Predicting the Future Driving Style of Novice Drivers: The Role of Self-evaluation and Instructors’ Ratings Following Driver Training

Author(s):  
Łukasz Tomczyk

The objective of the research was to obtain data on the attitudes of the future generation of teachers towards using new media in their didactic and educational activities. Additionally, the text presents the level of their self-evaluation regarding the use of new ICT-based devices. Indicators of both variables are compared. The research was conducted in the biggest Polish pedagogical university, in the sample of 450 students. The technique used was the diagnostic survey. The data were collected in the first half of 2019 as part of the international project SELI. Based on the data obtained, it was noticed that pre-service teachers do not form a homogeneous group, which means there are individuals presenting a very positive attitudes towards introduction of new media as well as people who are careful when it comes to using ICT in teaching. Most respondents emphasize that using ICT in education is necessary and this trend is irreversible. There is a minor group of the future teachers who do not know websites and software to support learning and teaching (about 10%). Almost half of the respondents present divided views regarding the role of ICT in stimulating engagement, motivation and interest among the students. However, it should also be noted that almost half of the interviewees states that using smartphones at school should be banned. Positive attitude to new technologies in one area coincides with high opinion about ICT in other areas. Self-evaluation of own competencies is also internally coherent. It means that students who declared that they have no problems with using, for example, new devices, have no problems with using new websites or software.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14
Author(s):  
Eko Hadi Gunawan ◽  
Muhammad Galih Wonoseto ◽  
Sekar Minati ◽  
Muhammad Taufiq Nuruzzaman

The success of JISKa is inseparable from the role of reviewers and authors. Unfortunately, JISKa had never been assessed or evaluated by reviewers and authors despite the fact that assessment from the reviewers and authors would be valuable feedback for JISKa’s self-evaluation. Therefore, survey-based research has recently been conducted to assess JISKa’s performance using the User Acceptance Test of OJS version 2.4.8.0. This study used a survey method to obtain an assessment and evaluation from reviewers and authors related to JISKa.The respondents in this study consist of 68 authors and 26 reviewers. The result of this study stated that 91.2% of the authors and 84.6% of reviewers are satisfied with JISKa. A percentage number of 100% of writers and reviewers wants JISKa to raise its level of Sinta accreditation. This accreditation is awarded in 2018 and will end in 2023. JISKa is now on Sinta 4.The JISKa website appearance looks good and easy to use. The dashboard on the JISKa page is user-friendly for the author. However, the current version of JISKa OJS 2.4.8.0 needs to be upgraded to OJS version 3. There are some points for the future consideration of JISKa: JISKa needs to promote itself more, upgrade the OJS version, and provide the reviewers with certificates of appreciation for future consideration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina B. Lonsdorf ◽  
Jan Richter

Abstract. As the criticism of the definition of the phenotype (i.e., clinical diagnosis) represents the major focus of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, it is somewhat surprising that discussions have not yet focused more on specific conceptual and procedural considerations of the suggested RDoC constructs, sub-constructs, and associated paradigms. We argue that we need more precise thinking as well as a conceptual and methodological discussion of RDoC domains and constructs, their interrelationships as well as their experimental operationalization and nomenclature. The present work is intended to start such a debate using fear conditioning as an example. Thereby, we aim to provide thought-provoking impulses on the role of fear conditioning in the age of RDoC as well as conceptual and methodological considerations and suggestions to guide RDoC-based fear conditioning research in the future.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Bartels ◽  
Oleg Urminsky ◽  
Shane Frederick
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi ◽  
Jeanne Nakamura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document