Authenticity and personal openness in the therapy relationship

2020 ◽  
pp. 237-252
Author(s):  
Michiel van Vreeswijk
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
pp. 53-76
Author(s):  
Michael Sullivan ◽  
Thomas M. Skovholt ◽  
Len Jennings

Qualitative research methods were used to elicit master therapists' statements regarding their use and understanding of the therapy relationship. The master therapists were identified and recruited in a previous study (Jennings & Skovholt, 1999) through a procedure used to create a sample of information-rich cases. The result of the analysis is a Model of Relationship Stances. The Safe Relationship Domain is composed of three categories of therapist actions: Responding, Collaborating, and Joining. The Challenging Relationship Domain also is composed of three categories of therapist actions: Using Self, Engaging, and Objectivity. The domains and categories are conceptualized as relationship stances utilized by the master therapists to meet individual client needs.


Author(s):  
Barry A. Farber ◽  
Jessica Y. Suzuki ◽  
David A. Lynch

This chapter meta-analytically reviews the research on the association between therapist positive regard and treatment outcome. The history of the construct of unconditional positive regard in client-centered theory, as well as the efforts to operationalize and measure this construct, are reviewed. Several clinical examples are presented. The meta-analysis, which features 64 studies, yielded a small positive association between positive regard and treatment outcome, g = 0.28. To control for the repeated use of data sets and study samples within the database, a multilevel meta-analysis was adopted that indicated a stronger relation between positive regard and clinical outcome, g = 0.36. These analyses support positive regard’s standing as a significant component of the therapy relationship that leads to improved clinical outcomes. The chapter concludes with limitations of the research, patient contributions, diversity considerations, and practice recommendations.


Author(s):  
Paul L. Wachtel ◽  
Gregory J. Gagnon

This chapter covers an integrative psychotherapy known as cyclical psychodynamics and features its origins, applicability, assessment, treatment, therapy relationship, case example, outcome research, and future directions. Cyclical psychodynamics is an approach to theory and therapy that centers on the repetitive interaction cycles that maintain adaptive and maladaptive patterns of living. Employing concepts and methods from psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, systemic, and humanistic-experiential perspectives, the aim is to interrupt these cycles to enable the person not only to be relieved of distressing symptoms but to live more fully and richly. A key focus is on how the person unwittingly recruits “accomplices” in the maintenance of the pattern through the behaviors his actions evoke in others. Also central is attention to the ways that early attachment experiences lead some of our thoughts, wishes, and feelings to be cast into the background, rendered difficult to access consciously or to draw upon adaptively in one’s life. The therapy proceeds integratively, attending both to the expansion of subjective experience and to more adaptive daily behavior, as well as to how each promotes the other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document