Equity Ownership Structure and Firm Performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-73
Author(s):  
Hoang N. Pham ◽  
Sardar M. N. Islam
2004 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor Chin ◽  
Ed Vos ◽  
Quin Casey

The relationship between firm performance and board composition, size and equity ownership structure are investigated in this paper for a sample of 426 annual observations of New Zealand firms across a five-year period. No statistically significant relationships could be found. These results are consistent with several previous studies and cast doubt on agency explanations used to relate board ownership to corporate performance. This may be due to endogenous factors or due to the small size of the New Zealand pool of corporate directors.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laila Mohamed Alshawadfy Aladwey

Purpose This paper aims to examine the effect of different modes of equity ownership structure in unconditional conservatism of financial reporting for non-financial listed companies in Egypt. Design/methodology/approach Using a large sample of Egyptian non-financial listed companies for the period from 2011–2018, this paper used the ordinary least square regression model to test the impact of equity ownership equity on accounting conservatism based on an accrual-based measure developed by Givoly and Hayn (2000) and Ahmed and Duellman (2007). Findings The paper finds that, on average, Egyptian listed companies tend to demonstrate lower levels of unconditional conservatism during the period from 2011–2018. Regarding the different patterns of equity shareholding, a negative association between unconditional conservatism and managerial ownership is found. Briefly, the mild equity shareholding of managers in Egyptian listed companies is accompanied by higher demand for conservative reporting. Besides, a negative association is also reported for the relationship between concentrated ownership and unconditional conservatism in which the concentration of shareholding by a few numbers of individual investors lessen the demand for conservatism. By contrast, a non-significance relationship is reported neither for institutional shareholders nor for governmental ownership in their relationship with unconditional conservatism. Research limitations/implications The paper does not take into account the modifications conducted on the Egyptian accounting standards according to decree number 69 for the year of 2019 because they were not valid until the publishing of this paper. It considers only non-conditional conservatism. Practical implications First, the paper provides clear empirical evidence that Egyptian listed companies are adopting less-conservative accounting policies in their financial reporting during a high-tension period that witnessed several radical political and economic events. This evidence should stimulate regulators and policymakers to revisit the reporting standards to improve the quality of financial information and should also guide investors’ decisions because it helps in clarifying their interpretation of figures and trends reported in financial statements. Second, the paper would direct the attention of the Egyptian government to the importance of increasing their investment in the stock market to enhance its regulatory role. Third, it gives some implications to investors and policymakers toward the shape of the relationship between accounting conservatism and each pattern of equity shareholding in Egypt. Originality/value This paper visualizes an image toward the current state of equity ownership structure for listed companies in Egypt within a period that witnessed critical vulnerabilities and irregularities. In addition, it addresses how the accounting conservatism would be shaped according to the different types of equity shareholdings in Egypt.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley John Stevens

This article provides an overview of the impact of raising capital on the equity ownership structure of a biotechnology company. The equity ownership structure as captured in a table of capitalization determines how the fruits of success will be divided between founders, management and investors at an exit event such as an acquisition or initial public offering. The evolution of the Cap Table is captured and described through multiple financing events and scenarios and illustrates how value is allocated to the various parties involved in the transactions as the company grows and develops.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 49-61
Author(s):  
Bingsheng Yi ◽  
Jang Shee Barry Lin ◽  
Jane Mooney

This paper applies a more robust methodology in industry-adjustment on measuring firm performance as related to ownership structure. We consider insider ownership, institutional ownership, and blockholder ownership. Even after controlling for the endogeneity of insider ownership, we still find positive effect of insider ownership on firm performance, which is conflicting with results found by other recent studies. We find a non-linearity in the relationship between insider ownership and firm performance, but our results do not support a relationship as neat as the inverse U-shape effect found by earlier studies. Our results indicate that the effects of the insider and square of insider on performance are positive, yet the effect of the cubic of insider ownership on firm performance is negative. As no other study based on U.S. data used the cubic of insider ownership and document its effect, our finding is new. We find strong negative effect of blockholder ownership on firm performance, and our results indicate that institutional investors are efficient monitors whose existence helps improving firm value and protecting outside minority shareholders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document