Composite Resin Microhardness: The Influence of Light Curing Method, Composite Shade, and Depth of Cure

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Henrique Zanchi ◽  
Flávio Fernando Demarco ◽  
Camila Silveira de Araújo ◽  
Marcelo Thomé Schein ◽  
Sinval Adalberto Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Curing Time ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Depth Of Cure ◽  
Quartz Tungsten Halogen ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Curing Method ◽  
Hardness Values ◽  
Knoop Indenter

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure on composite microhardness. Methods and Materials Forty-eight specimens with 4 mm of depth were prepared with a hybrid composite (Filtek Z-100, 3M ESPE); 24 with shade A1 and the remaining with shade C2. For each shade, two light curing units (LCUs) were used: a quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) LCU (Optilight Plus - Gnatus) and a light emitting diode (LED) LCU (LEC 470 II - MM Optics). The LED LCU was tested using two exposure times (LED 40 seconds and LED 60 seconds). After 24-hour storage, three indentations were made at mm depth intervals using a Knoop indenter. Data were submitted to three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results The three factors tested (light curing method, shade, and depth) had a significant influence on the composite microhardness (p<0.05). All groups presented similar hardness values in the first mm, except for composite shade C2 cured with LED for 40 seconds. The hardness decreased with depth, especially for shade C2 for 40 seconds. Increasing light-curing time with LED produced hardness values similar to the QTH. Conclusions The light curing method including variations of time, the depth of cure, and the composite shade influence the composite microhardness. Clinical Significance Clinicians should avoid thicker increments when working with composite restorations. Extended light-curing time might be indicated depending on the composite shade and on the light-curing device. Citation de Araújo CS, Schein MT, Zanchi CH, Rodrigues SA Jr, Demarco FF. Composite Resin Microhardness: The Influence of Light Curing Method, Composite Shade, and Depth of Cure. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 May; (9)4:043-050.

scholarly journals Effect of the increase of energy density on knoop hardness of dental composites light-cured by conventional QTH, LED and xenon plasma arc

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Américo Bortolazzo Correr ◽  
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti ◽  
Lourenço Correr Sobrinho ◽  
Rubens Nisie Tango ◽  
Luis Felipe Jochims Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Density ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Knoop Hardness ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Plasma Arc ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Quartz Tungsten Halogen ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Cylindrical Cavities ◽  
Hardness Values

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the increase of energy density on Knoop hardness of Z250 and Esthet-X composite resins. Cylindrical cavities (3 mm in diameter X 3 mm in depth) were prepared on the buccal surface of 144 bovine incisors. The composite resins were bulk-inserted and polymerized using different light-curing units and times: conventional QTH (quartz-tungsten-halogen; 700 mW/cm²; 20 s, 30 s and 40 s); LED (light-emitting diode; 440 mW/cm²; 20 s, 30 s and 40 s); PAC (xenon plasma arc; 1700 mW/cm²; 3 s, 4.5 s and 6 s). The specimens were stored at 37°C for 24 h prior to sectioning for Knoop hardness assessment. Three measurements were obtained for each depth: top surface, 1 mm and 2 mm. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Regardless of the light source or energy density, Knoop hardness of Z250 was statistically significant higher than that of Esthet-X (p<0.05). Specimens cured with PAC had lower hardness than those cured with QTH and LED (p<0.05). Higher Knoop hardness was obtained when the energy density was increased for LED and PAC (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found for QTH. Knoop hardness values decreased with the increase of depth. The increase of energy density produced composites with higher Knoop hardness means using LED and PAC.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Different Light-Curing Units—Light-Emitting Diodes and Quartz–Tungsten–Halogen-Based Light-Curing Units in Polymerization of Posterior Composite: An In Vitro Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 060-064
Author(s):  
R. Bansal ◽  
M. Bansal ◽  
S. Walia ◽  
C. Gupta ◽  
L. Bansal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Hardness Test ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Halogen Lamp ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Quartz Tungsten Halogen ◽  
Light Curing

Abstract Objective To assess the adequacy of various light-curing units to polymerize the posterior composite resin. Materials and Methods Specimens were prepared by placing a single increment of posterior composite resin in split cylindrical metallic mold of dimension (6.0 mm in diameter and 5 mm in depth). Polymerization was done by utilizing one quartz-tungsten-halogen and three light-emitting diode light-curing units of different powers. The specimens of composite resin were then mounted on metallic molds utilizing autopolymerizing acrylic resin. After polishing, the complete setting of composite resin material was analyzed using Vickers hardness test. Results Showed in each group, hardness reduced as we moved from upper to lower surface of composite resin. Furthermore, hardness increased as intensity of light was increased. The maximum hardness was detected when light-emitting diode light-curing unit having intensity of 1,250 mW/cm2 was utilized and least hardness was detected when halogen lamp having intensity 418 mW/cm2 was utilized and results were found to be highly significant (p < 0.01). Conclusion It was concluded that increased top and bottom hardness can be accomplished by utilizing the light-curing unit of high intensity.

scholarly journals Surface Hardness of Nanohybrid and Microhybrid Resin Composites Cured by Light Emitting Diode and Quartz Tungsten Halogen Light Curing Systems: An Invitro Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuradha Vitthal Wankhade ◽  
Sharad Basavraj Kamat ◽  
Santosh Irappa Hugar ◽  
Girish Shankar Nanjannawar ◽  
Sumit Balasaheb Vhate
Keyword(s):  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Quartz Tungsten Halogen ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Curing Systems

Introduction: New generation composite resin materials have revolutionized the art of aesthetic dentistry. The clinical success is dependent on effective polymerisation and surface hardness which in turn are dependent on the performance of Light Curing Units (LCU). This study utilises surface hardness as a measure of degree of polymerisation of composite resins achieved by LCUs. Aim: To evaluate the difference in surface hardness of nanohybrid and microhybrid resin composites cured by light curing systems, Light Emitting Diode (LED) and Quartz Tungsten Halogen (QTH). Materials and Methods: In this invitro experimental study, two types of hybrid composites (Nanohybrid and Microhybrid) were tested for surface hardness by using two different light curing systems (LED and QTH). All the Nanohybrid and Microhybrid specimens were cured using LED and QTH LCUs, thus giving four combinations. A total of 60 specimens (6 mm diameter and 2 mm depth) were prepared using Teflon mould with 15 samples for each combination. Surface hardness was measured on upper and lower surface after 24 hours and hardness ratio was calculated. Data was analysed using independent t-test for intergroup comparison. Level of significance was kept at 5%. Results: Surface hardness of resin composites cured by LED LCU was greater than those cured by QTH LCU. Additionally, the hardness value was greater for the upper surface. Nanohybrids showed better surface hardness than Microhybrids for both the LCUs. Conclusion: Nanohybrid composite resins and LED system were found to be more effective in terms of surface hardness as compared to their counterparts.

scholarly journals Evaluation of depth of cure and Knoop hardness in a dental composite photo-activated using different methods

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andresa Carla Obici ◽  
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti ◽  
Lourenço Correr Sobrinho ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes ◽  
Simonides Consani
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Continuous Light ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Knoop Hardness ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
Intermittent Light ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Depth Of Cure ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Hardness Values

The aim of this study was to evaluate the depth of cure and Knoop hardness in the P60 composite resin photo-activated using different methods. A bipartite brass matrix (3 mm in diameter X 11 mm in height) was filled with the composite and photo-activation was performed using continuous light, exponential light, intermittent light, plasma arc curing (PAC) or light-emitting diodes (LED). After opening the matrix, the uncured material was removed with a steel spatula and the polymerized composite was measured using a pachymeter. The specimens were then included in self-curing acrylic resin and worn longitudinally and the hardness was measured on the surface and at depths of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (5%). The results showed that the depth of cure was higher with the intermittent light, followed by continuous light, exponential light, PAC and LED methods. Up to a depth of 2 mm, all methods revealed similar hardness values, but there were differences between them at other depths, at which LED demonstrated the lowest values followed by PAC.

scholarly journals Sorption, solubility and residual monomers of a dental adhesive cured by different light-curing units

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francine do Couto Lima Moreira ◽  
Nelson Roberto Antoniosi Filho ◽  
João Batista de Souza ◽  
Lawrence Gonzaga Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Light Source ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Dental Adhesive ◽  
Quartz Tungsten Halogen ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Storage Times ◽  
Curing Regimes

The aim of this study was to assess polymerization ability of three light-curing units by evaluating the influence of the light source, curing regimen and permeant (water or ethanol) on sorption, solubility and amount of residual monomers of a dental adhesive. Specimens of Adper Single Bond 2 were fabricated using a stainless steel circular matrix (8 mm x 1 mm). One quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) lamp and two light-emitting diode (LED) device at three different curing regimes (L1 = 12 J; L2 = 24 J; L3 = 24 J) were used to cure the specimens. Specimens were stored in two types of permeants - deionized water or 75% ethanol - for two storage times (G1 =7 days; G2 = 30 days). The specimens underwent water sorption and solubility tests, according to ISO 4049:2000 standard. After storage, residual monomers were identified and quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For sorption, L1 showed the highest values and QTH, the lowest. For solubility, in ethanol-stored groups, L1 had also the highest values, and QTH, the lowest, and findings were significantly different from the other curing regimens. L1 leached significantly more monomers than the others, and QTH had the lowest results. In conclusion, the type of light source, the curing regimen and the permeant affected sorption, solubility and amount of residual monomers of the adhesive under study.

Effectiveness of Second-generation Light-emitting Diode (LED) Light Curing Units

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrício Aulo Ogliari ◽  
Ulisses Bastos Campregher ◽  
Susana Maria Werner Samuel ◽  
Carmen Beatriz Borges Fortes ◽  
Alberth David Correa Medina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Strength Properties ◽  
Knoop Hardness ◽  
Curing Time ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Led Light ◽  
Three Samples ◽  
Light Curing

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three commercially available light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCU) (Elipar FreeLight - 3M ESPE; UltraLume LED2 - Ultradent; and Single V - BioArt) for polymerizing Z250-A3 composite (3M ESPE) using Knoop hardness, polymerization depth, and flexural strength properties. Methods and Materials The XL 2500 (3M ESPE) LCU, which is a conventional halogen unit, was used as a control. In all cases the curing time was 20 seconds. Hardness was determined 24 hours after composite cure for 10 samples of 8 mm diameter and 2 mm height for each LCU tested. Samples were stored dry in a lightproof container prior to testing. The depth of cure of the composite was measured immediately after composite polymerization for each LCU using three samples 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height. Flexural strength was determined for five samples 24 hours after immersion in distilled water at 37°C. Each sample measured 25 mm in length, 2 mm in width, and 2 mm in height for each LCU tested. Conclusion The results were treated statistically for comparison of the LCUs. In all cases the results obtained by LED LCUs were not different or were higher than a conventional halogen LCU. Clinical Significance Second generation LED LCUs were as effective as/or more effective than a halogen LCU for polymerization of the used composite. The present study shows second generation LEDs have the potential to replace halogen LCUs. Citation Campregher UB, Samuel SMW, Fortes CBB, Medina ADC, Collares FMC, Ogliari FA. Effectiveness of Second-generation Light-emitting Diode (LED) Light Curing Units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 February;(8)2:035-042.

scholarly journals Light curing time reduction: in vitro evaluation of new intensive light-emitting diode curing units

2005 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mavropoulos ◽  
C. B. Staudt ◽  
S. Kiliaridis ◽  
I. Krejci
Keyword(s):  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Curing Time ◽  
In Vitro Evaluation ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Time Reduction

scholarly journals Light-curing Time and Aging Effects on the Nanomechanical Properties of Methacrylate- and Silorane-based Restorations

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Catelan ◽  
T Pollard ◽  
AK Bedran-Russo ◽  
PH dos Santos ◽  
GMB Ambrosano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Curing Time ◽  
Aging Effects ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Nanomechanical Properties ◽  
Bonded Interface ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Double Time ◽  
Fluid Cell

SUMMARY The aim of this study was to assess the influence of light-curing time on the nanohardness (H) and reduced elastic modulus (Er) of components (underlying dentin, hybrid layer, adhesive, and composite) of methacrylate- and silorane-based restorations after 24 hours and six months of storage. Class II slot preparations were carried out in human molars (n=3) and restored with methacrylate (Clearfil SE Bond [Kuraray] + Filtek Z250 [3M ESPE]) or silorane (LS restorative system [3M ESPE]) restorative systems and light-cured using light-emitting diode at 1390 mW/cm2 for the recommended manufacturers' time or double time. Restorations were sectioned, and bonded dentin-resin interfaces were embedded in epoxy resin and polished for evaluation with a Berkovich fluid cell tip (TI 700 Ubi-1 nanoindenter, Hysitron). Data were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey's test (alpha=0.05). Overall, the H and Er values were higher for methacrylate-based restorations than for silorane materials (p≤0.05), an increase in curing time did not improve the H and Er of the bonded interface components of either material (p&gt;0.05), and aging significantly decreased the mechanical properties of interface components of both resin-based restorative systems (p≤0.05). In general, nanomechanical properties decreased after six months of storage, the methacrylate restorative system exhibited higher H and Er than silorane, and light-curing time did not influence the properties tested.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document