scholarly journals Subjective side of the crime of creating or leading a criminal organization

2021 ◽  
pp. 118-127
Author(s):  
Andrei Cazacicov ◽  

The application in the national judicial practice of the criminal norm established at art. 284 Penal code encounters some difficulties resulting from the misinterpretation of the corresponding elements and signs of crime composition. The present study aimed to explain in detail and intelligibly the content of the subjective side of the crime of creating or leading a criminal organization, what will be useful from both perspectives: theoretical and practical. The coherent explanation of the content of the subjective side of the crime of creating or leading a criminal organization provides additional possibilities in the qualification process, which can be used contradictory by both participants in the criminal trial: the prosecution and the defense.

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Anna Korpysz

<p>The gloss was devoted to the problem of the subjective side of the crime of misappropriation and assessment of criminal law refusal to return the subject of the lease after the expiry of the lease agreement and cessation of payment of the leasing installments. The Court of Appeal in Warsaw took the position that the intention to keep things for themselves under Article 284 § 2 of the Penal Code is evidenced by the fact that the accused did not contact the lessor for more than two years, unlawfully using the car as his own. The author thoroughly analyzes the applicable legal provisions, not only in the field of criminal law, but also civil law, indicating what criteria should be taken into account in assigning the perpetrator of the intention <em>animus rem sibi habendi</em>. Due to the frequency of similar facts to the underlying judgement, it deserves special attention.</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 32-43
Author(s):  
Valentin Chirita ◽  
◽  
◽  

The delimitation of this offense from other similar components is of special importance in order to perform a correct deed qualification according to article No. 280 of the Penal Code of RM. The analysis of the problem in question has a great significance for both theory and judicial practice. The delimitation of the hostage-taking from other similar offenses is to be performed on the basis of the objective and subjective signs by which the respective components differ. The offense provided in art. 280 of the Penal Code of the RM is connected with a series of misdemeanors, which threaten, first of all, the freedom of a person, the transport security, as well as patrimonial relations. This type of offense refers to: blackmail (art. 189 of the Penal Code of RM), kidnapping of a person (art. 164 of the Penal Code of RM), illegal deprivation of liberty (art. 166 of the Penal Code of RM), hijacking or capture of a train, an aircraft, maritime or fluvial ship (art. 275 CP) etc.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-38
Author(s):  
Ariadna H. Ochnio

The Polish Parliament deliberately omitted the possibility of property confiscation from the Penal Code of 1997 due to negative historical experiences. However, pursuant to this Code, a court may order the forfeiture of the objects, tools and proceeds of crime or their equivalent. Under Polish law, rulings governing extended forfeiture are facilitated by a number of rebuttable legal presumptions. Against the background of Poland’s legal and historic conditions, this article explores the possible problems faced when amending criminal law in line with Directive 2014/42/eu on the freezing and confiscation of the instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the eu. The author explains the reasons for Polish sensitivities towards providing appropriate guarantees of criminal proceedings when discussing how to re-introduce confiscation into national law. The challenge is to overcome the national legal tradition of confiscation without reducing the guarantees of a fair criminal trial.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-57
Author(s):  
Damian Szczepaniak

The Penal Provisions of the Polish Copyright Law of 1926 in Legislative Works and Judicial Practice: Overprint – Plagiarism – the Subjective Side – Penal Sanctions This paper is the result of the continuation of ongoing studies on the penal provisions of the Polish Copyright Law of 1926. Some of the research results were presented in the article titled The Penal Provisions of the Polish Copyright Law of 1926. The History of Its Creation –Its General Characteristics –Art. 61 and Its Significance for Further Regulations, which was published in “Cracow Studies of Constitutional and Legal History”(2018, issue 4). This text is a presentation of the analysis of special provisions regulating penal liability for the offences of overprint and plagiarism. Further in the article, the notion of the subjective side is discussed in relation to the offences defined in the Polish Copyright Law of 1926 and also the penal sanctions provided for these offences. In the analysis of the specific problems, emphasis is placed on the course of works on the regulations conducted by the Codification Commission and by the Parliament as well as on the issues related to their application. This approach makes it possible to reconstruct the fundamental legal problems faced by the codifiers and subsequently by the system of justice applying the relevant regulations. The studies concerning the application of copyright law were mainly focused on the judicial practice of the District Court in Kraków. They were based on the court registers and records from the interwar period stored in the National Archives in Kraków. The archival research discovered that the cases concerning the infringement of copyright constituted barely 0.09% of all criminal cases lodged with the District Court in Kraków in the 1930s. In that period, only five persons were definitely sentenced in this respect. Even though there were few criminal cases concerning copyright infringement in the times of the Second Polish Republic, the rulings issued, especially those issued by the Supreme Court, undoubtedly influenced the formation of jurisprudence regarding the interpretation of copyright, and they continue to be cited in pertinent literature up to this day.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 463-472
Author(s):  
Cezariusz SOŃTA ◽  
Joanna BRYLAK

In security sciences organized crime starts to be treated as an asymmetric hazard. Organized crime covers, in the opinion of the Authors, all crimes committed within the criminal structures that are characterized by organization. Mafia is, on the one hand, a proper name for a Sicillian criminal organization, which has been used in the sense at least since the 19th century. On the other hand, it also means any criminal organization of mafia nature. In the Polish law, like in most legislations, the notion of mafia is not present. The authors try, however, to create its non-legal definition. They draw attention to the fact that the Penal Code of the Republic of Italy contains an original solution - apart from an “ordinary” criminal association (Article 416) it introduces penality for participation in an association of mafia nature (Article 416 bis). The primary purpose of this study is to analyse this structure in comparison to the origin and solution of the Italian antimafia law.


Author(s):  
Михаил Кармановский ◽  
Mikhail Karmanovsky ◽  
Елена Косьяненко ◽  
Elena Kosyanenko

Article is devoted to the changes made to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation by the Federal law of the Russian Federation of April 1, 2019 № 46-FZ on toughening of punishment for establishing a criminal organization or participation in it. Innovations concerned all parts of article 210, in particular criminal liability amplified (generally a penalty) and part 11 of article 210 appeared. Besides, the law entered new article 210.1 of the «Occupation of the highest situation in criminal hierarchy». Having analyzed statistics, only one fact of involvement of such person to criminal liability for establishing a criminal organization is elicited. Him was «thief in law» who carried out organizational and administrative functions concerning criminal community and its participants. One example of judicial practice by part 4 of article 210 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation «the person taking the highest position in criminal hierarchy», proves existence of difficulties at procedural proof. However these problems will not arise in the situation provided by article 210.1 as to prove that such person makes act it is not necessary. There is enough of fact that this person holds the highest position in criminal hierarchy. Meanwhile, noted edition of the law contradicts the theory of criminal law, regarding criminal prosecution only for criminal action.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (16) ◽  
pp. 243-260
Author(s):  
Tetiana Mykolaivna Hud

The article considers the current problems that arise during the qualification "Concealment of a crime" (Article 397 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), in particular on the basis of the subjective side. The problem of the correct qualification of a criminal offense depends on the correct establishment of all the features of the criminal offense, among which the greatest complexity are the features of the subjective side. To do this, it is necessary to disclose the content and characteristics of the subjective side, its mandatory features, and to determine the significance of the characteristics of the subjective side of the crime for the criminal assessment of the offense. The subjective side is a mandatory element of any criminal offense. Among its features are guilt, motive and purpose of the criminal offense. The analysis of judicial practice, scientific works gives the chance to develop scientific knowledge concerning the outlined question and to draw the following conclusions. The subjective side of concealment of a crime (Article 396 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) is characterized by guilt exclusively in the form of direct intent. The qualification of concealment of a crime can be significantly affected by a person's legal or factual error. Motive and purpose are optional features of the composition of concealment of the crime, they do not affect the qualification of the perpetrator, but must be considered by the court in sentencing. At the same time, the selfish motive of concealment of a crime has a great social danger, but fixing it in the tort under investigation is considered inexpedient, as it may complicate the distinction between concealment of a crime committed for selfish motives and acquisition, receipt, storage or sale of criminally obtained property. The significance of the subjective side and its features for qualification is determined. The paper reveals the features of subjective signs of concealment of a crime on the basis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Examples from judicial practice are analyzed.


Introduction. The article provides a criminal law characteristic of violence as a category of the General Part of the legislation on criminal responsibility. In particular, its role and significance in cases of application of the rule that determines the responsibility of persons who perform a special task to prevent or detect criminally illegal activities of organized groups and criminal organizations is considered. It is accentuated that violence in this norm, as well as in other norms that provide for circumstances that exclude criminal unlawfulness of the action, has the following meaning: characterizes the factual and legal basis of circumstances that exclude criminal unlawfulness; determines the use of violence against a person as grounds for "unlimited" use of force for protection; establishes that in some cases, excessive use of force leads to criminal prosecution. Summary of the main research results. The analysis of the current criminal legislation of Ukraine allowed the author to conclude that severe and especially severe consequences prescribed in Part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine characterized not only by physical damage, but also its other types, for example, by property, organizational and so on. In addition, the legislation does not clearly dividing the consequences to severe and particularly severe. In most cases, they coincide, and in practice there are difficulties in delimitation them. To solve this problem, it is proposed to specify the consequences of exceeding the limits by a person performing a special task. This can only be the most dangerous harm to a person, which is to take his life (murder) and inflict grievous bodily harm. The meaning of the term "compulsion" in the corresponding norm is investigated. According to the author, compulsion is an element of the objective side of criminal offenses committed during the performance of a special task, namely the circumstance of the commission of such offenses. These are the specific objective-presentive conditions in which a criminal offense is committed. In fact, the compulsion of harm causing during a special task is due to two factors: the final goal that characterizes a person's behavior - prevention or detection of criminally illegal activity of an organized group or criminal organization and the situation in which the person operates. The article states that an important characteristic of illegal behavior, namely its subjective side, is the motives and purpose of a person's actions. The closest (immediate) goal is to avoid detecting, to ensure the security of their stay in an organized criminal group or criminal organization. The final goal is to prevent and detect criminally illegal activity of an organized group or criminal organization. The article considers the concepts of "detection of criminal offenses" and "prevention of criminal offenses". On the basis of researches of modern works which are devoted to the given subject the author's definitions of these terms are given. It is also given the author's wording of part 2 of Art. 43 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which determines the conditions of criminal responsibility of persons performing a special task. Conclusions. The article makes scientifically substantiated conclusions and provides author's recommendations for improving the current legislation on criminal responsibility, in particular, clearly defines exceeding the limits in this circumstance, which can only be murder or grievous bodily harm; the author's definition of the concept "disclosure of criminally illegal activity" is given; indicated that in criminal offenses committed by persons performing a special task, motive and purpose are mandatory features of the subjective side.


1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-36
Author(s):  
Mehedi Imam

In Bangladesh, demand for judicial independence in practice has been a much debated issue and the demand is fulfilled but expectation of people is not only limited to have an independent judiciary but to have an impartial system and cadre of people, which will administer justice rationally being free from fear or force. The independence of judiciary and the impartial judicial practice are related concepts, one cannot sustain without the other and here existence as well as the need of practicing impartiality is well recognized. But the art of practicing impartiality does not develop overnight as it’s related to development of one’s attitude. It takes a considerable time resulting from understanding, appreciating and acknowledging the moral values, ethics and professional responsibility. The judiciary includes Judges, Advocates mostly who are expected to demonstrate a high level of moral values and impartiality towards people seeking justice and ‘rule of law’. This is true that bench officers and clerks are also part of the process to ensure rule of law with same level of participation by the law enforcing agencies such as police. However the paper includes only those who either join judiciary as Judge/Magistrate or Advocate to explore level and extent of ethical knowledge they receive being key role players of the system. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v1i2.9628 Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 2010; 1(2): 34-36


2002 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Duff

On 1 April 1996, a rather odd provision was introduced into the Scottish criminal justice process, namely a duty on both prosecution and defence to try to agree uncontroversial evidence in advance of criminal trial.1 As far as the writer is aware, such a provision is unique, although the philosophy underlying its introduction is not totally alien to inquisitorial systems of criminal justice.2 What is particularly peculiar about this duty is that there is no sanction for a failure, however unreasonable, to agree uncontroversial evidence.3 The lack of a sanction resulted from a concern that the creation of any penalty would impinge unjustifiably upon the rights of the accused. The intention in this article is to explore in detail the relationship between the duty to agree uncontroversial evidence and the position of the accused, and to suggest that the imposition of a sanction for a breach of this duty is not as problematic as was thought by those responsible for the legislation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document