scholarly journals Introducing theoretical perspectives on family business

Author(s):  
Mattias Nordqvist ◽  
Leif Melin ◽  
Matthias Waldkirch ◽  
Gershon Kumeto
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneleen Michiels ◽  
Vincent Molly

Motivated by the growing attention to the financing decisions of family firms, this review brings together the two highly relevant research fields of family business and finance. This study critically reviews 131 articles on financing decisions in family businesses, published between 1977 and 2016 in 64 finance and management journals. We develop a state of the art on family business financing literature and present a model to guide extant and future research by identifying gaps across the theoretical perspectives and across context-specific elements such as family business heterogeneity and country-specific factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. James ◽  
Jennifer E. Jennings ◽  
Rhonda S. Breitkreuz

This article demonstrates how the combined approaches of informed pluralism and disciplined integration can help rebridge the distance between the seemingly disparate academic worlds of family science and family business. The authors establish the need for such a resynthesis by documenting trends within family enterprise research from 1985 to 2010. The analysis vividly illustrates not only the increased dominance of publication outlets and theoretical perspectives associated with business but also the near disappearance of those associated with family. In light of these trends, the authors suggest that renewed attention to integrating ideas from the two disciplines is likely to enrich both. To illustrate this claim, this study combines concepts from long-standing theories within the family science literature (structural functionalism and symbolic interactionism) with those from predominant perspectives within the family business literature (agency theory and the resource-based view). The outcome is a series of provocative yet relevant potential new directions for each field.


Author(s):  
Eleni Stavrou

Family businesses seem to have unique characteristics that make them different from nonfamily firms and, even though this phenomenon is understudied, they seem to differ substantially from nonfamily firms in the ways they handle human resource management (HRM). This chapter focuses on three key theoretical perspectives, namely, the resource-based view of the firm, institutional perspectives, and stakeholder analyses, to advance understanding of HRM in family-owned organizations. First, looking at the direct relationships between strategic HRM and distal competitive outcomes, the family business context seems to fall short compared to the non–family business context. However, when adding moderators, some relationships change, raising questions as to the appropriateness of extant theorizations of competitive advantage across organizational institutional settings. Second, family businesses seem to pay special attention to certain stakeholders when compared to their nonfamily counterparts, creating the need to explicate the reasons behind such emphasis. Third, family businesses seem to be affected by certain institutional constraints and enablers, necessitating their study in greater depth and the reasons behind their effects. Given these results, this chapter proposes a line of research devoted to the study of HRM in family business in its institutional context, also looking at the antecedents and the effects of such practices.


2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
James J. Chrisman ◽  
Jess H. Chua ◽  
Pramodita Sharma

This article provides a review of important trends in the strategic management approach to studying family firms: convergence in definitions, accumulating evidence that family involvement may affect performance, and the emergence of agency theory and the resource–based view of the firm as the leading theoretical perspectives. We conclude by discussing directions for future research and other promising approaches to inform the inquiry concerning family business.


Author(s):  
Dustin L. Odom ◽  
Erick P. C. Chang ◽  
James J. Chrisman ◽  
Pramodita Sharma ◽  
Lloyd Steier

1999 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Stafford ◽  
Karen A. Duncan ◽  
Sharon Dane ◽  
Mary Winter

This paper proposes a research model that outlines the determinants of functional families and profitable businesses—requisites for family business sustainability. Two features distinguish the model from previous models: inclusion of the family in the same detail as the business and emphasis on the key features of family and business. Delineation of the interface between the family and the business permits the use of research methods that allow for variable degrees of overlap of family and business rather than assuming that family businesses constitute either a single system or two separate systems. The research model is also compatible with a variety of theoretical perspectives.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-221
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Mastnak

Abstract. Five overlapping eras or stages can be distinguished in the evolution of music therapy. The first one refers to the historical roots and ethnological sources that have influenced modern meta-theoretical perspectives and practices. The next stage marks the heterogeneous origins of modern music therapy in the 20th century that mirror psychological positions and novel clinical ideas about the healing power of music. The subsequent heyday of music therapeutic models and schools of thought yielded an enormous variety of concepts and methods such as Nordoff–Robbins music therapy, Orff music therapy, analytic music therapy, regulatory music therapy, guided imagery and music, sound work, etc. As music therapy gained in international importance, clinical applications required research on its therapeutic efficacy. According to standards of evidence-based medicine and with regard to clearly defined diagnoses, research on music therapeutic practice was the core of the fourth stage of evolution. The current stage is characterized by the emerging epistemological dissatisfaction with the paradigmatic reductionism of evidence-based medicine and by the strong will to discover the true healing nature of music. This trend has given birth to a wide spectrum of interdisciplinary hermeneutics for novel foundations of music therapy. Epigenetics, neuroplasticity, regulatory and chronobiological sciences, quantum physical philosophies, universal harmonies, spiritual and religious views, and the cultural anthropological phenomenon of esthetics and creativity have become guiding principles. This article should not be regarded as a historical treatise but rather as an attempt to identify theoretical landmarks in the evolution of modern music therapy and to elucidate the evolution of its spirit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document