scholarly journals Case Report: Post Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis with History of Visceral Leishmaniasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 69-72
Author(s):  
Pavankumar Narapaka ◽  
Kalpana Katikala

The complication of visceral leishmaniasis is post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL). PKDL typically occurs as a result of treatment failure or parasite resistance to treatment regimens, as well as poor patient follow-up. In the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis and post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, Liposomal Amphotericin B is considering as first-line therapy. We're going to show you a case where Liposomal Amphotericin B was used to treat it. Keywords: visceral leishmaniasis, post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis, PKDL, kala-azar

2019 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. 608-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Ramesh ◽  
Keerti Kaumudee Dixit ◽  
Neha Sharma ◽  
Ruchi Singh ◽  
Poonam Salotra

Abstract Background No satisfactory canonical treatment is available for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL), clinical sequela of visceral leishmaniasis. Confined treatment options and substantial increase in relapse rate after miltefosine (MIL) treatment warrant the need to adapt resilient combination therapies. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of combination therapy using liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and MIL for treating PKDL. Methods Thirty-two PKDL patients, confirmed by microscopy or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), were included in the study. An equal number of cases (n = 16) were put on MIL monotherapy (100 mg/day for 90 days) or MIL and LAmB combination for 45 days (3 injections of LAmB, 5 mg/kg body weight, and 100 mg/day MIL). Parasite load in slit aspirate was monitored using qPCR. Results Patients treated with combination therapy demonstrated a rapid decline in parasite load and achieved 100% cure, with no reports of relapse. Those treated with MIL monotherapy attained clinical cure with a gradual decrease in parasite load; however, 25% relapsed within 18 months of follow-up. Conclusions Liposomal amphotericin B and MIL combination for treating PKDL is efficacious and safe, with high tolerability. Furthermore, this study established the utility of minimally invasive slit aspirate method for monitoring of parasite load and assessment of cure in PKDL.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5559-5559
Author(s):  
Jindrinska Hybnerova ◽  
Amit Bahn ◽  
Christopher Pocock

Abstract Background: In most centres in the United Kingdom, systemic antifungal therapy (AFT) is used as third-line therapy for fever complicating profound, prolonged neutropenia (PPN) during the treatment of acute leukemia. Voriconazole has been recommended as first-line AFT at the Kent and Canterbury Hospital (KCH) since October 2002; liposomal amphotericin B was the previous treatment of choice. The aim of the audit was to identify numbers of episodes of PPN and the numbers of suspected fungal infections in a 2-year period following the policy change. Subsequently the clinical and financial outcomes were examined. In addition, the impact on cost of AFT following centralisation of leukemia treatment from two district hospitals onto one site was examined. Methods: A retrospective audit was conducted on data from hematology inpatients undergoing remission induction or consolidation therapy for acute leukemia at KCH between January 2003 and December 2004. The costs of voriconazole and liposomal amphotericin B treatment from 2002 to 2004, and 8 months prior and post centralisation of inpatient care (April 2004, which increased the population from 400,000 to 600,000), were examined. Results: 84 episodes of PPN were identified in 41 patients undergoing treatment for acute leukemia; mostly acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Itraconazole prophylaxis from d1 of therapy and GCSF from d+5 was used in the majority of cases. 18 cases of suspected or radiologically proven fungal infection were identified. High-resolution computed tomography of the chest was performed in 10 cases and suspicious lesions identified in three. Voriconazole was used as first-line therapy in 17/18 cases. In 7 cases, treatment was switched to liposomal amphotericin B. Reasons for switching were rising C-reactive protein (1 patient), persistent fever (2 patients), radiological progression (1 patient) and side effects (3 patients). Of the 3 patients with radiological evidence of fungal infection, two had a complete resolution (1 voriconazole, 1 voriconazole/liposomal amphotericin B) and 1 patient died of refractory leukemia. There was a fall in total antifungal spend from £263K in 2002/3 to £229K in 2003 and a further 68% fall to £73K in 2004. We suspect this was due to increasing adherence to the new antifungal protocol and to improved practices following centralisation: in the 8 months pre-centralisation the antifungal spend across all hospitals was £102K falling by 74% to £26K in the 8 months on the single site. Conclusion: Since introducing voriconazole as first-line AFT, centralising inpatient services, and adopting common policies for antimicrobial prophylaxis, there has been considerable financial benefit with no increase in morbidity and/or mortality.


1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
S C Karande ◽  
K F John Boby ◽  
K R Lahiri ◽  
M K Jain ◽  
N A Kshirsagar ◽  
...  

Visceral leishmaniasis continues to be a major health problem in Bihar and West Bengal states of India. In Bihar almost 44 million people in 28 districts and in West Bengal 5.5 million people in eight districts are at risk of visceral leishmaniasis1. Pentavalent antimonial (Sbv) compounds are the first-line drugs, and amphotericin B is used when failure to respond to antimony occurs2. We report the case of a 7-year-old boy with advanced antimony-resistant visceral leishmaniasis who was successfully treated by liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmpB-LRC) manufactured in our institute. This case report documents the efficacy of L-AmpB-LRC in such a patient and highlights the need for a longer duration of treatment.


Author(s):  
Domingos Sousa ◽  
Miguel Seruca ◽  
Ana Isabel Rodrigues ◽  
Mourão Carvalho ◽  
Sara Aleixo Duarte ◽  
...  

A 26-year-old patient was admitted with a 6-month history of fever,fatigue,and unintentional weight loss.Abdominal CT described an heterogeneous hepatosplenomegaly.Laboratory studies revealed leucopenia,anemia and elevated CRP.Bone marrow aspirate revealed amastigotes compatible with Leishmania spp.Was treated with liposomal amphotericin B with favourable outcome.Authors intend to raise awareness of VL in immunocompetentpatients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Krishna Pandey ◽  
Biplab Pal ◽  
Niyamat Ali Siddiqui ◽  
Chandra Shekhar Lal ◽  
Vahab Ali ◽  
...  

Background: Treatment of post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis cases is of paramount importance for kala-azar elimination; however, limited treatment regimens are available as of now. Aim: To compare the effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B vs miltefosine in post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis patients. Methodology: This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group study. A total of 100 patients of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis, aged between 5 and 65 years were recruited, 50 patients in each group A (liposomal amphotericin B) and B (miltefosine). Patients were randomized to receive either liposomal amphotericin B (30 mg/kg), six doses each 5 mg/kg, biweekly for 3 weeks or miltefosine 2.5 mg/kg or 100 mg/day for 12 weeks. All the patients were followed at 3rd, 6th and 12th months after the end of the treatment. Results: In the liposomal amphotericin B group, two patients were lost to follow-up, whereas four patients were lost to follow-up in the miltefosine group. The initial cure rate by “intention to treat analysis” was 98% and 100% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine group, respectively. The final cure rate by “per protocol analysis” was 74.5% and 86.9% in liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, respectively. Twelve patients (25.5%) in the liposomal amphotericin B group and six patients (13%) in the miltefosine group relapsed. None of the patients in either group developed any serious adverse events. Limitations: Quantitative polymerase chain reaction was not performed at all the follow-up visits and sample sizes. Conclusion: Efficacy of miltefosine was found to be better than liposomal amphotericin B, hence, the use of miltefosine as first-line therapy for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis needs to be continued. However, liposomal amphotericin B could be considered as one of the treatment options for the elimination of kala-azar from the Indian subcontinent.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e2611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sakib Burza ◽  
Prabhat Kumar Sinha ◽  
Raman Mahajan ◽  
Marta González Sanz ◽  
María Angeles Lima ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Srija Moulik ◽  
Ritika Sengupta ◽  
Manab Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Nilay Kanti Das ◽  
Bibhuti Saha ◽  
...  

Background: Post kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) is thought to be the reservoir of infection for visceral leishmaniasis in South Asia. The development of strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of PKDL are important for the implementation of the visceral leishmaniasis elimination program. Aims: Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) has been an overwhelming success in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. However, the empirical three-week regimen of L-AMB proposed for PKDL was shown to be inadequate, especially in the macular variant. This study aimed to delineate response of the different variants of PKDL to L-AMB. Methods: Skin biopsies were collected from PKDL cases at disease presentation and upon completion of treatment with L-AMB. Parasite DNA was detected by Internal Transcribed Spacer-1 PCR (ITS-1 PCR) and quantified by amplification of parasite kDNA. CD68 + macrophages were estimated in tissue sections by immunohistochemistry. Results: Treatment with L-AMB decreased the parasite load by 97% in polymorphic cases but only by 45% in macular cases. The median parasite load (89965 vs 5445 parasites/μg of genomic DNA) as well as infiltration by CD68+ cells before treatment was much greater in the polymorphic cases. Limitations: Although monitoring of the parasite load for 12 months post-treatment would have been ideal, this was not possible owing to logistical issues as well as the invasive nature of biopsy collection procedure. Conclusion: A dramatic decrease in the parasite burden was noted in patients with polymorphic lesions. Although patients with macular disease also had a decrease in parasite burden, this was not as marked as in the polymorphic cases. There was also a significantly greater infiltration of CD68 + macrophages in polymorphic PKDL before therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document