An Overview of Alternative Assessment Measures for Gifted Learners and the Issues That Surround Their Use

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Joyce VanTassel-Baska
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Hong Minh

Assessment is a complex process dependent upon an entire network of practices. It presumes a variety of strategies and procedures and requires multiple indicatorsand sources of evidence. There are two methods of assessement: Traditional assessments and Alternative assessments. Each one has its own potential for enhancing student learning. Traditional assessment is used to determine what students know at the end of a chapter, unit, or series of lectures on a topic in which assessment measures emphasize the interconnections, coherence, and understanding among skills, concepts, and procedures, as well as among knowledge, abilities, and dispositions. We can assess with the goal of increasing that learning. In fact we should think of assessment as a means for enhancing student learning aligns assessment with instruction.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Nicole M. Etter

Traditionally, speech-language pathologists (SLP) have been trained to develop interventions based on a select number of perceptual characteristics of speech without or through minimal use of objective instrumental and physiologic assessment measures of the underlying articulatory subsystems. While indirect physiological assumptions can be made from perceptual assessment measures, the validity and reliability of those assumptions are tenuous at best. Considering that neurological damage will result in various degrees of aberrant speech physiology, the need for physiologic assessments appears highly warranted. In this context, do existing physiological measures found in the research literature have sufficient diagnostic resolution to provide distinct and differential data within and between etiological classifications of speech disorders and versus healthy controls? The goals of this paper are (a) to describe various physiological and movement-related techniques available to objectively study various dysarthrias and speech production disorders and (b) to develop an appreciation for the need for increased systematic research to better define physiologic features of dysarthria and speech production disorders and their relation to know perceptual characteristics.


1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 772-773
Author(s):  
Nancy Ewald Jackson
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan L. Herman ◽  
Davina C. D. Klein ◽  
Tamela M. Heath ◽  
Sara T. Wakai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document