Goal Systems Theory: Integrating the Cognitive and Motivational Aspects of Self-Regulation

2003 ◽  
pp. 255-284
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle M. Turner-McGrievy ◽  
Julie A. Wright ◽  
Jeffrey P. Migneault ◽  
Lisa Quintiliani ◽  
Robert H. Friedman

Author(s):  
C. L. S. Pury ◽  
C. B. Starkey ◽  
C. R. Breeden ◽  
H. J. Murphy ◽  
C. L. Kelley

Author(s):  
IpKin Anthony Wong ◽  
Yim King Penny Wan ◽  
GuoQiong Ivanka Huang ◽  
Shanshan Qi

Author(s):  
Johannes Knoll ◽  
Jörg Matthes ◽  
Raffael Heiss

Although studies suggest that the use of social media can promote political participation (PP), there is a lack of theorizing about the psychological processes underlying this relationship. This article attempts to fill this gap by suggesting a social media political participation model. Taking a goal systemic perspective, the model specifies a set of interrelated processes that need to be realized so that social media use affects PP. Furthermore, key contingent conditions are outlined and insights into fostering PP are offered. The article explains ways of testing the model with surveys and experiments. Implications for future research are discussed.


This edited volume is the first to present a cohesive account of adaptation to chronic pain from a motivational perspective. Across the 15 chapters, scholars from diverse domains of psychology explore the multileveled and bidirectional nature of pain and motivation, drawing from a broad array of constructs, including self-regulation, goal systems, cognitive control, attention, conflict, interpersonal processes, coping, conditioning, and stress reactivity. Also addressed is the relation between pain and psychopathology, the nature of pain-affect dynamics, and the neural mechanisms underlying the pain experience. Applied considerations are presented in chapters on Motivational Interviewing, ACT, Internet-based methods, and related clinical topics. Our volume provides an up-to-date compendium of cutting-edge research and interventions that collectively illustrate the utility of viewing chronic pain as neither a “disease” nor an imposed lifestyle, but as the emergent and potentially flexible product of a complex transactional system that is bounded by sociocultural factors, on the one hand, and by biogenetic and neural moderating forces on the other. The chapters capture the vibrancy of current theory, research, and practice while pointing toward unexplored new directions. Students and seasoned pain researchers will find within the motivation-centered framework a host of intriguing ideas to complement extant formulations. And those engaged in treating/training persons with chronic pain will discover the unique, integrative value of motivational models.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Perez

This article develops a general critique of the economic approach to environmental regulation, drawing on the insights of systems theory. It highlights, first, the problematic of subjugating the regulatory system to a single purpose – which in the context of environmental economics is interpreted as the utilitarian maximization of collective welfare. Second, it questions the teleological pretence of the regulatory project as it is configured in the economic literature. It highlights in this context the problem of trans-systemic incompatibilities, which impede the incorporation of economic ideas into the systems of law and politics. Environmental economics in both its normative and sociopolitical strands, fails to provide a convincing response to this dilemma. The article discusses two examples of the reconstruction of economic ideas within the legal and political domains, drawing on the EU and US regulatory experience. This twofold critique of the economic approach can be extended, it is argued, to every regulatory project with far-reaching teleological ambitions. The article applies this critique to some alternative regulatory visions, such as self-regulation, reflexive law and responsive regulation, noting in this context the limitations of systems theory itself. It concludes with a discussion of the role of intuition in regulatory decision-making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn A. Saltzman ◽  
Barbara H. Fiese ◽  
Kelly K. Bost ◽  
Brent A. McBride

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document