Survey on the Shadow Economy and Undeclared Work in OECD Countries

Author(s):  
Lars P. Feld ◽  
Friedrich Schneider
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Schneider ◽  
Dominik H Enste

Using various methods, the size of the shadow economy in 76 developing, transition, and OECD countries is estimated. Average size varies from 12 percent of GDP for OECD countries, to 23 percent for transition countries and 39 percent for developing countries. Increasing taxation and social security contributions combined with rising state regulations are driving forces for the increase of the shadow economy, especially in OECD countries. According to some findings, corruption has a positive impact on the size of the shadow economy, and a growing shadow economy has a negative effect on official GDP growth.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Khanh Chu ◽  
Dung Phuong Hoang

Abstract This study explores the determinants of ecological footprint by integrating the influence of the shadow economy. The findings based on the panel quantile regression indicate that the environmental effects of the shadow economy, trade openness, energy intensity, renewable energy, and income are not homogeneous across various levels of ecological footprint. The shadow economy-ecological footprint nexus follows an inverted U-shaped pattern. Initially, the higher size of the informal economy leads to more ecosystem degradation. When the shadow economy increases to certain thresholds, its environmental impact reverts to benefit. Such threshold changes with the evolution of ecological footprint. Specifically, it first rises then decreases along with the degradation of the ecosystem. Moreover, the heterogeneous panel causality test reports the one-way directional running from the shadow economy to the ecological footprint in OECD countries. The significant and heterogeneous relationships between ecological footprint and its determining factors are also established.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars P. Feld ◽  
Friedrich Schneider

Abstract In most OECD countries the policy instrument of choice to prevent people from working in the shadows has been deterrence. While deterrence is well founded from a theoretical point of view, the empirical evidence on its success is weak: tax policies and state deregulation appear to work much better. The discussion of the recent literature underlines that in addition to economic opportunities, the overall situation in the labor market and unemployment are crucial for an understanding of the dynamics of the shadow economy.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Dell’Anno ◽  
Friedrich Schneider

Abstract Various methods to estimate the size of the shadow economy are discussed and the results of the shadow economy of 21 OECD countries are presented. Then the specific case of Italy is investigated and the aim of this section is to produce an estimate of the Italian shadow economy with the MIMIC (Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes) method. The procedure to obtain the underground economy as a share of official GDP is presented. The paper ends with some general conclusions about the reliability of the model approach and the efficacy of economic policies to reduce the shadow economy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 1627-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helmut Herwartz ◽  
Jordi Sardà ◽  
Bernd Theilen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document