COVID-19 in 2021: Sharing Responsibility Through Global Solidarity

Up to now, organizational buying is still interesting topic discussed. There are divergences among the findings in organizational buying researches. Different perspectives, fenomena observed, research domains and methods caused the divergences. This paper will discusse organizational buying behavior based on literature review, focused on behavior of decision making unit mainly on equipment buying. From this review literatures, it would be theoritical foundation that is valid and reliable to develop propositions in organizational buying behavior. Based on review literature refferences, variables are classified into: purchase situation, member of decision making unit perception, conflict among the members, information search, influences among members of decision making unit. Integrated approach is used to develop propositions relating to: purchasing complexity, sharing responsibility among the members, conflict in decision making unit, information search, time pressure as moderating variable between sharing responsibility and conflict in decision making unit, the influence among the members inside decision making unit and decision making outcome

Download Full-text

Renovating the View of Cost Sharing for the Underground Low Voltage Cable Projects in Hanoi

VNU Journal of Science Economics and Business ◽

10.25073/2588-1108/vnueab.4295 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (5E) ◽

Author(s):

Pham Thi Thu Ha ◽

Phan Dieu Huong

Keyword(s):

Willingness To Pay ◽

Cost Sharing ◽

Low Voltage ◽

Power Grid ◽

Field Studies ◽

Power Industry ◽

Well Field ◽

The Subject ◽

Sharing Responsibility ◽

The Cost

Underground power grid projects in Hanoi is so urgent that it requires immediate implementation. To synchronously and quickly implement the underground power grid projects, people in charge should not follow the outdated perspectives of just including the power industry, but also need to call for the support and cost sharing responsibility from consumers. This paper aims at approaching the subject both from the producers and consumers’ perspectives to together sharing the cost of putting the power grid underground not only in Hanoi but other metropolitans in Vietnam as well. Field studies (including 104 families) at Hoan Kiem District, Hanoi and CBA method were applied to investigate the willingness to pay (WTP) level of consumers to share the cost with the power industry for the underground power grid projects in Hanoi. The overview of the results shows that cost for the underground power grid in Hoan Kiem District ranging from 30,000 VND/household/month to 46,000VND/household/month. On the other hand, the willingness to pay of a typical household of four people within Hoan Kiem District ranges from 17,000VND/month to 24,000VND/month, with the most favorable method of annual payment within a detailed timeline.

Download Full-text

Exporting Revolution: Cuba's Global Solidarity by Margaret RandallMargaret Randall, Exporting Revolution: Cuba's Global Solidarity. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2017. x, 270 pp. $99.95 US (cloth), $25.95 US (paper or e-book).

Canadian Journal of History ◽

10.3138/cjh.ach.53.2.rev43 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 53 (2) ◽

pp. 345-347

Author(s):

Gary Prevost

Keyword(s):

Duke University ◽

Global Solidarity

Download Full-text

Bilateral Migration Agreements and the GATS: Sharing Responsibility versus Reciprocity

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.1156842 ◽

2008 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Marion Panizzon

Keyword(s):

Sharing Responsibility

Download Full-text

Reparation for Environmental Damage in Jus Post Bellum

10.1093/oso/9780198784630.003.0012 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Ilias Plakokefalos

Keyword(s):

Armed Conflict ◽

Environmental Law ◽

Shared Responsibility ◽

Armed Conflicts ◽

Environmental Harm ◽

Environmental Damage ◽

Jus Post Bellum ◽

Typical Situation ◽

Sharing Responsibility

This chapter explores the problems that environmental damage in armed conflict pose to the determination of shared responsibility, and especially the determination of reparations, in the context of the jus post bellum. When two actors are engaged in armed conflict, there arise no serious issues as to sharing responsibility for violations. But the fact that modern armed conflicts often involve more than two actors (e.g. Libya 2011) complicates the matters arising out of environmental harm, as there may be two or more actors contributing to the same harmful event. This is a typical situation of shared responsibility. Shared responsibility provides that the problem of reparations for environmental harm is to be examined in situations where there is a multiplicity of actors that contribute to a single harmful outcome. This definition covers the breach of obligations under jus ad bellum and jus in bello, as well as under international environmental law.

Download Full-text