scholarly journals Development of Japanese treatment evaluation inventory for mental disease

Author(s):  
Ayano Oishi ◽  
Mika Omori
1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew A. McDonnell ◽  
Peter Sturmey ◽  
Bob Dearden

Three methods of physical restraint were videotaped and presented to two groups of subjects (undergraduate students and teenagers). Two of the methods recommended restraining a person with a learning difficulty on the ground; the other method proposed seating the individual in a chair. Subjects were asked to rate the social acceptability of the procedures using the Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI). Both undergraduate students and teenagers rated the chair method as more acceptable. The implications of these findings for the use of physical restraint procedures were discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 475-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Newton ◽  
P. Sturmey

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory of Kazdin, French, and Sherick is a 19-item measure of the perceived acceptability of behavioural treatments. Development of two brief forms was based on data from two sources. For Study 1, data from 218 completed questionnaires were used to develop internally consistent brief scales. In Study 2 internal consistency and the validity of the brief forms were estimated for a set of 131 questionnaires. Item reduction was achieved by analysis of item-total minus item correlations. Brief forms with 3, 6, 9, and 12 items were proposed. Their internal consistency (Cronbach α) and construct validity were based on correlations of scores on each short form with the full scale scores and on comparing means of different forms. Discriminant validity was based on the difference between two groups (estimated effect size 0.7). Scores for all forms showed high internal consistency and correlated highly with total scale scores. Only the 12-item brief scale yielded mean scores similar to the full scale. The 3-item form could be used as a quick screen, and the 12-item form for more intensive purposes as it is most similar to the full-scale.


1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary L. Kelley ◽  
Robert W. Heffer ◽  
Frank M. Gresham ◽  
Stephen N. Elliott

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Paquet ◽  
Suzie McKinnon ◽  
Celine Clément ◽  
Michel Rousseau

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. T. Newton ◽  
R. Nabeyama ◽  
P. Sturmey

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI) is a commonly used 19-item measure of treatment acceptability. It yields a total score and Patient Progress and Acceptability subscales. The internal consistency and factor structure of the TEI were assessed in two samples, 218 members of the general public and 131 dental students. The total and both subscales had very high internal consistency (alpha for total scale =.96 and .94 in the two samples; alphas for Patient Progress .95 and .92; alphas for Acceptability .90 and .86). Factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution that accounted for 64.4% and 54.0% of the variance, but which did not correspond to the two existing subscales. A second analysis examined the distribution of TEI scores and correlations with two other measures of treatment acceptability (a thermometer rating scale and a 5-point Likert-type scale) in a sample of 222 undergraduate students. All measures were negatively skewed. There were large, significant correlations between the full scale TEI and the other measures, so the full TEI has concurrent validity. However, the TEI did not meet Anastasi's (1976) criterion for independent and useful subscales, therefore only the full scale score should be used.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer D. Tiano ◽  
Rebecca M. Grate ◽  
Cheryl B. McNeil

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Syzdek ◽  
Jonathan D. Green ◽  
Bruce R. Lindgren ◽  
Michael E. Addis

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 763-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Spirrison ◽  
Keith Noland

The Treatment Evaluation Inventory was used by 164 undergraduates to rate the acceptability of each of six treatments. The differences between the (scale-corrected) total score and the total of items representing the short form were analyzed. Analysis suggested that the short form, as compared to the original scale, systematically underestimates the acceptability of overcorrection and overestimates the acceptability of differential reinforcement of other behavior.


Author(s):  
Philippe Landreville ◽  
Anne Guérette

ABSTRACTPregraduate students (N = 144) used a modified version of the Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI; Kazdin, 1980a) to rate the acceptability of one of three treatments for depression (cognitive therapy, cognitive bibliotherapy, and antidepressant medication) for one of three cases of a depressed elderly person (mild, moderate or severe symptoms). Factorial analysis of the modified version of the TEI revealed two factors (treatment acceptability and negative aspects) which accounted for 72.8 per cent of the total variance. The modified TEI was shown to possess good concurrent validity as well as good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Subjects rated all treatments as equally acceptable, and treatments were judged more acceptable for mild to moderate symptoms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document