scholarly journals THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF GLOBAL RISK ANALYSIS IN SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SPHERES

2021 ◽  
pp. 284-395
Author(s):  
Vladimir Granaturov ◽  
◽  
Petro Vorobiyenko ◽  
Iryna Korablinova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Methodological Problems

Improving safety of preparation and administration of medicines and enteral nutrition in a neonatal care unit: Global risk analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-166
Author(s):  
K. Zribi ◽  
C.L. Seydoux ◽  
Y. Coatantiec ◽  
V. Chenet ◽  
F. Karnycheff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Neonatal Care ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Neonatal Care Unit

PD-0407: Improving safety in radiotherapy: The implementation of the Global Risk Analysis method

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S160-S161
Author(s):  
R. Mazeron ◽  
N. Aguini ◽  
E. Rivin del Campo ◽  
A. Baudré ◽  
I. Dumas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Global Risk

scholarly journals The Global Risk Analysis as a tool to secure drug management of clinical trials in hospitals

2018 ◽  
Vol WCP2018 (0) ◽  
pp. PO3-12-16
Author(s):  
Jacques A Weissenburger ◽  
Juliette Godard ◽  
Caroline Ly ◽  
Anne Daguenel ◽  
Christine Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Drug Management

scholarly journals Uncertainty Analysis in Project Appraisal*

1976 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
M. Meenakshi Malya
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
World Bank ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
Investment Projects ◽  
Project Appraisal ◽  
The World Bank ◽  
The World ◽  
Methodological Problems

One of the inherent characteristics of capital investment projects is the presence of uncertainties in estimated outlays and future benefits. The concept of sensitivity analysis in project appraisal has been recently extended to include risk analysis. The assessment of the nature and magnitude of uncertainties poses methodological problems. The complexities arising out of interdependencies among the uncertainties necessitate a formal approach to risk analysis. A methodology for assessing the uncertainties, especially when they are interdependent, is outlined here. The application of the methodology is illustrated in the context of a project financed by the World Bank.

National and Global Risk Studies: How Can the Field of Risk Analysis Contribute?

Risk Analysis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terje Aven ◽  
Louis Anthony Cox
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Global Risk

Coordinated efforts in tsunami hazard and risk analyses in Europe and link to the Global Tsunami Model network initiative

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finn Løvholt ◽  
Jörn Behrens ◽  
Stefano Lorito ◽  
Andrey Babeyko
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Tsunami Hazard ◽  
Seismic Sources ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Model Network ◽  
Tsunami Risk ◽  
Hazard And Risk ◽  
Tsunami Model ◽  
Hazard And Risk Analysis

<p>The tsunami disasters of 2004 in the Indian Ocean and of 2011 along the Tohoku coast of Japan revealed severe gaps between the anticipated risk and consequences, with resulting loss of life and property. A similar observation is also relevant for the smaller, yet disastrous, tsunamis with unusual source characteristics such as the recent events in Palu Bay and Sunda Strait in 2018. The severe consequences were underestimated in part due to the lack of rigorous and accepted hazard analysis methods and large uncertainty in forecasting the tsunami sources. Population response to small recent tsunamis in the Mediterranean also revealed a lack of preparedness and awareness. While there is no absolute protection against large tsunamis, a more accurate analysis of the potential risk can help to minimize losses. The tsunami community has made significant progress in understanding tsunami hazard from seismic sources. However, this is only part of the inputs needed to effectively manage tsunami risk, which should be understood more holistically, including non-seismic sources, vulnerability in different dimensions and the overall societal effects, in addition to its interaction with other hazards and cascading effects. Moreover, higher standards need to be achieved to manage and quantify uncertainty, which govern our basis for tsunami risk decision making. Hence, a collective community effort is needed to effectively handle all these challenges across disciplines and trades, from researchers to stakeholders. To coordinate and streamline these activities and make progress towards implementing the Sendai Framework of Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) the Global Tsunami Model network (GTM) was initiated in 2015 towards enhancing our understanding of tsunami hazard and risk from a local to global scale. Here, we focus on coordinated European efforts, sharing the same goals as GTM, towards improving standards and best practices for tsunami risk reduction. The networking initiative, AGITHAR (Accelerating Global science In Tsunami HAzard and Risk Analysis), is a European COST Action, aims to assess, benchmark, improve, and document methods to analyse tsunami hazard and risk, understand and communicate the uncertainty involved, and interact with stakeholders in order to understand the societal needs and thus contribute to their effort to minimize losses. In this presentation, we provide an overview of the suite of methodologies used for tsunami hazard and risk analysis, review state of the art in global tsunami hazard and risk analysis, dating back to results from the Global Risk Model in 2015, and highlight possible gaps and challenges. We further discuss how AGITHAR and GTM will address how to tackle these challenges, and finally, discuss how global and regional structures such as the European Plate Observing System (EPOS) and the UNDRR Global Risk Assessment Framework (GRAF) can facilitate and mutually benefit towards an integrated framework of services aiding improved understanding of multiple hazards.</p>

Implementation of the global risk analysis in pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy: Methods and results

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mazeron ◽  
N. Aguini ◽  
E. Rivin del Campo ◽  
I. Dumas ◽  
M.-C. Gensse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Pulsed Dose Rate

Improving safety in radiotherapy: The implementation of the Global Risk Analysis method

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renaud Mazeron ◽  
Nadia Aguini ◽  
Eleonor Rivin ◽  
Anne Baudré ◽  
Marie-Stéphanie Bour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Global Risk

scholarly journals Occupational risks evaluation in a centralized antineoplastic agent preparation unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211986697
Author(s):  
Quentin Dubray ◽  
Taibou Diallo ◽  
Richard Loeuillet ◽  
Emilie Andre ◽  
Anne-Sophie Fauqueur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Antineoplastic Agent ◽  
Psychosocial Risk ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Medical Monitoring ◽  
Global Risk ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Occupational Risks ◽  
Corrective Actions

Objective: The global professional risk assessment applied to the central unit of antineoplastic agent preparations is part of a mandatory approach required by the European legislation for workers. This study identified the hazardous situations related to the staff activity and then enabled the preparation of a formal plan of occupational prevention. Methods: The nature of study approved by a working group constituted by experts was the global risk analysis. After identifying the hazardous situations, the global risk analysis estimated the risk level of each hazardous situation based on a criticality score, including severity and frequency. The global risk analysis highlighted the initial and residual risks after establishing a plan to reduce the high criticality risks. Results: Hence, 33 unacceptable hazardous situations were identified. The critical categories of professional risks were “Product, emissions, and waste risks” with 17 (55%) hazardous situations; “Psychosocial risk factors” with 8 (24%) hazardous situations; and “Risks related to work equipment” with 6 (18%) hazardous situations. Once the risk reduction plan was in place, all hazardous situations were considered under control. The corrective actions led to a reorganization of human resources, the update of protection protocols, and optimization of ergonomic work tools. Staff-specific medical monitoring and regular surface contamination tests have been scheduled annually. In addition, initial and continuous training, specific to product and waste risks, has been updated. Conclusion: The global professional risk assessment related to centralized antineoplastic agent preparation unit generated failure in our system and enabled corrective actions for staff safety.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document