Material rhetoric

Author(s):  
Pietari Kääpä
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-224
Author(s):  
BART B. BRUEHLER

2 Cor 9.6–15 is crucial for understanding Paul's collection for Jerusalem, and this investigation exegetically examines the text while giving particular attention to three dimensions: sapiential material, rhetoric, and the socio-economic nature of the Corinthian church. The study concludes that the sapiential material comes from a Hellenistic Jewish background, though it shares affinities with Greco-Roman themes. Paul employs deliberative logos in vv. 6–10 as he addresses those in the lower socio-economic levels of the church, while he primarily employs pathos in vv. 12–14 and addresses those in the higher socio-economic levels of the church.


2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 60-72
Author(s):  
Cheryl Forbes
Keyword(s):  
The Body ◽  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Hawhee ◽  
Cory Holding

This essay offers “material rhetoric” as a new addition to the usual list of categories used to describe rhetoric in the eighteenth century (neoclassical, belletristic, elocutionary, epistemological/psychological) by examining the material elements of treatises written by Joseph Priestley and Gilbert Austin. Those material elements—namely heat, passion, and impression—are tracked through Priestley and Austin's scientific writings, thereby positioning their particular strains of material rhetoric as legacies of philosophical chemistry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-427
Author(s):  
Jordan Frith

Infrastructures support and shape our social world, but they do so in often invisible ways. In few cases is that truer than with various documents that serve infrastructural functions. This article takes one type of those documents—technical standards—and uses analysis of one specific standard to develop theory related to the infrastructural function of writing. The author specifically analyzes one of the major infrastructures of the Internet of Things—the 126-page Tag Data Standard (TDS)—to show how rethinking writing as infrastructure can be valuable for multiple conversations occurring with writing studies, including research on material rhetoric, research that expands the scope of what should be studied as writing, and research in writing studies that links with emerging fields. The author concludes by developing a model for future research on the infrastructural functions of writing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document