Current Issues in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Health: Introduction

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Bogart ◽  
Tracey A. Revenson ◽  
Keith E. Whitfield ◽  
Christopher R. France

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zowie Davy ◽  
Sarah Amsler ◽  
Karen Duncombe

<span style="font-size: 9.0pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif'; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: ES; mso-fareast-language: ES; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">Increasingly, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) health care is becoming an important quality assurance feature of primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare in Britain. While acknowledging these very positive developments, teaching LGBT curricula content is contingent upon having educators understand the complexity of LGBT lives. The study adopted a qualitative mixed method approach. The study investigated how and in what ways barriers and facilitators of providing LGBT medical, health and social care curricula content figure in the accreditation policies and within undergraduate and postgraduate medical and healthcare teaching. This paper illustrates opposing views about curricula inclusion. The evidence presented suggests that LGBT content teaching is often challenged at various points in its delivery. In this respect, we will focus on a number of resistances that sometimes prevents teachers from engaging with and providing the complexities of LGBT curricula content. These include the lack of collegiate, colleague and student cooperation. By investing some time on these often neglected areas of resistance, the difficulties and good practice met by educators will be explored. This focus will make visible how to support medical, health and social care students become aware and confident in tackling contemporaneous health issues for LGBT patients.</span>


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Nagata

In this commentary, I reflect on challenges with conducting global health research internationally as a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) person, grapple with decisions related to coming out in regions with anti-LGBT laws, and outline the risks and benefits of different advocacy options related to the promotion of LGBT health globally. Despite significant advances in LGBT rights in many countries, homosexuality remains illegal in many others. Using a critical medical anthropology framework, I argue that anti-LGBT laws constitute structural violence and have many detrimental consequences including discrimination and violence; poorer mental and physical health outcomes; and risky sexual behaviors. As a global health provider, there are many options for the promotion of LGBT health worldwide.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 100864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linn Jennings ◽  
Chris Barcelos ◽  
Christine McWilliams ◽  
Kristen Malecki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document