An Economic Analysis of the Use of Selective Distribution by Luxury Goods Suppliers

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Buettner ◽  
Andrea Coscelli ◽  
Thibaud Vergé ◽  
Ralph A Winter
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26
Author(s):  
Yves Botteman ◽  
Daniel Barrio Barrio

An area of uncertainty, and with differences of approach between competition authorities, is whether brand owners can prevent distributors from reselling their products via online marketplaces such as Amazon. This article considers the European Court of Justice's judgment in Coty and its implications for distribution arrangements, as regards both the application of Article 101 TFEU and the Vertical Restraints Block Exemption Regulation to selective distribution arrangements and restrictions on internet sales via third-party platforms. It also considers the European Commission's response to the Coty judgment (including its application to non-luxury goods) and the approach taken by national courts and competition authorities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 998-1007
Author(s):  
Egon Engin-Deniz

Abstract This article addresses the balance between free competition and protecting the trade mark proprietor’s interests in the context of selective distribution systems for luxury goods and the right to oppose further commercialisation. Within this framework, the author suggests a flexible system concerning the legitimate reasons for such an opposition, especially regarding luxury goods in the consumer product sector. In particular, the author looks at whether distributors of parallel imported goods – often referred to as ‘grey market traders’ – should take into consideration the limitations and conditions for the distribution of goods in the European Economic Area that are imposed on contractually bound distributors by luxury brand owners, depending on the applied distribution method, the advertising and the quality of goods. The idea of an entitlement of the brand owner to oppose matters of further commercialisation of exhausted goods if the reseller does not comply with obligations which the trade mark proprietor imposes on members of his own selective distribution system regarding specific modalities of sale is also discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
pp. 241-284
Author(s):  
Patrycja Szot ◽  
Ana Amza

This article discusses the framework of selective distribution agreements within EU competition law following the Coty Germany case and the EU Commission’s 2017 E-commerce report. It argues that the judgment removed, in essence, the limitation of sales via online platforms from the ‘by object box’. In respect of luxury goods, the ban is considered not to infringe competition law at all. In this context, the article addresses one of the judgment’s key points: what constitutes a ‘luxury good’ and evaluates to what an extent this definition can be practically applied. The authors also embark on the conditions under which the restriction is considered proportionate (when applied to non-luxury goods) and point to the risk of divergent interpretations of platform bans across member states. To illustrate the latter, several examples are given from national case-law. The considerations are completed with a brief look at problematic restrictions on the use of price comparison tools.


2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 613-621
Author(s):  
Thomas Buettner ◽  
Andrea Coscelli ◽  
Thibaud Vergé ◽  
Ralph A Winter

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document