Application of Italian Ryegrass-Rice Double Cropping Systems to Evaluate the Physicochemical Properties of Soil and Yield and Quality of Rice in Paddy Field in Southern Parts of Korea

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 659-671
Author(s):  
Seo Young Oh ◽  
Seong Hwan Oh ◽  
Jong Ho Seo ◽  
Jisu Choi
2011 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavio P. Caviglia ◽  
Victor O. Sadras ◽  
Fernando H. Andrade

1979 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Garwood ◽  
K. C. Tyson ◽  
J. Sinclair

SUMMARYThe yield and quality of herbage produced by six grasses (perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, rough-stalked meadow grass, tall fescue and Italian ryegrass) were examined both without irrigation and under two irrigation regimes. Water was applied according to the potential soil water deficit (potential SWD): the soil was either partially returned to field capacity (FC) after each cut or fully returned to FC whenever the potential SWD reached 25 mm. The swards were cut either at 3 (C3) or 6 (C6) week intervals over a 2 year period.Partial irrigation increased yields by 12–14% in the first year and by 36–58% in the second. Full irrigation produced little more growth than partial irrigation in the first year (maximum SWD, 188 mm) but increased yield by 78–93% in the second, very dry, year (maximum SWD, 311 mm). Under treatment C3 response per unit of water applied was similar with both partial and full irrigation, but under C6 the response was greater with partial (2·86 kg D.M./m3) than with full irrigation (1·79 kg D.M./m3).There were marked differences between the species in their ability to grow under drought conditions in the second year of the experiment. Without irrigation, roughstalked meadow grass and Italian ryegrass did not survive the drought. The performance of tall fescue was markedly superior to both perennial ryegrass and cocksfoot in these conditions. Of the surviving grasses timothy made least growth.


1963 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-496
Author(s):  
K. R. Stockinger ◽  
A. J. MacKenzie ◽  
E. E. Cary

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
A. Ramanjaneya Reddy ◽  
V. Munaswamy ◽  
P. Venkataram Muni Reddy ◽  
B. Ravindra Reddy ◽  
P. Sudhakar

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surendra Singh ◽  
S. K. Singh

Sulphur is the fourth most important nutrient after nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc for Indian Agriculture. Large quantities of indigenous S sources such as mined gypsum, pyrite and by-product phosphogypsum are available in the country. Research efforts have been directed to evaluate suitability of these indigenous S sources as sulphur fertilizer in soils and crops of eastern India. The magnitude of S deficiency widely differed in soils of eastern states. Among different crops oilseeds were found more responsive to S application than pulses and cereals. The dose of most of the crops ranged between 20 to 60 kg ha-1 except sugarcane which profitably responded at 80 kg ha-1. Basal soil application of gypsum and phosphogypsum were found to be superior than that of pyrites. However, pyrites resulted in higher crop response on residual sulphur in various cropping systems. In addition to yield, application of S improved the quality of crop produce also. Protein content in cereals and pulses, oil content in oil seeds and sugar content in sugarcane were appreciably increased due to S application. Replenishment of sulphur in soil can be made through the use of indigenous sources of sulphur for achieving higher crops yield and quality in eastern states of India.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Won Kim ◽  
Jong Yeob Kim ◽  
Dong Hyun You ◽  
Chang Su Kim ◽  
Hee Jun Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document