scholarly journals Design of the Initial Medication Adherence (IMA) complex intervention in Primary Care: "NonInitiators - Modelling study”

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. 182
Author(s):  
Cristina Carbonell Duacastella
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Complex Intervention ◽  
Initial Medication ◽  
Modelling Study

scholarly journals Optimal cut-off points for adherence measure among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care clinics: a retrospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204062232199026
Author(s):  
Ming Tsuey Lim ◽  
Norazida Ab Rahman ◽  
Xin Rou Teh ◽  
Chee Lee Chan ◽  
Shantini Thevendran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Poor Adherence ◽  
Adherence Measure ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Assessment Period ◽  
Hba1c Target ◽  
Optimal Adherence

Background: Medication adherence measures are often dichotomized to classify patients into those with good or poor adherence using a cut-off value ⩾80%, but this cut-off may not be universal across diseases or medication classes. This study aimed to examine the cut-off value that optimally distinguish good and poor adherence by using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) as adherence measures and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as outcome measure among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Method: We used pharmacy dispensing data of 1461 eligible T2DM patients from public primary care clinics in Malaysia treated with oral antidiabetic drugs between January 2018 and May 2019. Adherence rates were calculated during the period preceding the HbA1c measurement. Adherence cut-off values for the following conditions were compared: adherence measure (MPR versus PDC), assessment period (90-day versus 180-day), and HbA1c target (⩽7.0% versus ⩽8.0%). Results: The optimal adherence cut-offs for MPR and PDC in predicting HbA1c ⩽7.0% ranged between 86.1% and 98.3% across the two assessment periods. In predicting HbA1c ⩽8.0%, the optimal adherence cut-offs ranged from 86.1% to 92.8%. The cut-off value was notably higher with PDC as the adherence measure, shorter assessment period, and a stricter HbA1c target (⩽7.0%) as outcome. Conclusion: We found that optimal adherence cut-off appeared to be slightly higher than the conventional value of 80%. The adherence thresholds may vary depending on the length of assessment period and outcome definition but a reasonably wise cut-off to distinguish good versus poor medication adherence to be clinically meaningful should be at 90%.

scholarly journals Critical aspects of the management of stable coronary artery disease in primary care practice or how to increase the efficacy of evidence-based pharmacological therapy?

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Sergey K. Zyryanov ◽  
Sergey B. Fitilev ◽  
Alexander V. Vozzhaev ◽  
Irina I. Shkrebniova ◽  
Dmitry A. Klyuev
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction: The publication describes a fragment of the pharmacoepidemiologic study conducted to review the quality of management of patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) in primary care over a 12-year period. The aim of the study was to justify the application of standard operating procedures (SOPs). Such determinants of pharmacotherapy as non-pharmacological modification of cardiovascular risk factors (RFs) and medication adherence were analyzed. Material and methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, 3-stage (2006, 2011, 2018) study was conducted in a primary care setting of Moscow. As many as 3027, 1834, 805 patients with verified diagnosis of SCAD were included. Demographics, medical history, data on modifiable RFs and prescribed drug therapies were collected. At the third stage, medication adherence was measured, using the 8-item Morisky scale. Results and discussion: Over a 7-year period, better control of modifiable RFs in coronary patients was revealed. The target levels of blood pressure were reached in 58.3% (+20.7%; p < 0.05) of the patients, total cholesterol – in 33.0% (+16.0%; p < 0.05), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol – in 23.3% (+12.2%; p < 0.05). Two critical problems that determined still inadequate RFs control were identified. The attention of physicians to RFs and rates of non-pharmacological interventions remained low throughout the study. Information on lifestyle RFs was recorded in fewer than one-third of the subjects. The lipid profile was registered only in half of patients’ histories. Non-adherence to pharmacotherapy was identified in 51.3% of patients. Conclusion: Further increase in efficacy of pharmacotherapy might be provided by application of SOPs regarding the registration and correction of modifiable cardiovascular RFs, identification of non-adherent patients and promotion of medication adherence.

scholarly journals Deriving and validating a brief measure of treatment burden to assess person-centered healthcare quality in primary care: a multi-method study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Eton ◽  
Mark Linzer ◽  
Deborah H. Boehm ◽  
Catherine E. Vanderboom ◽  
Elizabeth A. Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Treatment Burden ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

Abstract Background In primary care there is a need for more quality measures of person-centered outcomes, especially ones applicable to patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). The aim of this study was to derive and validate a short-form version of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS), an established measure of treatment burden, to help fill the gap in quality measurement. Methods Patient interviews (30) and provider surveys (30) were used to winnow items from the PETS (60 items) to a subset targeting person-centered care quality. Results were reviewed by a panel of healthcare providers and health-services researchers who finalized a pilot version. The Brief PETS was tested in surveys of 200 clinic and 200 community-dwelling MCC patients. Surveys containing the Brief PETS and additional measures (e.g., health status, medication adherence, quality of care, demographics) were administered at baseline and follow-up. Correlations and t-tests were used to assess validity, including responsiveness to change of the Brief PETS. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated on mean differences. Results Winnowing and panel review resulted in a 34-item Brief PETS pilot measure that was tested in the combined sample of 400 (mean age = 57.9 years, 50% female, 48% white, median number of conditions = 5). Reliability of most scales was acceptable (alpha > 0.70). Brief PETS scores were associated with age, income, health status, and quality of chronic illness care at baseline (P < .05; rho magnitude range: 0.16–0.66). Furthermore, Brief PETS scores differentiated groups based on marital and education status, presence/absence of a self-management routine, and optimal/suboptimal medication adherence (P < .05; ES range: 0.25–1.00). Declines in patient-reported physical or mental health status over time were associated with worsening PETS burden scores, while improvements were associated with improving PETS burden scores (P < .05; ES range: 0.04–0.44). Among clinic patients, 91% were willing to complete the Brief PETS as part of their clinic visits. Conclusions The Brief PETS (final version: 32 items) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing person-centered care quality related to treatment burden. It holds promise as a means of giving voice to patient concerns about the complexity of disease management.

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Associated Factors among Primary Care Asian Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (19) ◽  
pp. 3561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardesh Dhillon ◽  
Rusli Bin Nordin ◽  
Amutha Ramadas
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Care Clinic

Diabetes complications, medication adherence, and psychosocial well-being have been associated with quality of life (QOL) among several Western and Asian populations with diabetes, however, there is little evidence substantiating these relationships among Malaysia’s unique and diverse population. Therefore, a cross-sectional study was conducted in a Malaysian public primary care clinic among 150 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Structured and validated questionnaires were used to investigate the associations between demographic, clinical, and psychological factors with QOL of the study participants. Approximately three-quarters of patients had a good-excellent QOL. Diabetes-related variables that were significantly associated with poor QOL scores included insulin containing treatment regimens, poor glycemic control, inactive lifestyle, retinopathy, neuropathy, abnormal psychosocial well-being, higher diabetes complication severity, and nonadherence (p < 0.05). The main predictors of a good-excellent QOL were HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (aOR = 20.78, 95% CI = 2.5175.9, p = 0.005), normal anxiety levels (aOR = 5.73, 95% CI = 1.8–18.5, p = 0.004), medication adherence (aOR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.3–8.7, p = 0.012), and an aDCSI score of one and two as compared to those greater than or equal to four (aOR = 7.78, 95% CI = 1.5–39.2, p = 0.013 and aOR = 8.23, 95% CI = 2.1–32.8, p = 0.003), respectively. Medication adherence has also been found to be an effect modifier of relationships between HbA1c, depression, anxiety, disease severity, and QOL. These predictors of QOL are important factors to consider when managing patients with T2DM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document