Sound Mind, Weak Body

Dean Swift ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 899-908
Author(s):  
Dean Swift
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Frank E. Vandervort ◽  
Vincent J. Palusci

Substance abuse is a major medical and social problem. Estimates suggest that each year some 15 percent of the 4 million babies born in the United States are exposed to drugs or alcohol. Research demonstrates that exposure to these substances is harmful to the children in both the short term and across their developmental trajectory. This chapter summarizes the harms that might result from such prenatal exposure and considers the ways that both federal and state law respond to this. The chapter argues for universal drug testing of newborns in an effort to ascertain whether they have been prenatally exposed to such substances so that treatment and other services can be provided.


2021 ◽  
pp. 096777202110440
Author(s):  
Jonathan R.T. Davidson ◽  
Roger Hart

Bernard Hart was among the most eminent 20th-century British psychiatrists. Following medical qualification at University College Hospital, London, he trained in psychiatry, which included two years studying in Paris and Zurich. He was appointed as the first psychiatric consultant at University College Hospital, then spent some time in Liverpool, where he specialized in treating war neurosis. Early in his career, Hart was one of the first to introduce the ideas of Freud and Janet, and the importance of unconscious processes, to the British public. After the First World War, Hart returned to University College Hospital, where he remained until 1947, building up a flourishing department. Hart was appointed to numerous senior offices and directed the psychiatric section of the British Emergency Medical Services in the Second World War. Hart is believed to be the last psychiatrist to certify someone (John Amery) as being of sufficiently sound mind to die for treason.


Author(s):  
V Bhavani ◽  
N Prabhavathy Devi

Background: Adequate and balanced nourishment is vital for upholding health and quality of life. Maintaining the right eating habits of college students means a lot for the prevention of many diseases that could occur in the adult period. Thus the purpose of the study is to assess the junk food consumption of college students.Aim: To study the dietary habits concerning junk food consumption of college studentsResults: About 16% consume junk foods daily. Hungry was the main reason to consume junk foods; Ice cream was the most preferred food for most of the participants. Majority of the participant mentioned taste as the major factor influencing the food intake.Conclusion: Nutrition professionals should take up the role and spread awareness in the general public and give them better guidance. A well-balanced diet, periodic physical activity, sufficient sleep, with good life style habits help in sound mind and healthy body leading to a happy life.


1935 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-272
Author(s):  
Hadley Cantril
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Daniele Bryden

The basic presumption of the Mental Capacity Act that an individual has capacity to make decisions regarding treatment is frequently challenged within intensive care practice where individuals are often incapacitated due to the nature of their condition or treatment for it. Because many conditions are life-threatening, treatment is frequently administered on the basis of an assumption that it provides an overall benefit to the person and that their interests are best served by preservation of life. There is now a statutory definition of best interests although factors in its determination can at times be opaque, which suggests a gradual move towards the US-based ‘substituted judgement’ test. An individual can be lawfully prevented from leaving the intensive care unit while receiving intensive care treatment provided that treatment is given in good faith and is materially the same as would be given to a person of sound mind with the same physical illness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Morse ◽  
Robin Fretwell Wilson

This Essay examines the elegantly simple idea that consent to medical treatment or participation in human research must be “informed” to be valid. It does so by using as a case study the controversial clinical research trial known as the Surfactant, Positive Pressure, and Oxygenation Randomized Trial (“SUPPORT”). The Essay begins by charting, through case law and the adoption of the common rule, the evolution of duties to secure fully informed consent in both research and treatment. The Essay then utilizes the SUPPORT study, which sought to pinpoint the level of saturated oxygen that should be provided to extremely low birth weight infants to demonstrate modern complexities and shortcomings of the duty to secure informed consent. This Essay shows how the duty is measured by foreseeability of risks and benefits in human research and why federal regulators believed the tradeoffs in risk and benefits from differing oxygen levels administered in the support study were foreseeable. It then explores the contours of the duty to secure informed consent when applied to researchers who also serve as treating physicians, highlighting how common law duties differ in jurisdictions that apply the professional standard and those that apply the patient-centered material risk standard. This Essay provides new insight into what the law must do to make real the notion that [e]very human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his body.”


1936 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 198-199
Author(s):  
Esther E. Richmond
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document