Tax Incentive Analysis to Encourage Venture Capital Investing in Digital Start-up Companies

Author(s):  
Yosephine Uliarta ◽  
Milla Sepliana Setyowati
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-250
Author(s):  
Mateusz Codogni
Keyword(s):  

Celem artykułu jest analiza specyfiki finansowania przedsięwzięć gospodarczych typu start-up. Punktem wyjścia analizy jest określenie jej zakresu poprzez zdefiniowanie przedsięwzięcia typu start-up. Następnie podjęto próbę określenia specyfiki inwestowania w przedsiębiorstwa na wczesnych etapach rozwoju z punktu widzenia kształtowania się ryzyka i potrzeb inwestycyjnych w czasie. Artykuł zawiera również przegląd współczesnych trendów w finansowaniu typu venture capital w Polsce, Europie i USA. Artykuł zamyka podsumowanie zawierające wnioski końcowe i określające kierunki dalszych badań.


Author(s):  
Andrew Coats ◽  
Louise Shewan

<p>A new journal has been launched by Barcaray Publishing: Journal of Advanced Therapies and Medical Innovation Sciences (J.ATAMIS, www.j-atamis.org).  This journal fills a crucial gap in the literature – and in the cycle of advances in medical science, therapeutics and devices - covering the pipeline from idea through proof of concept studies and start-up funding to regulatory approval.  It will be multi-disciplinary and unusually we will have significant input from funders - both angel and venture capital-, start-up CEO’s, and regulators as well as medical scientists and triallists.  We have quite frankly a stellar editorial board, with leading lights of biotechnology, medical devices, new and established pharma as well as the “other side”, CEO’s and investors.  </p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Simon Zaby

This paper aims to investigate success factors of innovative start-up firms from the perspective of young start-up managers. Which key factors did they experience before and since the foundation of their company? The experience from the quite young Swiss start-up scene pro-vides important insights to entrepreneurs and policy-makers in emerging countries that cur-rently face the necessity of building up a start-up environment. One part of the data has been collected by the author, the other part originates from the Swiss Venture Capital Database (total sample size: 306). The results show a significant role of venture capital financing for the success of innovative start-ups. Interestingly, this is to some extent because the start-ups see various additional benefits from venture capitalists involved in their firm. Thus, the findings shed new light on a proper definition of venture capital that should not solely focus on the flow of funds.


Author(s):  
Dan Breznitz

“But,” some readers might say, “look at Israel, look at San Diego—it is still feasible to become a Silicon-Hyphen.” To which this chapter answers: “And would it be a good idea if it is?” The chapter opens the mind of the reader to new ways of thinking about innovation and growth. Providing a frontal attack on the start-up religion and its most important commandment: using venture capital (VC) as a basis for growth. VCs have attained the paradigmatic status of a “must-have,” institution, when in fact they are just one, not very successful, solution to solving the question of how to finance innovation. The chapter does it by explaining how VCs really work and make money (and for whom), where and when they are successful (rarely and only in ICT and biotech), what does that means to the companies they finance, who is allowed to be part of this party, and what are the impacts on communities in places where the VCs are successful (inequality levels last seen in the Gilded Age). It utilizes research on Israel and Silicon Valley to drive those points home. At the end of the chapter the reader should realize that, YES, they want innovation-based growth, but NO, even if they could make it happen, the last thing they want for their community is to become a Silicon-Valley/Israel look-alike.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Portmann ◽  
Chipo Mlambo

This paper investigates the manner in which private equity and venture capital firms in South Africa assess investment opportunities. The analysis was facilitated using a survey containing both Likert-scale and open-ended questions. The key findings show that both private equity and venture capital firms rate the entrepreneur or management team higher than any other criterion or consideration. Private equity firms, however, emphasise financial criteria more than venture capitalists do. There is also an observable shift in the investment activities away from start-up funding, towards later-stage deals. Risk appetite has also declined post the financial crisis.


Author(s):  
Sarita Mishra ◽  
Dinabandhu Bag

Indian economy witnessed high inflow of capital for start-ups in current fiscal year through venture capital (VC) investment. From different Indian VC deals, it is evident that VC investors prefer to invest jointly. In other words, joint investment or co-investment or syndication is a common trend in Indian VC industry. VCs adopt this strategy to minimise their future uncertainties as a part of the control mechanism. In this study, an attempt is made to find out different determinants of this syndication strategy. The samples taken in this study are retrieved from Venture Intelligence database for the period 2005–2014. The data are analysed through linear regression and binomial logistic regression. Two empirical models have been developed. The derived models validate different control variables and deal with specific characteristics to comprehend the rationale of syndication mechanism. The findings of the study indicate that the past experience and the number of industry exposure of a VC in IT and ITES industry are the major predictors for a syndication decision. Subsequently, the precautionary investment attributes like number of investment round, stage funding, etc. draw the interest of potential co-investors in a syndicated deal. Syndication mechanism benefits the VC investors through sharing of risk of investment in a start-up and preparing them for a successful exit. Extant literature supports the results as Indian VC investors prefer to share the risk profile of a start-up business and adopt different risk diversion mechanisms to attract co-investors in the deal. Furthermore, the joint investment by investors drag more funding amount and also create more human capital for efficient management of the investment in VC-backed portfolio.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document