Impact of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) on firm performance: The case of Malaysian listed firms

2013 ◽  
pp. 249-259
Author(s):  
Noraznira Abd Razak ◽  
◽  
Zuriah Abdul Rahman ◽  
Halimahton Borhan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Enterprise Risk

scholarly journals Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Mazurina Mohd Ali ◽  
Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid ◽  
Erlane K Ghani
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Audit Firm ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Significant Coefficient ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship

This study aims to examine the relationship between enterprise risk management (ERM) implementation and firm performance in Malaysia. Using the sample from 2010 to 2016, this study examines the relationship between ERM and firm performance among Malaysian top 100 public listed firms registered on the Index FTSE Bursa Malaysia 100 (FBM100) KLSE. This study also provides comparisons before and after the introduction of Bursa Malaysia Guidelines 2013. This study shows a positive and significant coefficient between profitability and firm performance towards ERM implementation. However, this study shows insignificant relationship between firm size, financial leverage and audit firm with firm performance. This study also shows that there is an increase in the mean score and standard deviation of these variables after the implementation of Bursa Malaysia Guideline 2013. The findings in this study provides an understanding to the Malaysian public listed firms on the importance of ERM and subsequently, maximise the benefits of ERM especially after the introduction of Bursa Malaysia Guidelines 2013 for the benefits of their stakeholders and regulatory improvement in future.

scholarly journals The Benefit of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) On Firm Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 168
Author(s):  
Mochamad Muslih
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Control Variable ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Independent Variable

<p>There were inconsistencies on the results of some ERM researches formerly.  There were some variabilities on the benefits and obstacles hampering the implementation of ERM.  The purpose of this research is to study the benefits of  Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to increase firm performance.</p><p>This research used quantitative method, using the statistical software  of eviews 9 to process the data samples.  The Sampled firms arecompanies listed in the Indonesian stock exchange. 108 questionnaires were filled by the respondents. The variables measured are firm performances and enterprise risk management. The implementation of corporate governance and firm performance are also measured as control variables. Regression procedures were used to analyze the data samples. Some secondary data were also used to enrich analizing the research phenomena.</p><p>The research findings showed a significant relationship between ERM with firm performance. The effect of ERM as independent variable on firm performance waso significant so that the influence of corporate governance (CG) as  control variable became insignificant. Actually based on individual regression, CG influence on firm performance is significant. But totally the influence became insignificant, hampered by the magnitude of ERM influence significancy. These findings add to positive heuristics of falsification model of research as proposed by Imre Lakatos.</p>

scholarly journals Does Audit Committee Characteristics Promote Risk Management Practices in Nigerian Listed Firms?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Ojeka ◽  
Alex Adeboye ◽  
Olajide Dahunsi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Financial Risk ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Audit Committees ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Accounting Expertise

There has been a huge and deluge of risk threatening industries at an unequalled magnitude in recent times. As such, the board of directors and senior executives are increasingly expected to manage their various organizations' risk portfolios, affecting their financial performance. This has led to the assigning of the risk assessment role to the audit committee. The board of directors and its audit committee play an essential function in Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) by building up the right condition or tone-at-the-top. Given the board's responsibilities for representing the interests of shareholders, it plays a vital role in overseeing management's approach to ERM. This study examined the relationship between audit committee characteristics and risk management of some selected listed firms in a developing country like Nigeria. The study used secondary data to describe the dependent variable (financial risk decomposed into credit risk and liquidity risk) and the explanatory variables (decomposed into audit committee accounting expertise, audit committee meetings, audit committee independence and audit committee gender). The study used pair sample t-test, student t-test, Pearson Moment Correlation and random panel data estimator for twenty (20) selected listed firms for 2012-2016. Findings indicate that there is a negative between audit committee accounting expertise and financial risk. This revealed that Accounting Expertise in Audit Committees are likely to involve in activities and practices to curb financial risk. In addition, the Audit committee meeting indicates a negative relationship with credit risk. Audit committee gender and audit committee independence have a negative effect on liquidity risk. Therefore, this study recommends that Audit committees embrace Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) to manage risks effectively across the organization. Risk management processes should be one of the major points of discussion during audit committee meetings.

Retail 4.0 adoption and firm performance among Malaysian retailers: the role of enterprise risk management as moderator

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Poorni Sakrabani ◽  
Ai Ping Teoh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Impact Of Technology ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to ascertain the determinants of firm performance for Malaysian retailers.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted to collect responses from members of the Malaysian Retailers' Chain Association. A total of 126 responses were obtained. Data analysis was done by using the PLS-SEM method.FindingsThe results of the study indicate that Retail 4.0 adoption is able to improve retailers' performance as-a-whole by improving the four perspectives of firm performance as given in the Balanced Scorecard, i.e. the finance perspective, the customer perspective, the internal processes' perspective and also learning and growth perspective. Further, enterprise risk management was found to have a positive moderating effect on retailers' performance as-a-whole and also on the finance and customer perspectives of performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was conducted only in Malaysia and so, it might be geographically limited. Besides, it is cross-sectional in nature and therefore, the impact might be different if the study had been conducted over a longer period.Practical implicationsThis study provides a useful framework for retailers who are seeking to improve firm performance.Originality/valueThis is one of the first studies to show the impact of Retail 4.0 adoption on firm performance. Besides, this is also the first time, enterprise risk management has been introduced as a positive moderator on the impact of technology adoption on retailers' performance.

Modeling firm resources –enterprise risk management relationships

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noraznira Abd Razak ◽  
Zuriah Ab Rahman ◽  
Halimahton Borhan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Firm Resources ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Depth Analysis

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus, explore, and provide an in-depth analysis of the relationship between company resources and the process of enterprise risk management (ERM) in order to strengthen corporate structures against emerging uncertainties. Design/methodology/approach – This paper proposes a strategic risk management framework for the development and sustainability of corporate performance by focussing on the dimension of firm resources extracted from the resources-based theory. This paper focussed on using Malaysia listed firms under Malaysian Bourse as sample frame using the random sampling technique whereby questionnaire were distributed among head of risk management department. Of the 600 questionnaires distributed, 223 were returned completed. Findings – The survey results indicate that intangible resources play a significant roles in resources – performance relationship while the other two main dimension that are tangible resources and capabilities have shown contradictory results. Research limitations/implications – This paper only focussed on using Malaysia listed firms under Malaysian Bourse as sample frame. Practical implications – The management of risk is a dynamic phenomenon and the change of management that parallel with its evolution demand a revisiting and revamping over and over again promptly. In order to adapt and survive the volatile environment time and again, the effort to ensure long-term sustainability has to be made by the firm as success and failure can quickly replace one another in a relatively short period. The results highlight the various insight that might be helpful to managers in terms of managing the performance of the firm by concentrating entirely on its risk management and resources managements process. Originality/value – Overall it was shown that only certain dimension of resources within the firm has strong relationship with the performance variation. As such, the company has to ensure that deployment of resources has to be optimized accordingly by focussing on the types of resources that matters so that possibility of improving the outcome of the firm in the volatile global environment can be realized.

scholarly journals ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IN MALAYSIAN PUBLIC LISTED FIRMS

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid ◽  
Nargess Golshan ◽  
Mozhdeh Mokhber ◽  
Gi-Gi Tan ◽  
Nor Aiza Mohd-Zamil
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Organizational Performance ◽  
Measurement System ◽  
Enterprise Risk Management ◽  
Performance Measurement System ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Measurement Systems ◽  
Enterprise Risk ◽  
Performance Measurement Systems

There has been a call for integrating a strategic performance measurement system and enterprise risk management (ERM) as a proposed best practice for risk management. This study examines the effects of ERM and performance measurement systems (PMS) on organizational performance. In addition, this study also examines the effects of a linked ERM-PMS tool on organizational performance. The research method involved administering an online questionnaire survey to 196 public listed firms. The respondents were the head of risk management department of the firms. In the case of ERM and PMS effects on organizational performance, the result of simple linear regression supported the research hypotheses. However the results from the moderated multiple regression which was employed to test the joint effect of ERM and PMS on organizational performance did not support the research hypothesis. Based on the study results it is recommended that firms may practice ERM and PMS separately rather than linking them together, since their integration may complicate the PMS framework. Keywords: Enterprise Risk Management; Performance Measurement System; Balanced Scorecard; Organizational Performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document