COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INVESTIGATION IMPOSED BY SEBI ON PRICE RIGGING AND INSIDER TRADING

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Christopher Raj
Author(s):  
Çetin Arslan ◽  
Didar Özdemir

Insider trading act is penalised ultima ratio with the aim of fighting against manmade market actions which outrage the principle of public disclosure and the element of trust in order to establish equality and good faith in capital markets. Insider trading is first disposed as a crime among the other capital market crimes (art.47/1-A-1) in the Capital Market Code no.2499 dated 28.07.1981 with the Amendment to the law no.3794 dated 29.04.1992 and at the present time it is rearranged as a self-contained crime type in article 106 of the Capital Market Code no.6362 dated 06.12.2012. In this study, the crime of insider trading is examined –in particular through the controversial points- as a comparative analysis between abrogated and current dispositions in Turkish Law.


Obiter ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Chitimira

This paper analyses the regulation of market abuse under the Financial Markets Act 19 of 2012 in order to investigate the adequacy of such regulation as regards to the combating of market-abuse practices in South Africa. To this end, the paper provides an overview analysis of the market abuse (insider trading and market manipulation) offences as well as the penalties and other anti-market abuse-enforcement approaches that are employed under the Financial Markets Act 19 of 2012 in a bid to provide a revamped and adequate anti-market abuse regulatory and -enforcement framework in South Africa. Moreover, where possible, the paper also provides a comparative analysis of these offences, penalties and other anti-market abuse-enforcement approaches and those that were provided under the Securities Services Act 36 of 2004. This is done to examine whether the anti-market abuse regulatory and -enforcement framework that was re-introduced under the Financial Markets Act 19 of 2012 has now adequately resolved the flaws and gaps that were associated with a similar framework under the former Act.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander De Castro ◽  
Anna Blachnio-Parzych

Nosso objetivo aqui é comparar a proteção contra insider trading no Brasil e na União Europeia, especificamente a maneira como o insider trading é sancionado nessas duas jurisdições. Destacaremos as diferentes combinações entre sanções administrativas e criminais encontradas nos dois sistemas e suas implicações para os direitos fundamentais e da personalidade (no caso do Brasil) dos responsáveis pela prática de abuso de informação privilegiada. A possível acumulação de punições impostas por tribunais criminais e órgãos reguladores administrativos levanta a questão de saber se pode haver uma violação do princípio ne bis in idem. A resposta a essa pergunta será diferente em cada sistema. Começaremos fazendo um breve balanço da gênese e da evolução da regulamentação sobre uso de informações privilegiadas no Brasil e na UE, a fim de compreender as diferentes razões para a proibição do insider trading nas duas jurisdições de forma a entender os motivos por trás de suas divergências e convergências.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 398-398
Author(s):  
Luis H. Braga ◽  
Joao L. Pippi Salle ◽  
Sumit Dave ◽  
Sean Skeldon ◽  
Armando J. Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document