Developing Mathematical Talent in Your Students

2021 ◽  
pp. 39-51
Author(s):  
M. Katherine Gavin ◽  
Joseph S. Renzulli
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Natalia Bonchuk

The article is devoted to the formation and improvement of competencies of teachers and psychologists of secondary schools to identify and develop mathematically gifted students. It has been identified the components of the training program of basic competencies that psychologists and subject teachers must have to recognize and develop mathematical talent. The results of an empirical study of an educational project are online training for educators to deepen their theoretical knowledge of mathematical talent and the development of practical skills of organizing the educational process for students with a high level of ability in the field of exact sciences. It was found that training in the development of competencies is an effective way to improve the skills of teachers to understand the essence of talent, the peculiarities of its detection in students, prevention of loss of potential, development of individual educational trajectories, use of new learning technologies and ways to develop personal skills.


1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Travers

Julian C. Stanley, Daniel P. Keating, and Lynn H. Fox (Eds.). Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description and Development. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974. xvii + 215 pp. $ 10.00 and $2.95 (paperback).


2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zalman Usiskin

From some schools come many students very talented in certain areas, while from others come none. These results, far beyond what any statistical variability would explain, suggest that talent is developed to a greater extent than is popularly believed. Here we identify seven distinct levels of talent in mathematics and describe the enormous effort needed to move from any level to the next higher. The magnitude of effort and guidance required helps explain why most people view their own ability to reach higher levels of mathematical talent as unrealistic. We also point out that Srinivasa Ramanujan, the extraordinarily intuitive Indian mathematician who is sometimes thought to be the prime example of a self-taught mathematician, did not learn in isolation, but had good schooling and had carefully studied a comprehensive advanced mathematical text. Consequently, we suggest that teachers interested in the gifted view themselves as developing students into being talented at least as much as developing students who are already talented.


2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Nava L. Livne ◽  
Roberta M. Milgram

The authors distinguished both theoretically and empirically between academic and creative abilities in mathematics. The former was postulated as intelligence applied to mathematics and the latter as creative thinking, operationally defined as ideational fluency, applied to mathematics. The findings of a large-scale study of 10th and 11th grade students (N = 1,090) conducted in Israel indicated that creative thinking constitutes a necessary but not sufficient component in creative thinking in mathematics. The practical implications of these findings are that it would be worthwhile to add reliable measures of both general creative thinking and domain-specific creative ability in mathematics, such as the ones developed in the current study, to IQ scores and school grades in order to identify pupils with such abilities and to help them realize their mathematical talent.


1935 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  

William Barlow was born in Islington, London, on August 8, 1845, and inherited from his father, Frederick Barlow, a business dealing with estate and building property ; by the exercise of notable acumen in affairs he realized the business and thus found himself early in life possessed of considerable means. Barlow was educated privately ; he had a taste for physical science and marked mathematical talent, but cultivated the latter unsystematically and perhaps rather too exclusively. Barlow thus found himself in his early thirties with an independence, with a genius for handling geometrical problems of a particular kind, and with ample leisure to devote to the study of crystal structure, which had become the subject of his choice. He had not, however, received that rigid disciplinary training through which most students of physics and chemistry acquire a broad sense of contemporary knowledge of the physical universe. In some respects this was a hindrance, but in others an advantage ; it left a powerful intellect unhampered by authority and led a logical mind to pursue its inquiries into difficult and obscure paths which might intimidate the more conventionally trained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document