scholarly journals The glacial isostatic adjustment signal at present day in northern Europe and the British Isles estimated from geodetic observations and geophysical models

Solid Earth ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 777-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Simon ◽  
Riccardo E. M. Riva ◽  
Marcel Kleinherenbrink ◽  
Thomas Frederikse

Abstract. The glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) signal at present day is constrained via the joint inversion of geodetic observations and GIA models for a region encompassing northern Europe, the British Isles, and the Barents Sea. The constraining data are Global Positioning System (GPS) vertical crustal velocities and GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) gravity data. When the data are inverted with a set of GIA models, the best-fit model for the vertical motion signal has a χ2 value of approximately 1 and a maximum a posteriori uncertainty of 0.3–0.4 mm yr−1. An elastic correction is applied to the vertical land motion rates that accounts for present-day changes to terrestrial hydrology as well as recent mass changes of ice sheets and glaciered regions. Throughout the study area, mass losses from Greenland dominate the elastic vertical signal and combine to give an elastic correction of up to +0.5 mm yr−1 in central Scandinavia. Neglecting to use an elastic correction may thus introduce a small but persistent bias in model predictions of GIA vertical motion even in central Scandinavia where vertical motion is dominated by GIA due to past glaciations. The predicted gravity signal is generally less well-constrained than the vertical signal, in part due to uncertainties associated with the correction for contemporary ice mass loss in Svalbard and the Russian Arctic. The GRACE-derived gravity trend is corrected for present-day ice mass loss using estimates derived from the ICESat and CryoSat missions, although a difference in magnitude between GRACE-inferred and altimetry-inferred regional mass loss rates suggests the possibility of a non-negligible GIA response here either from millennial-scale or Little Ice Age GIA.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Simon ◽  
Riccardo E. M. Riva ◽  
Marcel Kleinherenbrink ◽  
Thomas Frederikse

Abstract. The long-term glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) signal at present-day is constrained via joint inversion of GPS vertical land motion rates and GRACE gravity data for a region encompassing Scandinavia, northern Europe and the British Isles, and the Barents Sea. The best-fit model for the vertical motion signal has a χ2 value of approximately 1 and a maximum posterior uncertainty of 0.3–0.4 mm/yr. An elastic correction is applied to the vertical land motion rates that accounts for present-day changes to terrestrial hydrology as well as recent mass changes of ice sheets and glaciered regions. Throughout the study area, mass losses from Greenland dominate the elastic vertical signal and combine to give an elastic correction of up to +0.5 mm/yr in central Scandinavia. Neglecting to use an elastic correction may thus introduce a small but persistent bias in model predictions of GIA vertical motion even in central Scandinavia where vertical motion is dominated by long-term GIA. The predicted gravity signal is generally less well-constrained than the vertical signal, in part due to uncertainties associated with the correction for contemporary ice mass loss in Svalbard and the Russian Arctic. The GRACE-derived gravity trend is corrected for present-day ice mass loss using estimates derived from the ICESat and CryoSat missions, although a difference in magnitude between GRACE-inferred and altimetry-inferred regional mass loss rates suggests the possibility of a non-negligible GIA response here either from millennial-scale or Little Ice Age GIA.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Simon ◽  
Riccardo Riva

<p>In this study, we focus on better constraint of the long term glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) signal at present-day, and its role as a contributor to total present-day rates of change. The main study area extends from the coastal regions of northern Europe to Scandinavia. Both Holocene relative sea level (RSL) data as well as vertical land motion (VLM) data are incorporated as constraints in a semi-empirical GIA model. Specifically, 70 geological rates of GIA-driven RSL change are inferred from Holocene data; peak RSL fall is indicated in central Scandinavia and the northern British Isles where past ice sheets were thickest, RSL rise is indicated in the southern British Isles and along the northern European coastline. Rates of vertical land motion from GPS at 108 sites provide an additional measure of regional GIA deformation. Within the study area, the geological RSL data complement the spatial gaps of the VLM data and vice versa; both datasets are inverted in a semi-empirical GIA model to yield updated estimates of regional present-day GIA deformations. A regional validation is presented for the North Sea, where the GIA signal may be complicated by lateral variations in Earth structure and existing predictions of regional and global GIA models are discrepant. The model validation in the North Sea region indicates that geological data are needed to fit independent estimates of GIA-related RSL change inferred from tide gauge rates, suggesting that the geological rates provide an important additional constraint of present-day GIA.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makan A. Karegar ◽  
Simon E. Engelhart ◽  
Jürgen Kusche ◽  
Glenn A. Milne ◽  
Sarah L. Bradley

<p><em>Karegar et al</em>. (<em>2016</em>, <em>GRL</em>) showed that independent estimates of vertical land motion from geodetic and geologic techniques are critical for understanding coastal surface motion caused by geological versus human-induced processes along the Atlantic coast of North America. Motivated by these results, <span>w</span>e extend our analysis to the British Isles where good quality and spatially dense constraints are available from a continuous G<span>NSS</span> network and a state-of-the-art Holocene sea-level database. Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) along the Atlantic coast of North America causes the land surface to sink (up to -1.5 <em>mm/yr</em>), exacerbating tidal-induced flooding effects of sea-level rise. The British Isles are also subjected to proglacial forebulge collapse associated with the GIA response to the ancient Fennoscandian and British-Irish Ice Sheets. Here, we present an up-to-date and precise analysis based on continuous GNSS (combined GPS and GlONASS observations) and geologic records of late Holocene sea-level change to examine residuals between rates on these different timescales to determine if there is a significant residual and, if so, the processes responsible for the rate change.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 211 (3) ◽  
pp. 1534-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Sasgen ◽  
Alba Martín-Español ◽  
Alexander Horvath ◽  
Volker Klemann ◽  
Elizabeth J Petrie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julia Stockamp ◽  
Paul Bishop ◽  
Zhenhong Li ◽  
Elizabeth J Petrie ◽  
Jim Hansom ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTUnderstanding the effects of glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) of the British Isles is essential for the assessment of past and future sea-level trends. GIA has been extensively examined in the literature, employing different research methods and observational data types. Geological evidence from palaeo-shorelines and undisturbed sedimentary deposits has been used to reconstruct long-term relative sea-level change since the Last Glacial Maximum. This information derived from sea-level index points has been employed to inform empirical isobase models of the uplift in Scotland using trend surface and Gaussian trend surface analysis, as well as to calibrate more theory-driven GIA models that rely on Earth mantle rheology and ice sheet history. Furthermore, current short-term rates of GIA-induced crustal motion during the past few decades have been measured using different geodetic techniques, mainly continuous GPS (CGPS) and absolute gravimetry (AG). AG-measurements are generally employed to increase the accuracy of the CGPS estimates. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry (InSAR) looks promising as a relatively new technique to measure crustal uplift in the northern parts of Great Britain, where the GIA-induced vertical land deformation has its highest rate. This literature review provides an in-depth comparison and discussion of the development of these different research approaches.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Sasgen ◽  
Alba Martín-Español ◽  
Alexander Horvath ◽  
Volker Klemann ◽  
Elizabeth J. Petrie ◽  
...  

Abstract. A major uncertainty in determining the mass balance of the Antarctic ice sheet from measurements of satellite gravimetry, and to a lesser extent satellite altimetry, is the poorly known correction for the ongoing deformation of the solid Earth caused by glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). In the past decade, much progress has been made in consistently modelling the ice sheet and solid Earth interactions; however, forward-modelling solutions of GIA in Antarctica remain uncertain due to the sparsity of constraints on the ice sheet evolution, as well as the Earth's rheological properties. An alternative approach towards estimating GIA is the joint inversion of multiple satellite data – namely, satellite gravimetry, satellite altimetry and GPS, which reflect, with different sensitivities, trends of recent glacial changes and GIA. Crucial to the success of this approach is the accuracy of the space-geodetic data sets. Here, we present reprocessed rates of surface-ice elevation change (Envisat/ICESat; 2003–2009), gravity field change (GRACE; 2003–2009) and bedrock uplift (GPS; 1995–2013.7). The data analysis is complemented by the forward-modelling of viscoelastic response functions to disc load forcing, allowing us to relate GIA-induced surface displacements with gravity changes for different rheological parameters of the solid Earth. The data and modelling results presented here are available in the Pangea archive; https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.875745. The data sets are the input streams for the joint inversion estimate of present-day ice-mass change and GIA, focusing on Antarctica. However, the methods, code and data provided in this paper are applicable to solve other problems, such as volume balances of the Antarctic ice sheet, or to other geographical regions, in the case of the viscoelastic response functions. This paper presents the first of two contributions summarizing the work carried out within a European Space Agency funded study, REGINA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. L. Bradley ◽  
G. A. Milne ◽  
F. N. Teferle ◽  
R. M. Bingley ◽  
E. J. Orliac

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document