases as compared to de novo MCL. By contrast, race/ethnicity, and extra-nodal involvement were similar between the two groups. Survival was worse in sMCL compared to de novo MCL. This may be due to differences in treatment preferences. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the etiology for such differences in outcomes. Disclosures Kropf: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Tong ◽  
Peter Papagiannopoulos ◽  
Michael Feldman ◽  
Nithin Adappa ◽  
James Palmer

2006 ◽  
Vol preprint (2007) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Kristi Smock ◽  
Hassan Yaish ◽  
Mitchell Cairo ◽  
Mark Lones ◽  
Carlynn Willmore-Payne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document