Establishment Real- time PCR for Detection Noroviruses in Stool Specimens

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Saged
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 610-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuradha Sinha ◽  
Ayan Dey ◽  
Giulietta Saletti ◽  
Pradip Samanta ◽  
Partha Sarathi Chakraborty ◽  
...  

Developing countries are burdened withShigelladiarrhea. Understanding mucosal immune responses associated with naturalShigellainfection is important to identify potential correlates of protection and, as such, to design effective vaccines. We performed a comparative analysis of circulating mucosal plasmablasts producing specific antibodies against highly conserved invasive plasmid antigens (IpaC, IpaD20, and IpaD120) and two recently identified surface protein antigens,pan-Shigellasurfaceprotein antigen 1 (PSSP1) and PSSP2, common to all virulentShigellastrains. We examined blood and stool specimens from 37 diarrheal patients admitted to the Infectious Diseases & Beliaghata General Hospital, Kolkata, India. The etiological agent of diarrhea was investigated in stool specimens by microbiological methods and real-time PCR. Gut-homing (α4β7+) antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) were isolated from patient blood by means of combined magnetic cell sorting and two-color enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay. Overall, 57% (21 of 37) and 65% (24 of 37) of the patients were positive forShigellainfection by microbiological and real-time PCR assays, respectively. The frequency of α4β7+IgG ASC responders against Ipas was higher than that observed against PSSP1 or PSSP2, regardless of theShigellaserotype isolated from these patients. Thus, α4β7+ASC responses to Ipas may be considered an indirect marker ofShigellainfection. The apparent weakness of ASC responses to PSSP1 is consistent with the lack of cross-protection induced by naturalShigellainfection. The finding that ASC responses to IpaD develop in patients with recent-onset shigellosis indicates that such responses may not be protective or may wane too rapidly and/or be of insufficient magnitude.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Watts ◽  
Rady Kim ◽  
Vishal Ahuja ◽  
Gemma J. Robertson ◽  
Yasmin Sultana ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTStrongyloides stercoraliscan cause disease that ranges from asymptomatic chronic infection to fatal hyperinfection. Diagnosis from stool can be challenging because the most sensitive conventional tests require live larvae to be effective and there can be low larval output in chronic infection. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) have been developed to complement existing diagnostic methods. We compared a recently developed loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay with a real-time PCR that has previously been validated with larval microscopy. The limits of detection—quantified using serial dilutions of DNA extracts from singleStrongyloides rattithird-stage (L3) larvae spiked into approximately 250 µl of 5 differentS. stercoralis-negative stool specimens—were 10−3(1/5 replicates) and 10−2(1/5 replicates) dilutions for PCR and LAMP, respectively. PCR was positive for 4/5 replicates at 10−2. LAMP was compared to PCR using extracts from 396 stool specimens collected in Bangladesh and Australia, of which 53 were positive and 343 were negative by PCR. The positive percentage agreement of LAMP was 77.3% (95% score confidence interval [CI], 64.5 to 86.6). The negative percentage agreement was 100% (95% CI, 98.9 to 100). In a preliminary investigation, PCR and LAMP assays were positive using DNA extracted from serum (PCR, 3/16 extracts; LAMP, 2/16 extracts) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (PCR and LAMP, 2/2 extracts), demonstrating proof of concept. Compared to PCR, the lower number of positive results using the LAMP assay may have been due to reaction inhibitors and DNA degradation, and strategies to improve the LAMP assay are discussed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Jothikumar ◽  
A. J. da Silva ◽  
I. Moura ◽  
Y. Qvarnstrom ◽  
V. R. Hill

Rapid identification of the two major species of Cryptosporidium associated with human infections, Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum, is important for investigating outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis. This study reports the development and validation of a real-time PCR TaqMan procedure for detection of Cryptosporidium species and identification of C. hominis and C. parvum in stool specimens. This procedure comprised a generic TaqMan assay targeting the 18S rRNA for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium species, as well as two other TaqMan assays for identification of C. hominis and C. parvum. The generic Cryptosporidium species assay can be duplexed with the C. parvum-specific assay. The generic Cryptosporidium species assay was able to detect ten Cryptosporidium species and did not cross-react with a panel of ten other protozoan parasites. The generic Cryptosporidium species assay could detect 1–10 oocysts in a 300 μl stool specimen, whilst each of the species-specific TaqMan assays had detection sensitivities that were approximately tenfold higher. The 18S rRNA assay was found to detect Cryptosporidium species in 49/55 DNA extracts from stool specimens containing either C. hominis or C. parvum. The C. hominis TaqMan assay correctly identified C. hominis in 24/31 validation panel specimens containing this species. The C. parvum-specific assay correctly identified C. parvum in 21/24 validation panel specimens containing this species. This real-time PCR procedure was used to detect and identify C. hominis and C. parvum in stool specimens from outbreak investigations in the USA and Botswana, resulting in identification of C. hominis and/or C. parvum in 66/67 stool specimens shown to be positive for these species using other techniques. From the outbreak specimens tested, the TaqMan procedure was found to have a specificity of 94 %. This TaqMan PCR procedure should be a valuable tool for the laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis caused by C. hominis and C. parvum during outbreak investigations.


2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 3922-3928 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Wolk ◽  
S. K. Schneider ◽  
N. L. Wengenack ◽  
L. M. Sloan ◽  
J. E. Rosenblatt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document