EGYPT IN THE SATRAPIC DIVISION SYSTEM OF ACHAEMENID PERSIA

Author(s):  
HOVHANNES KHORIKYAN

The Egyptian Satrapy had the first-rate importance for Achaemenid Persia. Many important and wrinkled issues on the administrative policy and historical geography of the VI Satrapy were examined in the article, the elucidation of which has an important meaning for studying the history of Achaemenid Persia. Analysis of informations received from Herodotus and other ancient sources shows that Egypt had great economic and military importance to Persian Court. Тhe VI Satrapy was divided into four subdistricts: Egypt, Libya, Cyrene and Barca.

Author(s):  
HOVHANNES KHORIKYAN

Many important and wrinkled issues on the administrative policy and historical geography of X Satrapy were examined in the article, the elucidation of which has an important meaning for studying the history of Achaemenid Persia. The study of the ethnical structure and the territory of the Median Satrapy shows that the latter has been developed on the base of the Iranian ethnical component. Тhe X Satrapy was divided into four subdistricts: Agbatana, the rest of Media, the territories of the Paricanians and Orthocorybantians.


Itinerario ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Maarten Manse ◽  
Sander Tetteroo ◽  
Remco Raben

Robert Cribb is in Leiden for the International Convention of Asia Scholars, held in July 2019. Despite having just arrived from Canberra, where he is professor at the Australian National University, he gladly made time for an interview over lunch. During his long career as a historian and Indonesia scholar, Cribb has traversed many different research themes, including the history of mass violence and crime, national identity, environmental politics, and historical geography of Indonesia, providing sufficient ingredients for a two-hour long conversation on the identity of scholars, students, and orangutans, bridging Europe, Australia, and Indonesia.


2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT MAYHEW

This paper extends discussions of the sociology of the early modern scientific community by paying particular attention to the geography of that community. The paper approaches the issue in terms of the scientific community's self image as a Republic of Letters. Detailed analysis of patterns of citation in two British geography books is used to map the ‘imagined community’ of geographers from the late Renaissance to the age of Enlightenment. What were the geographical origins of authors cited in geography books and how did this change over time? To what extent was scholarship from other cultural arenas integrated into European geography? Such an analysis draws on and interrogates recent work in the history of science and in the history of scholarship more broadly, work which has made important contributions to our understanding of the historical geography of scholarly communities in early modern Europe.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 452-461
Author(s):  
I. Sapozhnikov ◽  
◽  
M. Kashuba ◽  

This paper is devoted to the brief but successful collaboration in the 1860s between the Imperial Archaeo- logical Commission (IAC) and the Odessa scholar of German origin F. K. Brun (Philipp Jakob Bruun) (1804–1880). This episode is recorded in a dossier kept at the Manuscript Department of the Scientific Archives of the Institute for the History of Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The scientist was commissioned with writing the foreword to the then expected publication of “Antiquities of Herodotus’ Scythia”. He prepared the work basing on materials from two trips across the region: it was published in 1872 in the form of an appendix with supplements about the description of Darius’ campaign against the Scythians and a map of Herodotus’ Scythia. The article publishes a report by F. K. Brun on the surveys of 1864– 1865 in the Northern Black Sea region and his propositions of 1869 to IAC concerning the expansion of researches to the entire littoral of the Black Sea. The facts presented show F. K. Brun as an expert on historical geography and an archaeologist.


Urban History ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 58-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Vickery

Charles Dickens visited Preston in January 1854 to report on the cotton lock-out of that year. What he saw contributed to his vision of the archetypal northern, urban industrial centre, Coketown:It was a town of red brick or of brick that would have been red if the smoke and ashes had allowed it; but as matters stood it was a town of unnatural red and black like the painted face of a savage. It was a town of machinery and tall chimneys, out of which interminable serpents of smoke trailed themselves forever and ever and never got uncoiled.Three years later a rather different topographical account appeared in Charles Hardwick's history of the borough:Notwithstanding the occasional carpings of a few splenetic travellers, Preston is generally and deservedly recognized as one of the cleanest and most pleasantly situated manufacturing towns in England. The cotton factories are chiefly erected to the north and east of the old aristocratic borough …. and do not as yet materially interfere with the more ‘fashionable’ or picturesque sections of the district.The contrast illuminates the shortcomings of the town history both as literature and historical geography; but indicates the tenor of Prestonian self-justification. It is precisely this prosaic subjectivity which makes the histories a rich source. As Peter Clark asserts, ‘even fifth-rate urban historians sometimes have an important story to tell.’Unlike many other towns with long-established traditions of urban chronicling, history writing in Preston did not blossom until the nineteenth century.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document