The interactive effect of land-use and soil depth on microbial activity during drying and rewetting – an experimental and computational investigation

Author(s):  
Blandine Lyonnard ◽  
Albert Brangarí ◽  
Johannes Rousk

<p>The alternation of drought periods and rainfall events, intensified by climate change, has huge impacts on carbon cycle dynamics. Changes in soil moisture induce significant releases of CO<sub>2</sub> from soils to the atmosphere. This phenomenon, known as the Birch effect, is accompanied by drastic changes in the microbiology as well. Based on the response patterns of microbial growth and respiration to the rewetting of dry soil, two different types have been identified. Microbial communities either respond immediately after rewetting and start increasing growth in a linear way (so-called “type 1” response), or they recover growth after a lag phase preceding an exponential increase (“type 2” response). The reasons behind the different responses, including how harsh the drought is perceived by the communities and what history of moisture conditions they were subjected to, are not yet fully resolved. Moreover, most studies focus on the top few centimeters of soil and the effect of depth and the contribution of deeper soils to the overall dynamics have been largely overlooked.</p><p>In order to investigate the influence of depth on microbial dynamics during drought and rainfall events, taking into account land-use, we performed a set of laboratory experiments that were also used to parameterize and validate numerical modelling-based analysis of the ecology driving soil biogeochemistry. We collected soil samples from permanent pasture and tilled and cropped arable fields at two different depths (0-5 cm and 20-30 cm). We then subjected them to a week of air drying followed by rewetting to optimal moisture, and measured respiration, bacterial growth and fungal growth at high temporal resolution.</p><p>The patterns were significantly different between soil types, showing type 1 responses in arable soils and type 2 responses in pasture soils. The type 1 responses in arable soils were also characterized by a higher carbon use efficiency after the rewetting perturbation. Moreover, the deeper microbial communities were relatively more affected by the drying and rewetting experiment than the respective shallow ones. Taken together, these results suggested that the drying and rewetting event was perceived by soil microbial communities as a stronger disturbance in the pasture soils, and at deeper depths, as illustrated by more sensitive microbial responses.</p><p>We then incorporated these laboratory data into a soil microbial model (EcoSMMARTS) and identified the depth- and community-specific differences in osmolyte regulation, necromass turnover, and cell residue activity as the microbial mechanisms potentially explaining the observed patterns. These findings provide insights into soil-climate feedback from different ecosystems, where intensively used arable soils were more resilient than permanent pasture soils and stored larger amounts of carbon due to a higher fraction of microbial growth to respiration under climate change scenarios. The capacity of microbial communities to adapt and regulate soil carbon dynamics is not uniform through the soil profile nor across management practices, therefore indicating a need for future studies incorporating depth and especially land-use which has the strongest effect on microbial activity during soil drying and rewetting.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainara Leizeaga ◽  
Lettice Hicks ◽  
Albert Brangarí ◽  
Carla Cruz-Paredes ◽  
Menale Wondie ◽  
...  

<p>Climate change predicts an increase in temperature and an intensification of the hydrological cycles resulting in more extreme drought and rainfall events. When dry soils experience a rainfall event, there is a big CO<sub>2</sub> release from soil to the atmosphere which is regulated by soil microorganisms. In the present study, we set out to investigate how drought and warming affects the soil microbial responses to drying and rewetting (DRW); and how those responses are affected by differences in land use. Previous work has shown that exposure DRW cycles in the laboratory and in the field can induce faster recovery (more ‘resilient’) of the microbial responses after a DRW cycle. In addition, a history of drought has been suggested to result in microbial communities with higher carbon use efficiency (CUE) during DRW in a wet heathland in Northern Europe and in semi-arid grasslands in Texas. We wanted to extend these observations to subtropical environments.</p><p> </p><p>With the aim of simulating drought and warming, rain shelters and open top chambers (OTC) were installed in Northern Ethiopia in 2 contrasting land-uses (a degraded cropland and a pristine forest) for 1.5 years. Soils were then sampled and exposed to a DRW cycle in the laboratory. Microbial growth and respiration responses were followed with high temporal resolution over 3 weeks, as well as, changes in microbial community structure.  </p><p> </p><p>Microbial functions universally showed a resilient response after a DRW cycle, with bacterial growth and fungal growth increasing immediately upon rewetting linked with the expected respiration response. The field treatments and land-use differences, therefore, did not have an effect on the resilience of soil microbial communities to DRW cycles. There were differences between the two main decomposer groups: fungi were more resilient than bacteria, as they showed a faster recovery rate. Microbial CUE upon rewetting responded differently in the different field treatments and land-uses. CUE was generally higher in croplands than in forests. Besides, while simulated drought reduced CUE, simulated drought increased CUE. These differences might be explained by either (i) the selection or more efficient microbial communities due to a higher exposure to DRW events or (ii) differences in resource availability (i.e. plant input).  </p>


Elem Sci Anth ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Pold ◽  
Luiz A. Domeignoz-Horta ◽  
Kristen M. DeAngelis

Soils store more carbon than the biosphere and atmosphere combined, and the efficiency to which soil microorganisms allocate carbon to growth rather than respiration is increasingly considered a proxy for the soil capacity to store carbon. This carbon use efficiency (CUE) is measured via different methods, and more recently, the 18O-H2O method has been embraced as a significant improvement for measuring CUE of soil microbial communities. Based on extrapolating 18O incorporation into DNA to new biomass, this measurement makes various implicit assumptions about the microbial community at hand. Here we conducted a literature review to evaluate how viable these assumptions are and then developed a mathematical model to test how violating them affects estimates of the growth component of CUE in soil. We applied this model to previously collected data from two kinds of soil microbial communities. By changing one parameter at a time, we confirmed our previous observation that CUE was reduced by fungal removal. Our results also show that depending on the microbial community composition, there can be substantial discrepancies between estimated and true microbial growth. Of the numerous implicit assumptions that might be violated, not accounting for the contribution of sources of oxygen other than extracellular water to DNA leads to a consistent underestimation of CUE. We present a framework that allows researchers to evaluate how their experimental conditions may influence their 18O-H2O-based CUE measurements and suggest the parameters that need further constraining to more accurately quantify growth and CUE.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Fuchslueger

<p>The Amazon rainforest is an important sink for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> counteracting increased emissions from anthropogenic fossil fuel combustion and land use change storing large amounts of carbon in plant biomass and soils. However, large parts of the Amazon Basin are characterized by highly weathered soils (ultisols and oxisols) with low availability of rock-derived phosphorus (and cations), which are mostly occluded in soil or bound in organic matter. Such low phosphorus availability is thought to be (co-)limiting plant productivity. However, much less is known whether low phosphorus availability influences the activity of heterotrophic microbial communities controlling litter and soil organic matter decomposition and thereby long-term carbon sequestration in tropical soils.</p><p>In tropical soils high temperature and humid conditions allow overall high microbial activity. Over a larger soil phosphorus fertility gradient across several Amazonian rainforest sites, at low P sites almost 40 % of total P was stored in microbial biomass, highlighting the competitive strength of microorganisms and their importance as P reservoir. Across all sites soil microbial biomass was a significant predictor for soil microbial respiration, but mass-specific respiration rates (normalized by microbial biomass C) rather decreased at higher soil P. Using the incorporation of <sup>18</sup>O from labelled water into DNA (i.e., a substrate-independent method) to determine microbial growth, we found significantly lower microbial growth rates per unit of microbial biomass at higher soil P. This resulted in a lower microbial carbon use efficiency, at a narrower C:P stoichiometry in soils with higher P levels, and pointed towards a microbial co-limitation of phosphorus and carbon at low soil P levels. Furthermore, data from a multi-year nutrient manipulation experiment in French Guiana and from short-term lab incubations suggest that microbial communities thriving at low P levels are highly efficient in taking up and storing added P, but do not necessarily respond with increased growth.</p><p>Soil microbial communities play a crucial role in soil carbon and phosphorus cycling in tropical soils as potent competitors for available P. They also play an important role in storing and buffering P losses from highly weathered tropical soils. The potential non-homoeostatic stoichiometric behavior of microbial communities in P cycling is important to consider in soil and ecosystem models based on stoichiometric relationships.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 2988-2999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana S. Paula ◽  
Jorge L. M. Rodrigues ◽  
Jizhong Zhou ◽  
Liyou Wu ◽  
Rebecca C. Mueller ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 1641-1650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian L Lauber ◽  
Kelly S Ramirez ◽  
Zach Aanderud ◽  
Jay Lennon ◽  
Noah Fierer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chupei Shi ◽  
Carolina Urbina Malo ◽  
Ye Tian ◽  
Shasha Zhang ◽  
Marilena Heitger ◽  
...  

<p>Human activities have caused global warming by 0.95 °C since the industrial revolution, and average temperatures in Austria have risen by almost 2 °C since 1880. Increased global mean temperatures have been reported to accelerate carbon (C) cycling, but also to promote nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the extent of warming-induced increases in soil C, N and P processes can differ, causing an eventual uncoupling of biogeochemical C, N and P cycles, and leading to altered elemental imbalances between available plant and soil resources and soil microbial communities. The altered dynamics in soil C and nutrient availability caused by increased soil temperature could shift the growth-limiting element for soil microorganisms, with strong repercussions on the decomposition, mineralization and sequestration of organic C and nutrients. The latter relates to the conservative cycling of limiting elements while elements in excess are mineralized and released at greater rates by microbial communities.</p><p>Despite the many laboratory and in situ studies investigating factors that limit soil microbial activity, most of them explored nutrient addition effects on soil respiration or soil enzyme activities. A critical assessment, however, clearly indicated the inappropriateness of these measures to deduce growth-limiting nutrients for soil microbes. Similar to studies of plant nutrient limitation, unequivocal assessment of soil microbial element limitation can only be derived from the response of microbial growth to element amendments. To our knowledge this has not been performed on soils undergoing long-term soil warming.</p><p>In this study, we therefore investigated the effect of long-term soil warming on microbial nutrient limitation based on microbial growth measurements in a temperate calcareous forest soil. Soil samples were taken from two soil depths (0-10, 10-20 cm) in both control and heated plots in the Achenkirch soil warming project (>15 yrs soil warming by + 4 °C). Soil samples were pre-incubated at their corresponding field temperature after sieving and removal of visible roots. The soils were amended with different combinations of glucose-C, inorganic/organic N and inorganic/organic P in a full factorial design, the nutrients being dissolved in <sup>18</sup>O-water. After 24 hours of incubation, microbial growth was measured based on the <sup>18</sup>O incorporation into genomic DNA. Nutrient (co)limitation was determined by comparing microbial growth responses upon C and nutrient additions relative to unamended controls. Basal respiration was also measured based on the increase in headspace CO<sub>2</sub>, allowing to estimate microbial C use efficiency (CUE). The fate of C and nutrient amendments was finally traced by measurements of inorganic and organic extractable and microbial biomass C, N and P. This study will thereby provide key insights into potential shifts in limiting nutrients for microbial growth under long-term soil warming, and into concomitant effects on soil C and nutrient cycles.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document