scholarly journals The Effect of Intraoperative Radiographs on Component Position and Leg Length during Routine Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Hip & Pelvis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Brown ◽  
James F. McDonald ◽  
Robert A. Sershon ◽  
Robert H. Hopper
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Component Position ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip

Using a ring to locate femoral head centre in total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110054
Author(s):  
Owen J Diamond ◽  
Janet C Hill ◽  
Aaron J McCann ◽  
Cormac McGrath ◽  
Richard J Napier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Circular Ring ◽  
Analysis Program ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Posterior Aspect ◽  
Total Hip

Aims: Traditional methods of determining femoral head centre (FHC) during total hip arthroplasty (THA) rely on measuring the distance from a fixed point on the femur or using a calliper. The aim of this experiment was to investigate how accurately a simple circular ring could locate FHC. Methods: 144 consecutively available femoral heads (FHs) were collected from patients undergoing THA. Each FH was orientated and mounted on a Sawbone, to create a model of its position on a proximal femur. The ring was applied to the posterior aspect of the FH and a head-centre pin (HCP) was then drilled into the FH and the ring removed, leaving the HCP in place. Each FH was then photographed normal to the axis of the HCP. A MATLAB analysis program then assessed the accuracy of the ring in locating FHC. Results: Mean location accuracy for FHC was 1.77 (range 0.07–5.83) mm with 97.2% within 4 mm and all but 1 within 5 mm. Conclusions: This ring device located FHC to within 4 mm in 97% of a series of osteoarthritic FHs. This indicates that the posterior aspect of the FH maintains its sphericity late into the osteoarthritic process. Having a simple FHC location device during THA would be of value to control leg length and offset when using the posterior approach.

scholarly journals Can robotic technology mitigate the learning curve of total hip arthroplasty?

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 365-370
Author(s):  
Nicholas Kolodychuk ◽  
Edwin Su ◽  
Michael M. Alexiades ◽  
Renee Ren ◽  
Connor Ojard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip

Aims Traditionally, acetabular component insertion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is visually assisted in the posterior approach and fluoroscopically assisted in the anterior approach. The present study examined the accuracy of a new surgeon during anterior (NSA) and posterior (NSP) THA using robotic arm-assisted technology compared to two experienced surgeons using traditional methods. Methods Prospectively collected data was reviewed for 120 patients at two institutions. Data were collected on the first 30 anterior approach and the first 30 posterior approach surgeries performed by a newly graduated arthroplasty surgeon (all using robotic arm-assisted technology) and was compared to standard THA by an experienced anterior (SSA) and posterior surgeon (SSP). Acetabular component inclination, version, and leg length were calculated postoperatively and differences calculated based on postoperative film measurement. Results Demographic data were similar between groups with the exception of BMI being lower in the NSA group (27.98 vs 25.2; p = 0.005). Operating time and total time in operating room (TTOR) was lower in the SSA (p < 0.001) and TTOR was higher in the NSP group (p = 0.014). Planned versus postoperative leg length discrepancy were similar among both anterior and posterior surgeries (p > 0.104). Planned versus postoperative abduction and anteversion were similar among the NSA and SSA (p > 0.425), whereas planned versus postoperative abduction and anteversion were lower in the NSP (p < 0.001). Outliers > 10 mm from planned leg length were present in one case of the SSP and NSP, with none in the anterior groups. There were no outliers > 10° in anterior or posterior for abduction in all surgeons. The SSP had six outliers > 10° in anteversion while the NSP had none (p = 0.004); the SSA had no outliers for anteversion while the NSA had one (p = 0.500). Conclusion Robotic arm-assisted technology allowed a newly trained surgeon to produce similarly accurate results and outcomes as experienced surgeons in anterior and posterior hip arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):365–370.

scholarly journals Value of 3D Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Biplanar Weightbearing Radiographs

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Knafo ◽  
F. Houfani ◽  
B. Zaharia ◽  
F. Egrise ◽  
I. Clerc-Urmès ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Preoperative Planning ◽  
Femoral Stem ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Femoral Offset ◽  
Postoperative Result ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Planning Software ◽  
Navigated Surgery

Two-dimensional (2D) planning on standard radiographs for total hip arthroplasty may not be sufficiently accurate to predict implant sizing or restore leg length and femoral offset, whereas 3D planning avoids magnification and projection errors. Furthermore, weightbearing measures are not available with computed tomography (CT) and leg length and offset are rarely checked postoperatively using any imaging modality. Navigation can usually achieve a surgical plan precisely, but the choice of that plan remains key, which is best guided by preoperative planning. The study objectives were therefore to (1) evaluate the accuracy of stem/cup size prediction using dedicated 3D planning software based on biplanar radiographic imaging under weightbearing and (2) compare the preplanned leg length and femoral offset with the postoperative result. This single-centre, single-surgeon prospective study consisted of a cohort of 33 patients operated on over 24 months. The routine clinical workflow consisted of preoperative biplanar weightbearing imaging, 3D surgical planning, navigated surgery to execute the plan, and postoperative biplanar imaging to verify the radiological outcomes in 3D weightbearing. 3D planning was performed with the dedicated hipEOS® planning software to determine stem and cup size and position, plus 3D anatomical and functional parameters, in particular variations in leg length and femoral offset. Component size planning accuracy was 94% (31/33) within one size for the femoral stem and 100% (33/33) within one size for the acetabular cup. There were no significant differences between planned versus implanted femoral stem size or planned versus measured changes in leg length or offset. Cup size did differ significantly, tending towards implanting one size larger when there was a difference. Biplanar radiographs plus hipEOS planning software showed good reliability for predicting implant size, leg length, and femoral offset and postoperatively provided a check on the navigated surgery. Compared to previous studies, the predictive results were better than 2D planning on conventional radiography and equal to 3D planning on CT images, with lower radiation dose, and in the weightbearing position.

scholarly journals Staged reconstruction of unilateral neglected hip dislocation through total hip arthroplasty and subsequent intramedullary femoral lengthening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjoern Vogt ◽  
Christoph Theil ◽  
Georg Gosheger ◽  
Adrien Frommer ◽  
Burkhard Moellenbeck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Femoral Lengthening ◽  
Shortening Osteotomy ◽  
Successful Approach ◽  
Staged Reconstruction

Abstract Background and purpose Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful approach to treat unilateral symptomatic neglected hip dislocation (NHD). However, the extensive leg length discrepancy (LLD) can hereby only be partially corrected. In case of residual LLD of more than 2 cm, subsequent femoral lengthening can be considered. Patients/material/methods Retrospective analysis of clinical data and radiographs of five patients (age 38.1 (28–51) years) with unilateral NHD who underwent THA with (n  = 3) or without (n = 2) subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (SSO) and secondary intramedullary femoral lengthening through a retrograde magnetically-driven lengthening nail (follow-up 18.4 (15–27) months). Results LLD was 51.0 (45–60) mm before and 37.0 (30–45) mm after THA. Delayed bone union at one SSO site healed after revision with autologous bone grafting and plate fixation. Subsequent lengthening led to leg length equalisation in all patients. Complete consolidation was documented in all lengthened segments. Conclusion Staged reconstruction via THA and secondary femoral lengthening can successfully be used to reconstruct the hip joint and equalise LLD. The specific anatomical conditions have to be taken into consideration when planning treatment, and patients ought to be closely monitored.

Changes in patient-perceived leg length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Iwakiri ◽  
Yoichi Ohta ◽  
Takashi Fujii ◽  
Yukihide Minoda ◽  
Akio Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Leg Length Discrepancy ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Length Discrepancy

Measuring leg length and offset with an imageless navigation system during total hip arthroplasty: is it really accurate?

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Renkawitz ◽  
Tibor Schuster ◽  
Thomas Herold ◽  
Holger Goessmann ◽  
Ernst Sendtner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Navigation System ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Imageless Navigation

Biomechanical analysis of transverse acetabular fracture fixation in the elderly via the posterior versus the anterior approach with and without a total hip arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (9) ◽  
pp. 966-974
Author(s):  
Joel Moktar ◽  
Alan Machin ◽  
Habiba Bougherara ◽  
Emil H Schemitsch ◽  
Radovan Zdero
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Total Hip

This study provides the first biomechanical comparison of the fixation constructs that can be created to treat transverse acetabular fractures when using the “gold-standard” posterior versus the anterior approach with and without a total hip arthroplasty in the elderly. Synthetic hemipelvises partially simulating osteoporosis (n = 24) were osteotomized to create a transverse acetabular fracture and then repaired using plates/screws, lag screws, and total hip arthroplasty acetabular components in one of four ways: posterior approach (n = 6), posterior approach plus a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component (n = 6), anterior approach (n = 6), and anterior approach plus a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component (n = 6). All specimens were biomechanically tested. No differences existed between groups for stiffness (range, 324.6–387.3 N/mm, p = 0.629), clinical failure load at 5 mm of femoral head displacement (range, 1630.1–2203.9 N, p = 0.072), or interfragmentary gapping (range, 0.67–1.33 mm, p = 0.359). Adding a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component increased ultimate mechanical failure load for posterior (2904.4 vs. 3652.3 N, p = 0.005) and anterior (3204.9 vs. 4396.0 N, p = 0.000) approaches. Adding a total hip arthroplasty acetabular component also substantially reduced interfragmentary sliding for posterior (3.08 vs. 0.50 mm, p = 0.002) and anterior (2.17 vs. 0.29 mm, p = 0.024) approaches. Consequently, the anterior approach with a total hip arthroplasty may provide the best biomechanical stability for elderly patients, since this fixation group had the highest mechanical failure load and least interfragmentary sliding, while providing equivalent stiffness, clinical failure load, and gapping compared to other surgical options.

Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 108-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J Maloney ◽  
James A Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Leg Length Discrepancy ◽  
Leg Length ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Length Discrepancy

Early Recovery Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Posterior Approach with Modified Postoperative Precautions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick Goeb ◽  
Ethan Krell ◽  
Joseph Nguyen ◽  
Kaitlin M. Carroll ◽  
Seth A. Jerabek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document