scholarly journals Bridging the gap: Improving patient safety through targeted in-situ simulation training in a paediatric intensive care unit and Learning from Excellence (LfE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2019 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabhakar Nayak ◽  
Nikki Kidd ◽  
Bianca Osborne-Ricketts ◽  
Jeff Martin ◽  
Yvonne Heward ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e8
Author(s):  
Kristen M. Brown ◽  
Shawna S. Mudd ◽  
Julianne S. Perretta ◽  
Adam Dodson ◽  
Elizabeth A. Hunt ◽  
...  

Background Simulation is increasingly used to identify latent threats to patient safety, such as delays in recognition and management of time-sensitive conditions. The Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice teaching method may facilitate “nano” (brief) in situ simulation training in a critical care setting to improve multidisciplinary team performance of time-sensitive clinical tasks. Objective To determine whether nano–in situ simulation training with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice can improve pediatric intensive care unit team proficiency in identifying and managing postoperative shock in a pediatric cardiac patient. Methods A quality improvement educational project was conducted involving nano–in situ simulation sessions in a combined pediatric and pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. The Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice method was used with an expert-driven checklist for 30-minute simulation scenarios. Results A total of 23 critical care providers participated. The proportion of time-sensitive tasks completed within 5 minutes increased significantly from before to after training (52% [13 of 25] vs 100% [25 of 25]; P ≤ .001). Using a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels, the participants reported high degrees of performance confidence (mean, 4.42; SD, 0.20) and satisfaction with the simulation experience (mean, 4.96; SD, 0.12). Conclusion The Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice method was used to facilitate nano–in situ simulation training and identify areas requiring additional education to improve patient safety. In situ simulation can educate providers in a cost-effective and timely manner.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e000753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Aldawood ◽  
Yasser Kazzaz ◽  
Ali AlShehri ◽  
Hamza Alali ◽  
Khaled Al-Surimi

BackgroundOpen communication between leadership and frontline staff at the unit level is vital in promoting safe hospital culture. Our hospital staff culture survey identified the failure to address safety issues as one of the areas where staff felt unable to express their concerns openly. Thus, this improvement project using the daily safety huddle tool has been developed to enhance teamwork communication and respond effectively to patient safety issues identified in a paediatric intensive care unit.MethodsWe used the TeamSTEPPS quality approach. TeamSTEPPS is an evidence-based set of teamwork tools developed by the US Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality to enhance teamwork and communication. We applied TeamSTEPPS using a tool called the Daily Safety Huddle, aiming at improving communication and interaction between healthcare workers and building trust by acting immediately when there is any patient safety issue or concern at the unit level.ResultsDuring the period from April to December 2017, the interaction between frontline staff and unit leadership increased through compliance with the daily safety huddle. Initially, compliance was at 73%, but it increased to 97%, with a total of 340 safety issues addressed. The majority of these safety issues pertained to infection control and medication errors (109; 32.05%), followed by communication (83; 24.41%), documentation (59; 17.35%), other issues (37; 10.88%), procedure (20; 5.88%), patient flow (16; 4.7%) and equipment and supplies (16; 4.7%).ConclusionsSystematic use of daily safety huddle is a powerful tool to create an equitable environment where frontline staff can speak up freely about daily patient safety concerns. The huddle leads to a more open and active discussion with unit leadership and to the ability to perform the right action at the right time.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Monroe ◽  
D. Wang ◽  
C. Vincent ◽  
M. Woloshynowych ◽  
G. Neale ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document