pulsed dose rate
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

203
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (21) ◽  
pp. 5315
Author(s):  
Konstantinos P. Chatzipapas ◽  
Dimitris Plachouris ◽  
Panagiotis Papadimitroulas ◽  
Konstantinos A. Mountris ◽  
Julien Bert ◽  
...  

This study aims to validate GATE and GGEMS simulation toolkits for brachytherapy applications and to provide accurate models for six commercial brachytherapy seeds, which will be freely available for research purposes. The AAPM TG-43 guidelines were used for the validation of two Low Dose Rate (LDR), three High Dose Rate (HDR), and one Pulsed Dose Rate (PDR) brachytherapy seeds. Each seed was represented as a 3D model and then simulated in GATE to produce one single Phase-Space (PHSP) per seed. To test the validity of the simulations’ outcome, referenced data (provided by the TG-43) was compared with GATE results. Next, validation of the GGEMS toolkit was achieved by comparing its outcome with the GATE MC simulations, incorporating clinical data. The simulation outcomes on the radial dose function (RDF), anisotropy function (AF), and dose rate constant (DRC) for the six commercial seeds were compared with TG-43 values. The statistical uncertainty was limited to 1% for RDF, to 6% (maximum) for AF, and to 2.7% (maximum) for the DRC. GGEMS provided a good agreement with GATE when compared in different situations: a) Homogeneous water sphere, b) heterogeneous CT phantom, and c) a realistic clinical case. In addition, GGEMS has the advantage of very fast simulations. For the clinical case, where TG-186 guidelines were considered, GATE required 1 h for the simulation while GGEMS needed 162 s to reach the same statistical uncertainty. This study produced accurate models and simulations of their emitted spectrum of commonly used commercial brachytherapy seeds which are freely available to the scientific community. Furthermore, GGEMS was validated as an MC GPU based tool for brachytherapy. More research is deemed necessary for the expansion of brachytherapy seed modeling.


2021 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. S173-S175
Author(s):  
G. Menon ◽  
B. Long ◽  
R. Petit ◽  
J. Zimmer ◽  
K. Gadbois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1387
Author(s):  
Radouane El Ayachy ◽  
Roger Sun ◽  
Kanta Ka ◽  
Adrien Laville ◽  
Anne-Sophie Duhamel ◽  
...  

Purpose: Lip carcinoma represents one of the most common types of head and neck cancer. Brachytherapy is a highly effective therapeutic option for all stages of lip cancers. We report our experience of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR) as treatment of lip carcinoma. Methods and Materials: this retrospective single center study included all consecutive patients treated for a lip PDR brachytherapy in our institution from 2010 to 2019. The toxicities and outcomes of the patients were reported, and a retrospective quality of life assessment was conducted by phone interviews (FACT H&N). Results: From October 2010 to December 2019, 38 patients were treated in our institution for a lip carcinoma by PDR brachytherapy. The median age was 73, and the majority of patients presented T1-T2 tumors (79%). The median total dose was 70.14 Gy (range: 60–85 Gy). With a mean follow-up of 35.4 months, two patients (5.6%) presented local failure, and seven patients (19%) had lymph node progression. The Kaplan–Meier estimated probability of local failure was 7.2% (95% CI: 0.84–1) at two and four years. All patients encountered radiomucitis grade II or higher. The rate of late toxicities was low: three patients (8.3%) had grade II fibrosis, and one patient had grade II chronic pain. All patients would highly recommend the treatment. The median FACT H&N total score was 127 out of 148, and the median FACT H&N Trial Outcome Index was 84. Conclusions: This study confirms that an excellent local control rate is achieved with PDR brachytherapy as treatment of lip carcinoma, with very limited late side effects and satisfactory functional outcomes. A multimodal approach should help to improve regional control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 253 ◽  
pp. 09001
Author(s):  
Krystsina Makarevich ◽  
Roland Beyer ◽  
Jürgen Henniger ◽  
Yuzhen Ma ◽  
Sarah Polter ◽  
...  

This paper presents the concept of an active dosimetry system and its operational regime for pulsed radiation dose rate measurements. The plastic scintillator is suggested to be used for absorbed dose rate measurements. As long as the detector can be considered tissue equivalent, the energy weighting of pile-up events in terms of the dose is achieved. The real-time distinction of pulsed and non-pulsed dose rate contributions is based on the time structure of a single interaction and requires only basic information about the beam time structure (pulses duration and period). The detector connected to a fully digital signal processing board creates an active dosimetry system with adjustable parameters. Such a system was used for absorbed dose rate measurements in pulsed photon field mimicking radiation field outside the bunker of a medical LINAC, but also in the presence of a constant radiation component. The results show a linear dependence of a pulsed radiation contribution on the accelerator current in the investigated range of the total dose rate up to 8 μGy/h.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Berenguer Frances ◽  
Isabel Linares-Galiana ◽  
Rut Cañas Cortés ◽  
Susanna Marín i Borrás ◽  
Cristina Gutiérrez Miguélez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S68-S69
Author(s):  
T. Brahmi ◽  
A.A. Serre ◽  
F. Gassa ◽  
F. Lafay ◽  
M. Sandt ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S228
Author(s):  
T. Brahmi ◽  
A.A. Serre ◽  
F. Gassa ◽  
M. Sandt ◽  
F. Lafay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document