Extranodal Head and Neck Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942110251
Author(s):  
Christopher T. Breen ◽  
Janet Chao ◽  
Saral Mehra ◽  
Nikita Kohli

Objectives: To describe disease characteristics and treatment and to analyze survival and mortality for extranodal mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) of the head and neck. Methods: Patients with extranodal MCL—excluding primary sites in the salivary glands, eye, and adnexa—were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 Registries (2000-2015). Overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of MCL and non-MCL mortality were calculated. Factors associated with MCL and non-MCL mortality were analyzed with cause-specific hazard models. Results: Five hundred nine patients met criteria for descriptive analysis and 294 patients met criteria for survival analysis, with a median follow-up of 58 months. The most common sites for MCL were the oropharynx (66.0%), nasopharynx (19.1%), and oral cavity (8.4%). The most common treatment received was chemotherapy alone (48.9%), followed by chemoradiation therapy (16.9%), and radiation therapy alone (10.4%). The proportion of cases diagnosed as early-stage disease ranged from 31% of sinonasal MCLs to 83% of laryngeal MCLs. At 5 years, OS was 63% (95% CI: 57%-69%). There was no significant difference in OS ( P = .79), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality ( P = .76), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality ( P = .98) by anatomic site. Comparing early-stage to late-stage disease, there was no significant difference in OS ( P = .38), cumulative incidence of MCL mortality ( P = .07), or cumulative incidence of non-MCL mortality ( P = .14). Multivariate analysis showed increased hazard of MCL mortality for patients that were older or that presented with stage III or stage IV disease. Conclusion: The oropharynx is the most common subsite of head and neck MCLs, followed by the nasopharynx. Primary head and neck MCLs appear to present at an earlier stage than MCLs of other regions. In particular, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal MCLs may present as stage I or II disease.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2717-2717
Author(s):  
Jonathon B. Cohen ◽  
Xuesong Han ◽  
Xin Hu ◽  
Ahmedin Jemal ◽  
Elizabeth Ward ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has traditionally been considered an aggressive lymphoma with shortened survival, the long-term outcomes and initial presentation can be heterogeneous. Martin et al (JCO 2009) reported that 32% of patients with MCL at an academic referral center deferred therapy for at least 3 months, with a median overall survival (OS) of 64 months for patients treated within 90 days of diagnosis and median OS not reached for those who deferred therapy. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to perform a national cohort analysis of the impact of deferred therapy in MCL. Methods: The NCDB is a nationwide oncology outcomes database sponsored by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society, capturing nearly 70% of all newly diagnosed cases of cancer in the United States. We included all patients ≥18 years old who received initial treatment for newly diagnosed MCL in 2004-2011. MCL patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology code 9673 and variables of interest were captured using the Facility Oncology Registry Data Standards. Patients were determined to have received deferred therapy if their time to initial treatment was > 90 days. Chi-square tests were used as appropriate to compare baseline characteristics between immediate and deferred treatment groups, and OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-binomial regression models were developed to identify characteristics associated with deferred treatment and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fit to evaluate the relationship between deferred treatment and OS. Results: Of 8209 patients with MCL, 492 (6.1%) received therapy > 90 days from diagnosis with a median time to treatment for this group of 121 days (range 91-1152). Among all patients, 64% were > 60 years of age, 73% were male, 85% were stage III/IV, and 83% had primarily nodal disease. Additional comorbidities were identified in 22% of patients, and 28% of patients presented with B-symptoms at diagnosis. Approximately 1/3 of patients received therapy in a high volume teaching/research institution. Compared to patients treated within 90 days of diagnosis, patients receiving deferred therapy were more likely to have early stage disease (22% vs 15% p<0.0001), extranodal presentation (24% vs 17%, p<0.0001), to be located in the Northeast region (26% vs 20%, p<0.0001), and to be treated at a high volume teaching/research institution (41% vs 33%, p=0.005). Patients treated within 90 days of diagnosis more commonly had B-symptoms (29% vs 16%, p<0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to gender, age, year of diagnosis, socioeconomic status (based on location of residence), or primary payer. When analyzed in a multivariable model, lack of B-symptoms (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.38-2.03, p < 0.0001) and extra-nodal status (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.53, p = 0.0468) were two strong clinical predictors of deferred therapy. Multivariable analysis demonstrated improved OS for patients who received deferred therapy (HR 0.79: 95% CI 0.67-0.93, p = 0.005; See Figure 1). Additional significant predictors of improved OS included age ≤ 60 years (HR 0.60: 95% CI 0.54-0.66, p < 0.0001), early stage disease (HR 0.66: 95% CI 0.59-0.74, p < 0.0001), lack of B-symptoms (HR 0.75: 95% CI 0.70-0.81, p < 0.0001), and lack of comorbidities (HR 0.63: 95% CI 0.58-0.68, p < 0.0001). Non-Hispanic black patients had inferior OS compared to the other racial/ethnic groups. Among patients who deferred therapy, male gender (p=0.046), age ≤ 60 years (p=0.0002) and lack of comorbidities (p<0.0001) were associated with improved OS, while remaining variables including region, stage, race, B-symptoms, and extranodal presentation were not. Discussion: This national cohort analysis supports prior reports that deferred therapy in MCL is safe for a subgroup of patients with MCL. We found that deferred therapy > 90 days was associated with improved OS and that lack of B-symptoms was a strong predictor for deferred therapy. Predictors of improved survival for patients deferring therapy included young age and lack of comorbidities. These data support use of watchful waiting approach for well-selected newly diagnosed MCL patients. Figure 1. Overall survival for newly diagnosed patients with mantle cell lymphoma based on time to initiation of therapy. Figure 1. Overall survival for newly diagnosed patients with mantle cell lymphoma based on time to initiation of therapy. Disclosures Cohen: BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding. Flowers:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy; Spectrum: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celegene: Other: Unpaid consultant, Research Funding; OptumRx: Consultancy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19566-e19566
Author(s):  
Apoorva Jayarangaiah ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Tarek N. Elrafei ◽  
Lewis Steinberg ◽  
Abhishek Kumar

e19566 Background: Limited stage mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (stage I-II) is rare and occurs in 5-15% of patients. The ideal treatment approach among radiation (RT), chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or close monitoring (NT) has not been defined. Methods: A retrospective analysis of SEER database (1975 to 2018) was conducted for patients with stage I-II MCL to compare overall survival (OS) among the various treatment modalities in patients >18 years. We excluded patients lacking information on demographic characteristics and survival. Patients were analyzed in 4 groups; RT only, CT only, CRT and no treatment groups. ANOVA test and Chi-square test were used to evaluate parametric and non-parametric variables between groups, respectively. Cancer specific survival (CSS) and OS were assessed by Kaplan-Meier. SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. Results: There were in total 2266 patients with limited stage MCL. Median age was 71 years (61-78.25) and predominantly male (65.7%). Stage I MCL was noted in 55.6% and stage II in 44.4% of the patients. The number of patients in each group; RT only, CT only, CRT and NT along with the OS are presented in Table. CSS among these four groups showed no statistically significant differences (p <0.26). OS showed that CT only group has worse survival compared to RT only and CRT groups (p <0.001). CRT has no significant difference in survival compared to RT only (p<0.001). NT was associated with poorest survival rates (p<0.001). Conclusions: In limited stage MCL, RT only and CRT resulted in superior OS compared to CT only. Results suggest a role for incorporation of RT in treatment regimens. One limitation of the study is that the SEER database lacks the ability to distinguish between no receipt of therapy versus lack of availability of data.[Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5410-5410
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Ying Han ◽  
Jianliang Yang ◽  
Xiaohui He ◽  
Changgong Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a worse prognosis compared to the younger population, since older age is associated with comorbidity and suboptimal performance status leading to intolerance of chemo-immunotherapy. The outcome of DLBCL in the older patients (> 60 years) was well described in clinical trials with reported 5-year overall survival (OS) of 50-80% (Coiffier et al., N Engl J Med 2002). Since this group is often precluded from clinical trials and population-based studies are limited, optimal treatment strategy for the old patients with DLBCL remains controversial. Here, we describe a Chinese real-world experience of management of elderly DLBCL patients treated at National Cancer Hospital, China. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive DLBCL patients aged ≥60 who planned to receive chemotherapy +/- rituximab. The standard regimens included 3-4 cycles (early stage disease) or 6 cycles (advanced) of R-CHOP like regimens (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) followed by two rituximab doses in fit patients; R-miniCHOP for unfit and R-CE(etoposide)OP for frail elder patients. Patient data including baseline characteristics, histology, clinical parameters, and treatment outcomes were extracted from hospital medical records. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoint was OS. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and Kaplan Meier estimates. Results: From June 2006 to December 2012, 349 patients aged ≥60 years were included, in which 204 patients were aged <70 years (Table 1). 326 patients received chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy with rituximab. Median follow up was 82 months. Five year PFS and OS of the elder patients were 45.8% and 51.9%, respectively. Significant difference was seen between patients < 70 years and those ≥70 years in terms of PFS (51.0% vs 38.6%, p=0.030) and OS (58.3% vs 42.8%, p=0.007) (Figure 1). Patients with early-stage disease (Ann Arbor StageⅠ/Ⅱ) had better 5-year PFS (60.1% vs 23.5%, p<0.001) and OS (65.3% vs 30.9%, p<0.001) than patients with advanced disease stage (Ann Arbor Stage III/IV) (Figure2). In addition, regimen including rituximab significantly improved the survival than chemotherapy alone (5-year PFS: 37.3% vs 64.0%, p<0.001; 5-year OS: 44.5% vs 69.3%, p<0.001), especially in patients ≥70 years, which almost doubled 5-year PFS and OS (5-year PFS: 25.4% vs 50.7%, p<0.001; 5-year OS: 28.8% vs 56.0%, p<0.001) (Figure3). Conclusions: Elder age (≥70 years) and advanced disease stage (Ann Arbor Stage III/IV) are associated with poor PFS and OS in Chinese elder DLBCL patients. The addition of rituximab significantly improves the survival compared to chemotherapy alone, especially in patients aged ≥70 years. These findings underscore the importance of personalized evaluation and treatment in elder patients with DLBCL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Filipa Saraiva ◽  
Christopher J. Saunders ◽  
Margarida Fevereiro ◽  
Alexandra Monteiro ◽  
Aida B Sousa

Introduction: According to the WHO classification, primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct entity, which has a close relationship with nodular sclerosing classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) in terms of clinical and molecular characteristics and sharing an excellent prognosis. When PMBCL is treated with R-CHOP, the addition of radiotherapy (RT) turns more than 90% of positron emission tomography (PET) positive cases into complete remissions (CR) and increases 5-year overall survival (OS) to 93%. However, the fear of potential late toxicities due to RT, has led an increasing number of centers to favor more intensive regimens like DA-EPOCH-R without RT. This controversy is deepened by the recent comparison between the latter regime with R-CHOP, unfavorable to the DA-EPOCH-R for toxicity reasons. Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and late toxicities of R-CHOP plus RT in our center and secondarily compare these results with the ones obtained in our cHL patients with bulky and early stage disease. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with PMBCL treated between Jan/2007 and Dec/2017 according to clinical characteristics, late toxicities, rate of CR, OS and disease-free survival (DFS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In 32 patients with a median age of 34 years (23-70), 56% were male, 91% had limited stage and 6% had an unfavorable IPI. The rate of CR was 91% (2 patients needed second line therapy to achieve CR) with 2 relapses (at 6 and 11 months, respectively) rescued with autologous transplantation. Three deaths were recorded due to disease progression. With a median follow-up of 86 months, OS and DFS at 10 years were 91% and 93%, respectively. As for late toxicities, besides 2 cases of severe pulmonary fibrosis, there were no other relevant late toxicities registered. These results overlap those obtained in our cHL patients with bulky and early stage disease treated with Stanford V plus RT with an OS and an event free survival of 93% and 84%, respectively. Conclusion: These results support PMBCL's excellent prognosis, parallel to that of cHL. Given the low probability of late toxicities with this regimen our data uphold against the therapeutic strategy of more intensive regimens, that have an increased management complexity and are clinically more toxic. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 4059-4066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Yawalkar ◽  
Katalin Ferenczi ◽  
David A. Jones ◽  
Keiichi Yamanaka ◽  
Ki-Young Suh ◽  
...  

Abstract Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a malignancy of skin-homing T cells. A major feature of CTCL is profound immunosuppression, such that patients with advanced mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome have been compared with patients with advanced HIV disease and are susceptible to opportunistic infection. The etiology of this immunosuppression is unclear. We analyzed peripheral blood T cells of patients with CTCL with stage I to IV disease, using a sensitive beta-variable complementarity-determining region 3 spectratyping approach. Our data revealed a profound disruption of the complexity of the T-cell repertoire, which was universally observed in patients with advanced disease (stages III and IV), and present in up to 50% of patients with early-stage disease (stages I and II). In most patients, multiple monoclonal and oligoclonal complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) spectratype patterns in many different beta-variable families were seen. Equally striking was a reduction of normal T cells (as judged by absolute CD4 counts) across multiple beta-variable families. In general, CTCL spectratypes were reminiscent of advanced HIV spectratypes published elsewhere. Taken together, these data are most consistent with a global assault on the T-cell repertoire in patients with CTCL, a process that can be observed even in early-stage disease. (Blood. 2003;102:4059-4066)


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4136-4136
Author(s):  
Agata Magdalena Wasik ◽  
Elin Marin ◽  
Magali Merrien ◽  
Joana de Matos Rodrigues ◽  
Martin Lord ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with a median survival of 3-5 years. Most cases express SOX11, a transcription factor associated with MCL pathobiology, which serves as a diagnostic marker. Current standard first-line therapy for younger MCL patients is rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and cytarabine (Ara-C), consolidated with high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which is associated with prolonged survival (Eskelund et al. Br J Haematol 2016). Ara-C metabolizes into its active triphosphate form Ara-CTP which inhibits proliferation of the malignant cells. Recent reports suggest that the expression of the mammalian dNTPs hydrolase SAMHD1 determines response to Ara-C in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by hydrolyzing Ara-CTP and thus by diminishing the anti-proliferative properties of Ara-C. Consequently, in vitro downregulation of SAMHD1 resulted in sensitization of AML cells to Ara-C (Herold et al., Nat Med 2017). SAMHD1 also exhibits anti-tumor properties via regulation of dNTP pool and is recurrently mutated in CLL (Clifford et al. Blood 2014) and T-PLL (Johansson et al. Blood Cancer J. 2018). In CLL a role in DNA-repair has been suggested (Clifford et al. Blood 2014). Thus, SAMHD1 may function as a tumor suppressor. In this study, we investigated for the first time the expression patterns of SAMHD1 in MCL and its association to clinical outcome, especially in patients receiving Ara-C as part of induction for ASCT. Methods SAMHD1 and SOX11 expression was investigated by qPCR, WB and IHC on whole tissue sections or tissue microarrays. MCL cell lines were treated with gene-specific siRNA for SAMHD1 or SOX11. Data on overall survival (OS) was retrieved from patient records. For patients included in the Nordic MCL2 and MCL3 trials data on progression free survival (PFS) and OS were retrieved. Results Initial IHC showed that expression of SAMHD1 is high in normal T-cells and macrophages and low in cells in the mantle zones of reactive tonsils. Co-staining with CD20 in a heterogeneously treated cohort of primary MCL (n=104) showed a large variation between cases (median 73.15%, range: 0.4%-99.6%) and the staining intensity was lower than in T-cells. Sixty two/104 samples were also evaluated for SOX11 expression and the percentage of SOX11 positive cells moderately correlated with SAMHD1 expression (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.27, p=0.036). Analysis of mRNA expression (normalized to mRNA levels of respective genes in Granta519 cell line) of SAMHD1 (median RFI: 2.09, range: 0.18-10.69) and SOX11 (median RFI: 2.00, range: 0.00-7.11) in flow cytometry sorted primary MCL cells (n=19) showed a trend for correlation (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.45, p=0.053). However, downregulation of SOX11 by siRNA did not alter the expression of SAMHD1 and neither did downregulation of SAMHD1 by siRNA change the expression of SOX11 suggesting that the observed correlation is not due to a mutual regulation. We investigated the relation of SAMHD1 expression to clinical and pathological parameters in this cohort and found no correlation to OS, blastoid morphology, proliferation (% Ki67+ tumor cells) nor p53 positivity (>20% positively stained cells). Further, a cohort of patients treated within the Nordic MCL2 and MCL3 protocols (n=51) were investigated for SAMHD1 expression by IHC. Interestingly the distribution of SAMHD1 expression was different in this cohort (median 34.9%, range: 2.2%-97.1%; Mann-Whitney p=0.0019). Survival analysis showed a trend for better PFS and OS in patients with high (>75% SAMHD1 positive cells) and low (<25% positive cells) SAMHD1, although the differences were not significant (Kaplan-Meier with log rank test, p=0.053). Conclusions In MCL the expression of SAMHD1 varies over a broad range and correlates to expression of SOX11. However, no significant difference in PFS or OS among patients receiving Ara-C containing induction chemotherapy is found in this study. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4358-4358
Author(s):  
Anna Abrahamsson ◽  
Alexandra Albertsson Lindblad ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
Stefanie Baumgartner Wennerholm ◽  
Lars Moller Pedersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is a consensus that younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) should receive intensive immunochemotherapy regimens including high-dose cytarabine, rituximab and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support, but the optimization of treatment for elderly or unfit patients, as well as patients with localized or indolent disease, remains a challenge. Methods Our study is based on data from the Swedish and Danish Lymphoma Registries from the period of 2000-2011, in Sweden supplemented by review of patients´ records. The Lymphoma Registries comprise >95% of all diagnosed lymphoma patients in Sweden and Denmark. Results 1389 patients were diagnosed with MCL, confirmed by positive cyclin-D1 and CD5 staining, in Sweden and Denmark between 2000 and 2011. In this population based cohort, we could confirm the prognostic impact of MIPI, but in addition, male sex was associated with inferior overall survival (OS) in multivariate analysis (HR 1.4, p<0.001). Treatment with the Nordic MCL2 regimen (n=324) was associated with superior outcome compared to the majority of other regimens (3-year OS: 80%). In patients >65 years, chlorambucil (n=132) was superior to CVP (n=35) (HR 1.8, p=0.003), when adjusted for MIPI and rituximab, but there was no significant difference between CHOP (n=311) and CHOP+Cytarabine (n=84). Rituximab (HR 1.5, p<0.001) and autologous stem cell transplantation (HR 1.9, p<0.001 ) per se were both associated with prolonged OS in multivariate analysis. Forty-three (3.1%) patients with stage I-II disease received radiotherapy as primary treatment with curative intent showing an estimated 3-year OS of 93%. A small proportion, 29 patients (2.1%), were followed without treatment. Estimated 3-year OS for this group of patients was 79%. Conclusion By a population-based approach, we were able to provide novel data on prognostic factors and primary treatment of MCL, applicable to routine clinical practice. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5057-5057
Author(s):  
Samir Dalia ◽  
Julio C Chavez ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Paul A. Chervenick ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare B-cell malignancy that usually presents in stage III-IV disease (classical) with poor outcomes even with aggressive therapy. Rarely, patients present with localized disease and the role of localized or systemic therapy remains a clinical choice. Purpose To assess outcomes in our patients with early stage MCL with a focus on treatment approaches. Methods Patients with early stage (Ann Arbor Stage I or II) between 1992 and 2012 were identified through our MCL database. Demographic , treatment, and outcomes data was collected for each patient. Cox regression was used to identify risk factors for progression and survival. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS), and comparisons were estimated using the log rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results From our database of 300 patients with MCL, 34 were identified to have stage I or II disease (Table 1). 7 received local therapy, consisting of either radiation or resection. 20 received systemic therapy, including 1 who received only rituximab. 7 received a combination of local therapy and systemic therapy, including 2 who received rituximab with radiation. With a median followup of 73.7 months, TTP was 22.8 months and OS was 83.8 months. MIPI could be determined for 56% of the cohort, however, was neither prognostic for TTP or OS. WBC was available for 74% of the cohort, and was prognostic for OS only [HR 1.46 (95%CI 1.02-2.08, p-value=0.04)]. None of the remaining MIPI covariates were prognostic. Ki67 was reported for only 8 patients limiting analysis as a continuous variable. Blastoid/Pleomorphic histology, alternatively, was prognostic for OS [HR 24.5 (95%CI 1.22-25.72, p-value=0.03)], but not TTP. Locally directed therapy was not associated with a decrease in OS or TTP, with some patients showing no evidence of relapse with extended followup (figure 1). Conclusions In our series patients with early stage MCL demonstrated a longer TTP and OS than those with extensive stage disease. The MIPI failed to stratify patients, likely related to small sample size. Aggressive histology may confer a worse prognosis, though, it remains unclear whether this can be abrogated by more intensive management, as all with blastoid/pleomorphic histology received some form of systemic therapy. Notably, as described by others, locally directed therapy did not compromise outcomes, with some showing extended TTP and OS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 217-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Haikel ◽  
N Dawe ◽  
G Lekakis ◽  
M Black ◽  
D Mitchell

In 1998 the UK government published its white paper The New NHS: Modern and Dependable, in which it first suggested that patients being referred with a suspicion of cancer should have a maximum wait of two weeks to see a specialist. The rationale for this was that outcomes for late-stage disease are significantly worse when compared with outcomes for early-stage disease (Table 1). It was assumed that reducing the wait to see a specialist would reduce the stage of disease at presentation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document