scholarly journals Compliance With International Financial Reporting Standards and Value Relevance of Accounting Information in South Africa

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Unity Maqeda Putsai ◽  
Msizi Mkhize
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Significant Positive Association ◽  
Compliance Level

The objective of the study is to investigate the relationship between the International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS 1) and the value relevance (VR) of accounting information. In this study forty-six companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange during the period 1993 to 2017. Panel data is used to compare the period before and after IFRS. The companies in the sample are composed of the following sectors; mining, manufacturing, banks and investment companies, real estate, general industry, retailers, construction and material, chemical and software, and computers. Based on the yearly financial reports published by public companies in South Africa, the study employed the Cookes (1992) Unweighted Disclosure Index to measure the level of compliance in South Africa. Fifty-six disclosure elements from IFRS 1 were utilized to measure the compliance level. Thereafter Ohlson (1995) Model is used with dummy variables to compare the pre-and post-IFRS period. First, the study reflected that most of the South African companies exhibit higher compliance rates ranging from 87 to 93.417 which is impressive. On the other hand, 4 companies recorded Medium level compliance that is between 60% to 79% compliance level. The findings further revealed that there is a significant positive association between compliance with IFRS 1 and the value relevance of accounting information.

International Financial Reporting Standards and Value Relevance of Accounting Information: A Mult-Institutional Perspectives from Nigeria Quoted Firms

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Davies Stanley Diepiriye
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Financial Reporting Standards ◽  
Oil And Gas Firms

This study examined the effect of International Financial Reporting Standards on value relevance of accounting information of quoted firms in Nigeria. The objective is to examine if International Financial Reporting Standards affect value relevance of accounting information. The study focus on the commercial banks, manufacturing firms, insurance, government agencies and the oil and gas firms, questionnaires were structured and administered to accountants and finance managers. The data analyses adopted was the simple percentages and correlation coefficient. The results found a coefficient of 85.1 %, R2   and adjusted R2   of 60.3% and 51.4 %. We conclude that there is significant relationship between International Financial Reporting Standard and value relevance of accounting information   of quoted firms in Nigeria. We therefore recommend full compliance to the International Financial Reporting Standard, audit firms should adopt fully the International Financial Reporting Standard and Nigerian accounting bodies such as Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria and Association of National Accountants of Nigeria should endeavor to encourage the auditing firms on the relevance of adopting International Financial Reporting Standard.

scholarly journals The importance of the IFRS in India

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lious Ntoung Agbor Tabot ◽  
Ben C. Outman ◽  
Eva Masárova
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
Accounting Numbers ◽  
The Impact

In this article the authors study the impact of the mandatory International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) adoption has on the value relevance of accounting numbers based on a sample of 440 listed firms. The aim is to identify the effects of the mandatory IFRS adoption by relying on panel data gathered over the period 2002 to 2012 resulting in more than 4,840 firm-year observations. Two models of Panel regression (stock returns and price models) were employed. The main finding shows that the adoption of IFRS across the studied period results to some improvement in the value relevance of accounting information with the stock return model. With respect to the price models, our result shows that there was slight difference in the value relevance of accounting information after the mandatory IFR adoption across India listed firms.

IFRS Adoption and Value Relevance of Accounting Information: Evidence from a Developing Country

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1416-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habeeb Mohamed Nijam ◽  
Athambawa Jahfer
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Accounting Information ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Ifrs Adoption ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) adoption on value relevance of accounting information in Sri Lanka by comparing value relevance of accounting information in pre- and post-IFRS adoption periods. This study employs Ohlson (1995, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661–687) price regression model to explain value relevance of accounting information. It explains market value per share (MVPS) using earning per share (EPS) and book value of equity per share (BVEPS). The pre-IFRS period is designated as 2010 through to 2011, and the post-IFRS period is designated as 2012 through to 2014. The sample comprises 188 firms and 935 firm-year observations which nearly constitute to all firms listed in Colombo Stock Exchange except those not having at least two annual reports before and after the year 2012 and those having extreme and incomplete data. It is found that both BVEPS and EPS significantly and positively explain MVPS during the periods followed by IFRS adoption although EPS was not a significant predictor of MVPS prior to IFRS adoption. Pooled regression with data of both regimes, however, maintains that BVEPS and EPS significantly and positively explain MVPS. Although the overall predictive power of value relevance model improved in the years that followed IFRS adoption, value relevance of BVEPS has declined in post-IFRS implementation. However, the decline in value relevance of BVEPS perhaps has been compensated by improved quality of earning thereby making EPS as a significant predictor of market value of equity in the post-IFRS periods. These findings were not rebutted or changed even at the exclusion of the transitional year of 2012 from the sample. This study contributes to the extant value relevance literature and IFRS studies by investigating the impact of IFRS adoption in a developing economy and for the first time in Sri Lanka.

scholarly journals Konvergensi IFRS di Indonesia: Apakah Relevansi Nilai Relatif dan Inkremental Informasi Akuntansi Terdampak?

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-234
Author(s):  
Anisah Kusuma Dewi ◽  
Ari Budi Kristanto
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Stock Price ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Earnings Information ◽  
Incremental Value ◽  
Relative Value

This paper investigates whether the value relevance of earnings information and equity information have changed as the IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standard) convergence taken place in Indonesia. The qualitative characteristic is viewed in the perspective of relative value and incremental value relevance. Theoretically, the earning’s value relevance should increase, and equity lost its value relevance pursuant the IFRS convergence. The financial data of manufacturing companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2008-2016 were sorted purposively based on companies with complete financial statement and stock price data during 8 consecutive years. This study uses regression analysis to test the hypotheses. It was found that earning and equity information contain value relevance. Moreover, there is no evidence to support the hypotheses that IFRS convergence decrease earning’s value relevance and decrease equity’s value relevance.

scholarly journals ASIMETRI INFORMASI DAN MANDATORY DISCLOSURE KONVERGENSI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARD: EFEK TERHAADAP RELEVANSI NILAI INFORMASI LABA DAN NILAI BUKU

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dhea Ayu Rosita Putri ◽  
Evi Rahmawati ◽  
Hafiez Sofyani
Keyword(s):  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Information Value ◽  
Mandatory Disclosure ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
The Impact

<p><em>This reasearch aimed to recognize the impact of information asimmetry and mandatory disclosure IFRS convergence toward value relevance of earnings and book value.</em> <em>The population in this study are manufakture companies listed on the  Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) year 2016. Sampling method that use is purposive sampling. The number of samples in this study are 68 samples.</em> <em>Types of data us is secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id.</em> <em>Analysis technique used were Moderated Regression Analysis by SPSS 15.0.</em><em> </em><em>The results showed that the mandatory disclosure level of IFRS convergence increases the relevance of information on the value of earnings, the mandatory disclosure level of IFRS convergence does not increase the relevance of book information value, information asymmetry does not decrease the value relevance of earnings information, and information asymmetry decreases the relevance of book information value.</em></p>

Quality and quantity of FTSE-100 segmental information reporting

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan H. Mardini ◽  
Sameh Ammar
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Information Reporting ◽  
Ifrs 8 ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study aims to explore the impact of international financial reporting standard no. 8 (IFRS 8) on segmental information reporting (SIR) after the post-implementation review (PIR) issued by international accounting standards board (IASB). This impact is examined in relation to quality and quantity as SIR dimensions represent, respectively, the level of reported items and segments. As a complement to this, the chief operating decision maker (CODM) identity is considered to understand the patterns of SIR dimensions. Design/methodology/approach The SIR of the UK financial times stock exchange 100 (FTSE-100) listed companies over the period 2013-2016 is the research’s scope. Several criteria were developed to ensure a representative research sample. A disclosure index approach was used facilitating the use of content analysis for data collection, which pertained to the dimensions of SIR published by the FTSE-100 following IFRS 8 PIR. Findings The IFRS 8 PIR has had several implications shaping the growing trend that is underpinned by the SIR dimensions published by FTSE-100 companies. First, the SIR quantity dimension positively corresponds over 2013-2016, but it still does not meet IASB’s demands. This, secondly, also applies to the quality dimension of SIR to uncover inconsistency with the existing knowledge being held regarding the introduction of IFRS 8. More specifically, the response of the FTSE-100 to mandatory and voluntary items seems to be in transition of substitution. Third, CODM’s identity was an insightful dimension in rationalising the understanding through the aforementioned dimensions. It is undertaken by boards of directors or executive committees and the case of the latter is associated with more disclose in relation to the CODM’s identity. Practical implications These findings reveal implications to: academics undertaking further research about IFRS 8 PIR to challenge or endorse this conclusion, using similar or alternative approaches; the stakeholders’ decision-making process; and policymakers to re-think the structure of mandatory and voluntary items. Originality/value This paper provides empirical evidence on the quality and quantity of SIR published by FTSE-100 companies following IFRS 8 PIR.

scholarly journals The Value of Discretion in Africa: Evidence from Acquired Intangible Assets Under IFRS 3

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050008
Author(s):  
Abongeh A. Tunyi ◽  
Dimu Ehalaiye ◽  
Ernest Gyapong ◽  
Collins G. Ntim
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Value Relevance ◽  
Managerial Discretion ◽  
African Countries ◽  
Target Firm ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
International Financial Reporting Standard ◽  
Main Hypothesis

This paper examines the value of managerial discretion in financial reporting by exploring the value relevance of intangible assets acquired in business combinations (AIA) before and after the 2008 International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 3 amendment. The 2008 IFRS 3 amendment gave managers the discretion to recognize previously unrecognized intangibles in the target firm, hence, we posit that if managerial discretion improves the quality of financial reporting, we should observe an increase in the value relevance of AIA after the amendment. Our empirical analysis is based on a dataset of 603 mergers announced between 2004 and 2016, across seven African countries. Consistent with our main hypothesis, we find that the value relevance of AIA, predominantly acquired goodwill (AGW), increased after the amendment, suggesting that managerial discretion improves the quality of financial information. Our results further show that the value of discretion is moderated by the underlying institutional quality, with the value relevance of AIA being greater in high-quality institutional contexts. Our findings are robust to alternative measures of AIA, alternative models for testing value relevance, and various controls for endogeneity. Overall, our findings have important implications for accounting standard-setters, governments, investors, and practitioners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document