scholarly journals Innovation, Evolution and History of Technology in Industry

Athenea ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Héctor Tillerias ◽  
Juan Segura ◽  
Gabriela Álvarez

This paper presents a description of the history of the technology used in the industries, its evolution regarding the use of energy and the processes that have innovated it within the industries. It describes the technology that highlighted industrial revolutions from the first to the present, and presents estimates of future trends. The evolution presents changes regarding energy consumption and efficiencies in the use of technologies in the industry. The innovation presents the changes or techniques implemented to obtain greater benefit from the technology and respond in a better way to the market demand. Clear trends are identified in the increased use of technology in industries with respect to their labor and energy consumption. Keywords: Technologies, industrial revolutions, innovation. References [1]G. M. GROSSMAN, «Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy,» Cambridge, 1991. [2]S. NAVA, «New Paradigm of Big Data in Industry 4.0 era,» TOG ( A Coruña), 2018. [3]L. Kim, La dinámica del aprendizaje tecnológico en la industrialización, Suam Foundation, 2000. [4]H. Pack, E.Westphal, Industrial Strategy and Technological Change, Journal of Development Economies, vol. 4, pp. 205-237, 1986. [5]A. ESCARDINO, «La innovación tecnológica en la industria cerámica de Castellón,» Boletin de sociedad Española Ceramica y vidrio, vol. 40, 2001. [6]M ASHTON, T.S. «The lnduetrtal Revolutlon, 1760-1830. Oxford University Press, 1948». La Revolución Industrial. F.C.E., México, 1950. [7]E. WRIGLEY, The Supply of Raw Materials in the Industrial Revolution, Economic History Review, 1962. [8]R. CANTOR, La tercera revolución industrial. Universitas Humanística, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/univhumanistica/article/view/9908. [Last access: January 23, 2020]. [9]K. SCHWAB, Cuarta Revolución Industrial. Madrid: Debate, 2016. [10]C. MACHICADO, Las revoluciones industriales. INESAD: Desarrollo sobre la Mesa, 2018, [Online]. Available: [http://inesad.edu.bo/dslm/2018/08/las-revoluciones-industriales/[Last access: January 23, 2020].

Author(s):  
Владимир Щипцов

The Fennoscandian Shield is a megastructure, which has actively evolved since the early stages of earth crust formation (> 3.5 Ga) and a sequence of geological regimes during subsequent geological evolution paralleled by the formation of various types of industrial mineral deposits. The paper shows the important role of the shield’s industrial minerals in the exploitation of global useful mineral deposits played for decades. The industrial mineral potential and its dependence on socio-economic conditions, environmental requirements and market demand are described.


2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Clark

The British Industrial Revolution is the key break in world history. Yet the timing, location, and cause of this Revolution are unsolved puzzles. Joel Mokyr's book is one of a number of recent attempted solutions. He explains the Industrial Revolution through the arrival of a particular ideology in Britain, associated with the earlier European intellectual movement of the Enlightenment. This review considers how Mokyr's “idealist” approach fares as an account of the Industrial Revolution, compared to the spate of recent proposed “materialist” explanations. (JEL N13, N63)


Author(s):  
Arlindo Oliveira

This chapter provides a brief review of the history of technology, covering pre-historical technologies, the agricultural revolution, the first two industrial revolutions, and the third industrial revolution, based on information technology. Evidence is provided that technological development tends to follow an exponential curve, leading to technologies that typically were unpredictable just a few years before. An analysis of a number of exponential trends and behaviors is provided, in order to acquaint the reader with the sometimes surprising properties of exponential growth. In general, exponential functions tend to grow slower than expected in the short term, and faster than expected in the long term. It is this property that make technology evolution very hard to predict.


Naukratis ◽  
2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Moller

In accordance with the hermeneutical principles laid down in the introduction, this chapter will be devoted to an account of the theoretical models underlying the analysis and interpretation of the source material. Karl Polanyi’s empirical observations resulted in a series of ideal-types such as can be employed for the evaluation of the evidence from Naukratis in the following chapters. Polanyi’s works do not form one single, complete theory of economy; rather, they should be seen—as Sally Humphreys has put it so aptly—as sketches of areas within largely unexplored territory. It is of course true that George Dalton went to great lengths to develop Polanyi’s ideas further; the fact nevertheless remains that they continue to be far from accepted as paradigms for all further research in the field of economic anthropology or economic history. Indeed, such continuations of Polanyi’s approach have served only to limit unduly the openness that is the very advantage of his ideal-types. It is for this reason that one should return to Polanyi himself and employ his original ideas. His work has been taken up by only a few within the realm of the economic history of classical antiquity, something due partly to his own—problematic—statements on the subject of Greek history, and partly to lack of interest shown for anthropological approaches within ancient history. Polanyi disagreed with the view that markets were the ubiquitous form of economic organization—an attitude regarding the notion of the market as essential to the description of every economy—and also with the belief that it is the economic organization of any given society which determines its social, political, and cultural structures. For his part, Polanyi contended that an economy organized around the market first came into being with the Industrial Revolution, and that it was not until then that the two root meanings of the word ‘economic’—on the one hand, in the sense of provision with goods; on the other, in the sense of a thrifty use of resources, as in the words ‘economical’ and ‘economizing’—merged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document