scholarly journals Personality and injury risk among professional hockey players

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary H. Osborn ◽  
Paul D. Blanton ◽  
David C. Schwebel
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robby Sikka ◽  
Chad Kurtenbach ◽  
J. Tyler Steubs ◽  
Joel L. Boyd ◽  
Bradley J. Nelson

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
N.V. Polenova ◽  
A.D. Deev ◽  
E.N. Livantsova ◽  
Yu.R. Varaeva ◽  
S.D. Kosyura ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Kai ◽  
Kristy D. Lee ◽  
Gordon Andrews ◽  
Mike Wilkinson ◽  
Bruce B. Forster

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Silvis ◽  
Timothy J. Mosher ◽  
Brandon S. Smetana ◽  
Vernon M. Chinchilli ◽  
Donald J. Flemming ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 861-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUSSELL C. BRIGGS ◽  
PAUL H. KOLBJORNSEN ◽  
ROGERS C. SOUTHALL

1995 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. P171-P171
Author(s):  
Kendall L. Hanft ◽  
Frank C. Astor ◽  
David E. Attarian ◽  
Harry Moon

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory R. Anderson ◽  
Heath P. Melugin ◽  
Michael J. Stuart

Context: Hockey is a skillful contact sport with an elevated injury risk at higher levels of play. An understanding of injury incidence, type, mechanism, and severity at various levels of competition aids the clinician treating these athletes. The purpose of this clinical review is to discuss the epidemiology of hockey injuries at various levels of participation, including youth, high school, junior, college, and professional. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search was performed by a review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and included articles published from 1988 to 2017. Studies were included in this review if determined to be of high quality and containing injury data relevant to the levels of competition. Pertinent data regarding ice hockey injury epidemiology and prevention at various levels of competition were analyzed. Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Results: Youth, high school, junior, college, and professional hockey players have unique injury patterns. Injuries occur much more often in a game compared with a practice, and injury risk increases with each level of competition. Preventative measures, such as mandatory facial protection and delayed body checking in games until age 13 years, are proven strategies to reduce the risk of facial injury and concussion. Conclusion: An understanding of common injury types and mechanisms according to age and level of play aids the clinician in diagnosis and management. This information can also guide preventative strategies in the areas of education, coaching, rule enforcement, rule modifications, equipment improvement, and sportsmanship.


Author(s):  
Antonio Cejudo ◽  
Víctor Jesús Moreno-Alcaraz ◽  
Mark De Ste Croix ◽  
Fernando Santonja-Medina ◽  
Pilar Sainz de Baranda

During puberty, the growth of the bones is faster than that of the muscles, which may result in muscular tightness. Muscular tightness and asymmetry have been associated with an increase in injury incidence. The assessment of a joint range of motion (ROM) could help to identify athletes classified as high injury risk. The objectives of the present study were to describe the lower-extremity flexibility profile (LEFP) of youth competitive inline hockey players using the ROM-SPORT battery (I) and to identify muscular tightness and asymmetry (II). Seventy-four young players were examined for maximum passive ankle, knee, and hip ROMs. Muscle asymmetry or tightness was classified according to cutoff scores previously described. The LEFP of the 74 players was 10.8° for hip extension, 26° for hip adduction, 33.6° for ankle dorsiflexion, 38.6° for ankle dorsiflexion with knee flexed, 36.7° for hip abduction, 46° for hip internal rotation, 60.6° for hip external rotation, 65.1° for hip abduction with the hip flexed, 66.3° for hip flexion with the knee extended, 119.7° for knee flexion, and 133.7° for hip flexion. The individual analysis of the flexibility values identified tightness in all players for one or more movement, except for hip abduction. A low prevalence of asymmetries was observed (range: 5.4% to 17.6% of players) depending on the ROM.


Author(s):  
Peter Aston ◽  
Maria Filippou-Frye ◽  
Christine Blasey ◽  
Peter Johannes van Roessel ◽  
Carolyn I. Rodriguez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document