scholarly journals Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) in the Diagnosis of Ligamentous and Meniscal Tears of the Knee. Correlation with Arthroscopic Finding.

1996 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1025-1028
Author(s):  
Satoshi Nakamura ◽  
Tsukasa Teramoto ◽  
Katsuro Iwasaki ◽  
Kenji Miyahara
2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1512-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
SØREN RYTTER ◽  
LILLI KIRKESKOV JENSEN ◽  
JENS PETER BONDE ◽  
ANNE GRETHE JURIK ◽  
NIELS EGUND

Objective.To evaluate the association between occupational kneeling and degenerative meniscal tears.Methods.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of both knees was conducted in 92 male floor layers and 49 male graphic designers (referents), with a mean age of 55.6 years (range 42–70 yrs). The presence of grade 3 MRI signal intensities indicating degenerative tears of the anterior, middle, and posterior one-third of the lateral and medial menisci was assessed on 1.5-Tesla MRI scans. The odds ratio (OR) of meniscal tears was determined among floor layers compared to graphic designers. Using logistic regression, models were adjusted for age, body mass index, and knee-straining sports.Results.Degenerative tears were significantly more prevalent in the medial meniscus among floor layers than among graphic designers [OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–4.98] and significantly more floor layers had medial tears in both knees (OR 3.46, 95% CI 1.41–8.48). Tears extending to the tibial aspect and localized in the middle and posterior one-third of the medial meniscus were most prevalent. Lateral meniscal tears were predominantly unilateral and the prevalence of lateral tears did not differ between the 2 study groups. Knee complaints occurred in about 50% of all floor layers, irrespective of the presence of meniscal tears.Conclusion.Occupational kneeling increases the risk of degenerative tears in the medial but not the lateral menisci in both knees.


1994 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1413-1418
Author(s):  
Kenji Miyahara ◽  
Keisuke Sera ◽  
Tatsuyuki Taniguchi ◽  
Kaname Komuta ◽  
Tsukasa Teramoto

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Griffith ◽  
Radhesh Krishna Lalam

AbstractWhen it comes to examining the brachial plexus, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary investigations. US is well placed for screening most extraforaminal pathologies, whereas MRI is more sensitive and accurate for specific clinical indications. For example, MRI is probably the preferred technique for assessment of trauma because it enables a thorough evaluation of both the intraspinal and extraspinal elements, although US can depict extraforaminal neural injury with a high level of accuracy. Conversely, US is probably the preferred technique for examination of neurologic amyotrophy because a more extensive involvement beyond the brachial plexus is the norm, although MRI is more sensitive than US for evaluating muscle denervation associated with this entity. With this synergy in mind, this review highlights the tips for examining the brachial plexus with US and MRI.


Endoscopy ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
BP McMahon ◽  
JB Frøkjær ◽  
A Bergmann ◽  
DH Liao ◽  
E Steffensen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 10-23
Author(s):  
T. A. Akhadov ◽  
S. Yu. Guryakov ◽  
M. V. Ublinsky

For a long time, there was a need to apply magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique for lung visualization in clinical practice. The development of this method is stimulated by necessity of the emergence of an alternative to computed tomography, especially when radiation and injection of iodine-containing contrast agents are contraindicated or undesirable, for example, in pregnant women and children, people with intolerance to iodinated contrast. One of the reasons why lung MRI is still rarely used is lack of elaborated standardized protocols that would be adapted to clinical needs of medical society. This publication is a current literature review on the use of MRI in lung studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document