Development

Author(s):  
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak

This chapter raises the question of why “development” is a political concept. It asks us to allow the concept of development to overflow the interplay of capital and colony. This makes room for an acknowledgment of complicity—folded-togetherness—rather than see “development” to be conceptualized as good or evil or both after colonialism. It asks us to see that development as sustainable underdevelopment has a longer history and perhaps even that this history is beginning to make itself visible as the pattern of globalization explodes economic growth into developing inequality. It suggests that the conceptualization of development must be unevenly interdisciplinary—statistics and political science folded together, complicit—with the disciplines of subject-formation, the humanities.

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (02) ◽  
pp. 299-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navid Hassanpour

Retroactive digitization of the printed corpus reveals patterns of social evolution and political manipulation. Prior to the introduction of online search, examining the etymology of a political term helped social theorists extrapolate the historical trajectory of a political concept. Now we have tools for quantitative examination of such hypotheses. Using four case studies, I demonstrate the utility of word search dynamics in shedding light on the evolution of long-debated political phenomena. A triad of etymological explorations by Richard Koebner motivates the first three cases.


Author(s):  
Robert Hunter Wade

This chapter examines the globalization argument, which warns that mutual benefits will be at risk if countries start to backslide on market liberalization. It begins with a discussion of trends in globalization over the past century, and the kind of evidence provided by mainstream economists to support the globalization argument. It then considers global-level trends in economic growth, income inequality, and poverty over the past few decades. It also explains why the consensus among economists about the virtues of globalization has been so resilient. It concludes by outlining some challenges for economists, especially in the field of professional ethics. The chapter argues that the evidence for the globalization argument is not as robust as the policy mainstream presumes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Adil Rodionov ◽  
Zhaxylyk Sabitov ◽  
Jason Gainous ◽  
Kevin M. Wagner ◽  
Amanzhol Bekmagambetov ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 99-131
Author(s):  
Ulrich Baer

Why do conservatives and progressives often join forces to defend an absolute notion of free speech, when they fundamentally disagree on many other points? This chapter traces the political concept of free speech back to its origins in philosophy, political science, and commonsensical self-understanding. It shows that conservatives mean something quite different when they talk about free speech from the concept used by progressives, and that the surface agreement can lead to political alliances that do not last. The discussion includes the relativism at the heart of free speech absolutism, the risks of suppressing hate, the concept of self-governance as a limit to bad ideas, and the progressive case for unrestricted speech.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document