Antecedents and outcomes of Follower Moqi: Leader Humility, Follower Humility, and Knowledge Hiding

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 12971
Author(s):  
Jie Zhong ◽  
Huan Xiao ◽  
Qiuxiang Wen ◽  
Maoyong Bu
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 1019-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Wang ◽  
Bradley P. Owens ◽  
Junchao (Jason) Li ◽  
Lihua Shi

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Offergelt ◽  
Matthias Spörrle ◽  
Klaus Moser ◽  
Jason D. Shaw
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Abraham Cyril Issac ◽  
Thomas Gregor Issac ◽  
Rupashree Baral ◽  
Timothy Colin Bednall ◽  
Tina Susan Thomas
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Roksana Binte Rezwan ◽  
Yoshi Takahashi

This study aimed to understand the psychological process behind employees’ knowledge hiding (KH) behaviors in organizations. KH is an intentional act of concealing knowledge when it is requested by a colleague and can lead to counterproductive consequences for the organization. Therefore, this study synthesized previous studies (n = 88) on KH through a systematic literature review. We used the cognitive–motivational–relational (CMR) theory of emotion to create a framework for the studies’ findings. Based on the framework, the psychological process behind KH has two stages—personal goal generation and the knowledge-request event appraisal process, each of which contains its own CMR process. In the first stage, an individual’s internal and external attributes related to the organization shape their personal goals. In the second stage, an individual appraises the features of a knowledge-request event in terms of both their personal goal and the internal and external attributes that created the goal. If the knowledge request is appraised as harmful for the personal goal, emotion arises and leads to the manifestation of KH. This study contributes to the knowledge management literature as, to our knowledge, it is the first to propose a CMR theory-based framework to understand the overall psychological process behind KH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 303-313
Author(s):  
Sheshadri Chatterjee ◽  
Ranjan Chaudhuri ◽  
Alkis Thrassou ◽  
Demetris Vrontis

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1323-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Andrew Morris ◽  
Céleste M. Brotheridge ◽  
John C. Urbanski

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman Choudhary ◽  
Kirti Mishra

Purpose This paper aims to explore the implications of virtual work arrangements on employee knowledge hiding (KH) behaviour and the different strategies of KH used by employees in these arrangements. Design/methodology/approach Following a grounded theory approach to understanding KH, 21 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with employees engaged in virtual working setups. The data collected from these informants were then analysed using qualitative methods. Findings The study revealed that virtual work arrangements increase employee KH behaviour because of three reasons: ease of hiding, digital burnout and loss of control. Further, the study found that rationalized hiding is the most commonly adopted strategy by employees engaged in virtual work arrangements, while inclinations towards evasive hiding strategy decrease in this arrangement. Originality/value This is the first study in knowledge management literature that seeks to explain KH in the virtual work context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document