scholarly journals Secondary Germline CDKN2A Mutation Identified using Liquid Biopsy in a Patient with Esophageal Cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67
Author(s):  
Hanmil Jang ◽  
Dongju Won ◽  
Saeam Shin ◽  
Seong Yong Park ◽  
Dae Joon Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 3566-3574 ◽  
Author(s):  
An Zhao ◽  
Liwei Guo ◽  
Ji Xu ◽  
Lei Zheng ◽  
Zhenying Guo ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 3070
Author(s):  
Daisuke Matsushita ◽  
Takaaki Arigami ◽  
Keishi Okubo ◽  
Ken Sasaki ◽  
Masahiro Noda ◽  
...  

Esophageal cancer is among the most aggressive diseases, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been recognized as novel biomarkers for various cancers over the past two decades, including esophageal cancer. CTCs might provide crucial clinical information for predicting cancer prognosis, monitoring therapeutic responses or recurrences, or elucidating the mechanism of metastasis. The isolation of CTCs is among the applications of a “liquid biopsy”. There are various technologies for liquid biopsies, and they are classified into two main methods: cytometric or non-cytometric techniques. Here, we review a total of 57 eligible articles to summarize various technologies for the use of a liquid biopsy in esophageal cancer and perform a meta-analysis to assess the clinical utility of liquid biopsies as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker technique. For prognostic evaluation, the pooled hazard ratio in the cytometric assay is relatively higher than that of the non-cytometric assay. On the other hand, a combination of multiple molecules, using a non-cytometric assay, might be a favorable biomarker technique for the early diagnosis of esophageal cancer. Although determining strong evidence for a biomarker by using a liquid biopsy is still challenging, our meta-analysis might be a milestone for the future development of liquid biopsies in use with esophageal cancer.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna VanLiere Canzoniero ◽  
Vincent Lam ◽  
Zineb Belcaid ◽  
Mara Lanis ◽  
Lamia Rhymee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Jonathan Spoor ◽  
Ben M. Eyck ◽  
Peggy N. Atmodimedjo ◽  
Maurice P. H. M. Jansen ◽  
Jean C. A. Helmijr ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuyang Yuan ◽  
Xinfeng Wang ◽  
Xiao Geng ◽  
Yin Li ◽  
Juwei Mu ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Evangelista ◽  
James L. Coyle

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Esophageal resection is the mainstay treatment for cancers of the esophagus. While curative, surgical resection may result in swallowing difficulties that require intervention from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Minimally invasive surgical procedures for esophageal resection have aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with more invasive techniques. Both intra-operative and post-operative complications, regardless of the surgical approach, can result in dysphagia. This article will review the epidemiological impact of esophageal cancers, operative complications resulting in dysphagia, and clinical assessment and management of dysphagia pertinent to esophageal resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document