scholarly journals Characterizing coarse-resolution watershed soil moisture heterogeneity using fine-scale simulations

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1967-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Riley ◽  
C. Shen
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Reduced Order Models ◽  
Watershed Scale ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reduced Order ◽  
Coarse Resolution ◽  
Soil Moisture Heterogeneity

Abstract. Watershed-scale hydrological and biogeochemical models are usually discretized at resolutions coarser than where significant heterogeneities in topographic, subsurface abiotic and biotic, and surface vegetation exist. Here we report on a method to use fine-resolution (220 m gridcells) hydrological model predictions to build reduced order models of the statistical properties of near-surface soil moisture at coarse-resolution (25 times coarser; ~7 km). We applied a watershed-scale hydrological model (PAWS+CLM) that has been previously tested in several watersheds and developed simple, relatively accurate (R2 ~ 0.7–0.8) reduced order models for the relationship between mean and higher-order moments of near-surface soil moisture during the non-frozen periods over five years. When applied to transient predictions, soil moisture variance and skewness were relatively accurately predicted (R2 ~ 0.7–0.8), while the kurtosis was less accurately predicted (R2 ~ 0.5). We tested sixteen system attributes hypothesized to explain the negative relationship between soil moisture mean and variance toward the wetter end of the distribution and found that, in the model, 59% of the variance of this relationship can be explained by the elevation gradient convolved with mean evapotranspiration. We did not find significant relationships between the time rate of change of soil moisture variance and covariances between mean moisture and evapotranspiration, drainage, or soil properties, as has been reported in other modeling studies. As seen in previous observational studies, the predicted soil moisture skewness was predominantly positive and negative in drier and wetter regions, respectively. In individual coarse-resolution gridcells, the transition between positive and negative skewness occurred at a mean soil moisture of ~0.25–0.3. The type of numerical modeling experiments presented here can improve understanding of the causes of soil moisture heterogeneity across scales, and inform the types of observations required to more accurately represent unresolved spatial heterogeneity in regional and global hydrological models.

scholarly journals Characterizing coarse-resolution watershed soil moisture heterogeneity using fine-scale simulations

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2463-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. J. Riley ◽  
C. Shen
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Reduced Order Models ◽  
Watershed Scale ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Reduced Order ◽  
Coarse Resolution ◽  
Soil Moisture Heterogeneity

Abstract. Watershed-scale hydrological and biogeochemical models are usually discretized at resolutions coarser than where significant heterogeneities in topography, abiotic factors (e.g., soil properties), and biotic (e.g., vegetation) factors exist. Here we report on a method to use fine-scale (220 m grid cells) hydrological model predictions to build reduced-order models of the statistical properties of near-surface soil moisture at coarse resolution (25 times coarser, ~7 km). We applied a watershed-scale hydrological model (PAWS-CLM4) that has been previously tested in several watersheds. Using these simulations, we developed simple, relatively accurate (R2 ~0.7–0.8), reduced-order models for the relationship between mean and higher-order moments of near-surface soil moisture during the nonfrozen periods over five years. When applied to transient predictions, soil moisture variance and skewness were relatively accurately predicted (R2 0.7–0.8), while the kurtosis was less accurately predicted (R2 ~0.5). We also tested 16 system attributes hypothesized to explain the negative relationship between soil moisture mean and variance toward the wetter end of the distribution and found that, in the model, 59% of the variance of this relationship can be explained by the elevation gradient convolved with mean evapotranspiration. We did not find significant relationships between the time rate of change of soil moisture variance and covariances between mean moisture and evapotranspiration, drainage, or soil properties, as has been reported in other modeling studies. As seen in previous observational studies, the predicted soil moisture skewness was predominantly positive and negative in drier and wetter regions, respectively. In individual coarse-resolution grid cells, the transition between positive and negative skewness occurred at a mean soil moisture of ~0.25–0.3. The type of numerical modeling experiments presented here can improve understanding of the causes of soil moisture heterogeneity across scales, and inform the types of observations required to more accurately represent what is often unresolved spatial heterogeneity in regional and global hydrological models.

Vegetation parameter retrieval from SAR data using near-surface soil moisture estimates derived from a hydrological model

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cozmin Lucau-Danila ◽  
Moira Callens ◽  
Pierre Defourny ◽  
Niko E. C. Verhoest ◽  
Valentijn R. N. Pauwels
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Vegetation Parameter ◽  
Sar Data ◽  
Parameter Retrieval

scholarly journals Assimilation of ASCAT near-surface soil moisture into the SIM hydrological model over France

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3829-3841 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Draper ◽  
J.-F. Mahfouf ◽  
J.-C. Calvet ◽  
E. Martin ◽  
W. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Model Soil ◽  
Dry Bias

Abstract. This study examines whether the assimilation of remotely sensed near-surface soil moisture observations might benefit an operational hydrological model, specifically Météo-France's SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU (SIM) model. Soil moisture data derived from ASCAT backscatter observations are assimilated into SIM using a Simplified Extended Kalman Filter (SEKF) over 3.5 years. The benefit of the assimilation is tested by comparison to a delayed cut-off version of SIM, in which the land surface is forced with more accurate atmospheric analyses, due to the availability of additional atmospheric observations after the near-real time data cut-off. However, comparing the near-real time and delayed cut-off SIM models revealed that the main difference between them is a dry bias in the near-real time precipitation forcing, which resulted in a dry bias in the root-zone soil moisture and associated surface moisture flux forecasts. While assimilating the ASCAT data did reduce the root-zone soil moisture dry bias (by nearly 50%), this was more likely due to a bias within the SEKF, than due to the assimilation having accurately responded to the precipitation errors. Several improvements to the assimilation are identified to address this, and a bias-aware strategy is suggested for explicitly correcting the model bias. However, in this experiment the moisture added by the SEKF was quickly lost from the model surface due to the enhanced surface fluxes (particularly drainage) induced by the wetter soil moisture states. Consequently, by the end of each winter, during which frozen conditions prevent the ASCAT data from being assimilated, the model land surface had returned to its original (dry-biased) climate. This highlights that it would be more effective to address the precipitation bias directly, than to correct it by constraining the model soil moisture through data assimilation.

scholarly journals Assimilation of ASCAT near-surface soil moisture into the French SIM hydrological model

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 5427-5464 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Draper ◽  
J.-F. Mahfouf ◽  
J.-C. Calvet ◽  
E. Martin ◽  
W. Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Degree Of Saturation ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
The Mean

Abstract. The impact of assimilating near-surface soil moisture into the SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU (SIM) hydrological model over France is examined. Specifically, the root-zone soil moisture in the ISBA land surface model is constrained over three and a half years, by assimilating the ASCAT-derived surface degree of saturation product, using a Simplified Extended Kalman Filter. In this experiment ISBA is forced with the near-real time SAFRAN analysis, which analyses the variables required to force ISBA from relevant observations available before the real time data cut-off. The assimilation results are tested against ISBA forecasts generated with a higher quality delayed cut-off SAFRAN analysis. Ideally, assimilating the ASCAT data will constrain the ISBA surface state to correct for errors in the near-real time SAFRAN forcing, the most significant of which was a substantial dry bias caused by a dry precipitation bias. The assimilation successfully reduced the mean root-zone soil moisture bias, relative to the delayed cut-off forecasts, by close to 50 % of the open-loop value. The improved soil moisture in the model then led to significant improvements in the forecast hydrological cycle, reducing the drainage, runoff, and evapotranspiration biases (by 17 %, 11 %, and 70 %, respectively). When coupled to the MODCOU hydrogeological model, the ASCAT assimilation also led to improved streamflow forecasts, increasing the mean discharge ratio, relative to the delayed cut off forecasts, from 0.68 to 0.76. These results demonstrate that assimilating near-surface soil moisture observations can effectively constrain the SIM model hydrology, while also confirming the accuracy of the ASCAT surface degree of saturation product. This latter point highlights how assimilation experiments can contribute towards the difficult issue of validating remotely sensed land surface observations over large spatial scales.

scholarly journals Analysis of spatial variability of near-surface soil moisture to increase rainfall-runoff modelling accuracy in SW Hungary

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hegedüs ◽  
S. Czigány ◽  
E. Pirkhoffer ◽  
L. Balatonyi ◽  
R. Hickey
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Watershed Scale ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Moisture Sensor ◽  
Soil Moisture Sensor ◽  
Soil Moisture Data ◽  
Data Points ◽  
Monitoring Stations

AbstractBetween September 5, 2008 and September 5, 2009, near-surface soil moisture time series were collected in the northern part of a 1.7 km2 watershed in SWHungary at 14 monitoring locations using a portable TDR-300 soil moisture sensor. The objectives of this study are to increase the accuracy of soil moisture measurement at watershed scale, to improve flood forecasting accuracy, and to optimize soil moisture sensor density.According to our results, in 10 of 13 cases, a strong correlation exists between the measured soil moisture data of Station 5 and all other monitoring stations; Station 5 is considered representative for the entire watershed. Logically, the selection of the location of the representative measurement point(s) is essential for obtaining representative and accurate soil moisture values for the given watershed. This could be done by (i) employing monitoring stations of higher number at the exploratory phase of the monitoring, (ii) mapping soil physical properties at watershed scale, and (iii) running cross-relational statistical analyses on the obtained data.Our findings indicate that increasing the number of soil moisture data points available for interpolation increases the accuracy of watershed-scale soil moisture estimation. The data set used for interpolation (and estimation of mean antecedent soil moisture values) could be improved (thus, having a higher number of data points) by selecting points of similar properties to the measurement points from the DEM and soil databases. By using a higher number of data points for interpolation, both interpolation accuracy and spatial resolution have increased for the measured soil moisture values for the Pósa Valley.

scholarly journals The impact of near-surface soil moisture assimilation at subseasonal, seasonal, and inter-annual timescales

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 4831-4844 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Draper ◽  
R. Reichle
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Data Assimilation ◽  
Surface Soil ◽  
Root Zone ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Surface Soil Moisture ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
In Situ Observations ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. A 9 year record of Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer – Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) soil moisture retrievals are assimilated into the Catchment land surface model at four locations in the US. The assimilation is evaluated using the unbiased mean square error (ubMSE) relative to watershed-scale in situ observations, with the ubMSE separated into contributions from the subseasonal (SMshort), mean seasonal (SMseas), and inter-annual (SMlong) soil moisture dynamics. For near-surface soil moisture, the average ubMSE for Catchment without assimilation was (1.8 × 10−3 m3 m−3)2, of which 19 % was in SMlong, 26 % in SMseas, and 55 % in SMshort. The AMSR-E assimilation significantly reduced the total ubMSE at every site, with an average reduction of 33 %. Of this ubMSE reduction, 37 % occurred in SMlong, 24 % in SMseas, and 38 % in SMshort. For root-zone soil moisture, in situ observations were available at one site only, and the near-surface and root-zone results were very similar at this site. These results suggest that, in addition to the well-reported improvements in SMshort, assimilating a sufficiently long soil moisture data record can also improve the model representation of important long-term events, such as droughts. The improved agreement between the modeled and in situ SMseas is harder to interpret, given that mean seasonal cycle errors are systematic, and systematic errors are not typically targeted by (bias-blind) data assimilation. Finally, the use of 1-year subsets of the AMSR-E and Catchment soil moisture for estimating the observation-bias correction (rescaling) parameters is investigated. It is concluded that when only 1 year of data are available, the associated uncertainty in the rescaling parameters should not greatly reduce the average benefit gained from data assimilation, although locally and in extreme years there is a risk of increased errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document