Networks of Air Quality Sensors and Their Use for High-resolution Mapping of Urban Air Quality

Author(s):  
Philipp Schneider ◽  
Nuria Castell ◽  
Paul Hamer ◽  
Sam-Erik Walker ◽  
Alena Bartonova

<p>One of the most promising applications of low-cost sensor systems for air quality is the possibility to deploy them in relatively dense networks and to use this information for mapping urban air quality at unprecedented spatial detail. More and more such dense sensor networks are being set up worldwide, particularly for relatively inexpensive nephelometers that provide PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations with often quite reasonable accuracy. However, air pollutants typically exhibit significant spatial variability in urban areas, so using data from sensor networks alone tends to result in maps with unrealistic spatial patterns, unless the network density is extremely high. One solution is to use the output from an air quality model as an a priori field and as such to use the combined knowledge of both model and sensor network to provide improved maps of urban air quality. Here we present our latest work on combining the observations from low-cost sensor systems with data from urban-scale air quality models, with the goal of providing realistic, high-resolution, and up-to-date maps of urban air quality.</p><p>In previous years we have used a geostatistical approach for mapping air quality (Schneider et al., 2017), exploiting both low-cost sensors and model information. The system has now been upgraded to a data assimilation approach that integrates the observations from a heterogeneous sensor network into an urban-scale air quality model while considering the sensor-specific uncertainties. The approach further ensures that the spatial representativity of each observation is automatically derived as a combination of a model climatology and a function of distance. We demonstrate the methodology using examples from Oslo and other cities in Norway. Initial results indicate that the method is robust and provides realistic spatial patterns of air quality for the main air pollutants that were evaluated, even in areas where only limited observations are available. Conversely, the model output is constrained by the sensor data, thus adding value to both input datasets.</p><p>While several challenging issues remain, modern air quality sensor systems have reached a maturity level at which some of them can provide an intra-sensor consistency and robustness that makes it feasible to use networks of such systems as a data source for mapping urban air quality at high spatial resolution. We present our current approach for mapping urban air quality with the help of low-cost sensor networks and demonstrate both that it can provide realistic results and that the uncertainty of each individual sensor system can be taken into account in a robust and meaningful manner.</p><p> </p><p>Schneider, P., Castell N., Vogt M., Dauge F. R., Lahoz W. A., and Bartonova A., 2017. Mapping urban air quality in near real-time using observations from low-cost sensors and model information. Environment international, 106, 234-247.</p>

1981 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1020-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Seigneur ◽  
Thomas W. Tesche ◽  
Philip M. Roth ◽  
Larry E. Reid

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wenzel ◽  
Jia Chen ◽  
Florian Dietrich ◽  
Sebastian T. Thekkekara ◽  
Daniel Zollitsch ◽  
...  

<p>Modeling urban air pollutants is a challenging task not only due to the complicated, small-scale topography but also due to the complex chemical processes within the chemical regime of a city. Nitrogen oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM) and other tracer gases, e.g. formaldehyde, hold information about which chemical regime is present in a city. As we are going to test and apply chemical models for urban pollution – especially with respect to spatial and temporally variability – measurement data with high spatial and temporal resolution are critical.</p><p>Since governmental monitoring stations of air pollutants such as PM, NOx, ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) or carbon monoxide (CO) are large and costly, they are usually only sparsely distributed throughout a city. Hence, the official monitoring sites are not sufficient to investigate whether small-scale variability and its integrated effects are captured well by models. Smart networks consisting of small low-cost air pollutant sensors have the ability to provide the required grid density and are therefore the tool of choice when it comes to setting up or validating urban modeling frameworks. Such sensor networks have been established and run by several groups, achieving spatial and temporal high-resolution concentration maps [1, 2].</p><p>After having conducted a measurement campaign in 2016 to create a high-resolution NO<sub>2</sub> concentration map for Munich [3], we are currently setting up a low-cost sensor network to measure NOx, PM, O<sub>3</sub> and CO concentrations as well as meteorological parameters [4]. The sensors are stand-alone, so that they do not demand mains supply, which gives us a high flexibility in their deployment. Validating air quality models not only requires dense but also high-accuracy measurements. Therefore, we will calibrate our sensor nodes on a weekly basis using a mobile reference instrument and apply the gathered sensor data to a Machine Learning model of the sensor nodes. This will help minimize the often occurring drawbacks of low-cost sensors such as sensor drift, environmental influences and sensor cross sensitivities.</p><p> </p><p>[1] Bigi, A., Mueller, M., Grange, S. K., Ghermandi, G., and Hueglin, C.: Performance of NO, NO2 low cost sensors and three calibration approaches within a real world application, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 3717–3735, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-3717-2018, 2018</p><p>[2] Kim, J., Shusterman, A. A., Lieschke, K. J., Newman, C., and Cohen, R. C.: The BErkeley Atmospheric CO2 Observation Network: field calibration and evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 1937–1946, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1937-2018, 2018</p><p>[3] Zhu, Y., Chen, J., Bi, X., Kuhlmann, G., Chan, K. L., Dietrich, F., Brunner, D., Ye, S., and Wenig, M.: Spatial and temporal representativeness of point measurements for nitrogen dioxide pollution levels in cities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13241–13251, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13241-2020, 2020</p><p>[4] Zollitsch, D., Chen, J., Dietrich, F., Voggenreiter, B., Setili, L., and Wenig, M.: Low-Cost Air Quality Sensor Network in Munich, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-19276, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-19276, 2020</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 132-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Beauchamp ◽  
Laure Malherbe ◽  
Chantal de Fouquet ◽  
Laurent Létinois ◽  
Frédéric Tognet

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Martin Seaton ◽  
Ian Leslie ◽  
Amy Stidworthy ◽  
Rod Jones ◽  
Jo Dicks ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sotiris Vardoulakis ◽  
Bernard Fisher ◽  
Norbert Gonzalez-Flesca ◽  
Koulis Pericleous

Proceedings ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Penza ◽  
Domenico Suriano ◽  
Valerio Pfister ◽  
Mario Prato ◽  
Gennaro Cassano

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suriano ◽  
M. Prato ◽  
V. Pfister ◽  
G. Cassano ◽  
S. Dipinto ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Carruthers ◽  
Amy Stidworthy ◽  
Daniel Clarke ◽  
Jo Dicks ◽  
Rod Jones ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikari Shimadera ◽  
Hiroshi Hayami ◽  
Satoru Chatani ◽  
Tazuko Morikawa ◽  
Yu Morino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document