scholarly journals Biogenic volatile organic compound ambient mixing ratios and emission rates in the Alaskan Arctic tundra

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (23) ◽  
pp. 6219-6236
Author(s):  
Hélène Angot ◽  
Katelyn McErlean ◽  
Lu Hu ◽  
Dylan B. Millet ◽  
Jacques Hueber ◽  
...  

Abstract. Rapid Arctic warming, a lengthening growing season, and the increasing abundance of biogenic volatile-organic-compound-emitting shrubs are all anticipated to increase atmospheric biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) in the Arctic atmosphere, with implications for atmospheric oxidation processes and climate feedbacks. Quantifying these changes requires an accurate understanding of the underlying processes driving BVOC emissions in the Arctic. While boreal ecosystems have been widely studied, little attention has been paid to Arctic tundra environments. Here, we report terpenoid (isoprene, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes) ambient mixing ratios and emission rates from key dominant vegetation species at Toolik Field Station (TFS; 68∘38′ N, 149∘36′ W) in northern Alaska during two back-to-back field campaigns (summers of 2018 and 2019) covering the entire growing season. Isoprene ambient mixing ratios observed at TFS fell within the range of values reported in the Eurasian taiga (0–500 parts per trillion by volume – pptv), while monoterpene and sesquiterpene ambient mixing ratios were respectively close to and below the instrumental quantification limit (∼2 pptv). Isoprene surface emission rates ranged from 0.2 to 2250 µgC m−2 h−1 (mean of 85 µgC m−2 h−1) and monoterpene emission rates remained, on average, below 1 µgC m−2 h−1 over the course of the study. We further quantified the temperature dependence of isoprene emissions from local vegetation, including Salix spp. (a known isoprene emitter), and compared the results to predictions from the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1). Our observations suggest a 180 %–215 % emission increase in response to a 3–4 ∘C warming, and the MEGAN2.1 temperature algorithm exhibits a close fit with observations for enclosure temperatures in the 0–30 ∘C range. The data presented here provide a baseline for investigating future changes in the BVOC emission potential of the under-studied Arctic tundra environment.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène Angot ◽  
Katelyn McErlean ◽  
Lu Hu ◽  
Dylan B. Millet ◽  
Jacques Hueber ◽  
...  

Abstract. Rapid Arctic warming, a lengthening growing season, and increasing abundance of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC)-emitting shrubs are all anticipated to increase atmospheric BVOCs in the Arctic atmosphere, with implications for atmospheric oxidation processes and climate feedbacks. Quantifying these changes requires an accurate understanding of the underlying processes driving BVOC emissions in the Arctic. While boreal ecosystems have been widely studied, little attention has been paid to Arctic tundra environments. Here, we report terpenoid (isoprene, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes) ambient mixing ratios and emission rates from key dominant vegetation species at Toolik Field Station (TFS; 68°38' N, 149°36' W) in northern Alaska during two back-to-back field campaigns (summers 2018 and 2019) covering the entire growing season. Isoprene ambient mixing ratios observed at TFS fell within the range of values reported in the Eurasian taiga (0–500 pptv), while monoterpene and sesquiterpene ambient mixing ratios were respectively close to and below the instrumental quantification limit (~ 2 pptv). We further quantified the temperature dependence of isoprene emissions from local vegetation including Salix spp. (a known isoprene emitter), and compared the results to predictions from the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1). Our observations suggest a 180–215 % emission increase in response to a 3–4 °C warming. The MEGAN2.1 temperature algorithm exhibits a close fit with observations for enclosure temperatures below 30 °C. Above 30 °C, MEGAN2.1 predicts an isoprene emission plateau that is not observed in the enclosure flux measurements at TFS. More studies are needed to better constrain the warming response of isoprene and other BVOCs for a wide range of Arctic species.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 11505-11518
Author(s):  
Chinmoy Sarkar ◽  
Gracie Wong ◽  
Anne Mielnik ◽  
Sanjeevi Nagalingam ◽  
Nicole Jenna Gross ◽  
...  

Abstract. A compound was observed using airborne proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) measurements in the emission plumes from the Daesan petrochemical facility in South Korea. The compound was detected at m/z 43.018 on the PTR-TOF-MS and was tentatively identified as ketene, a rarely measured reactive volatile organic compound (VOC). Estimated ketene mixing ratios as high as ∼ 50 ppb (parts per billion) were observed in the emission plumes. Emission rates of ketene from the facility were estimated using a horizontal advective flux approach and ranged from 84–316 kg h−1. These emission rates were compared to the emission rates of major known VOCs such as benzene, toluene, and acetaldehyde. Significant correlations (r2 > 0.7) of ketene with methanol, acetaldehyde, benzene, and toluene were observed for the peak emissions, indicating commonality of emission sources. The calculated average ketene OH reactivity for the emission plumes over Daesan ranged from 3.33–7.75 s−1, indicating the importance of the quantification of ketene to address missing OH reactivity in the polluted environment. The calculated average O3 production potential for ketene ranged from 2.98–6.91 ppb h−1. Our study suggests that ketene, or any possible VOC species detected at m/z 43.018, has the potential to significantly influence local photochemistry, and therefore, further studies focusing on the photooxidation and atmospheric fate of ketene through chamber studies are required to improve our current understanding of VOC OH reactivity and, hence, tropospheric O3 production.


Ecosystems ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 860-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Faubert ◽  
Päivi Tiiva ◽  
Åsmund Rinnan ◽  
Janne Räsänen ◽  
Jarmo K. Holopainen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document